Neil Tomson

Prof. Neil Tomson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 February 2015 in Chemical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NTNeil Tomson
Neil Tomson
KWKamille D. Williams
Kamille D. Williams
XDXuliang Dai
Xuliang Dai
SSStephen Sproules
Stephen Sproules
SDSerena DeBeer
Serena DeBeer
KWKarl Wieghardt
Karl Wieghardt
Three [Me2NN]Cu(η2-L2) complexes (Me2NN = HC[C(Me)NAr]2; L2 = PhNO (2), (3), PhCHCH2 (4); Ar = 2,6-Me2-C6H3; ArF = 3,5-(CF3)2-C6H3) have been studied by Cu K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy, as well as single- and multi-reference computational methods (DFT, TD-DFT, CASSCF, MRCI, and OVB). The study was extended to a range of both known and theoretical compounds bearing 2p-element donors as a means of deriving a consistent view of how the pre-edge transition energy responds in systems with significant ground state covalency. The ground state electronic structures of many of the compounds under investigation were found to be strongly influenced by correlation effects, resulting in ground state descriptions with majority contributions from a configuration comprised of a Cu(II) metal center anti-ferromagentically coupled to radical anion O2, PhNO, and ligands. In contrast, the styrene complex 4, which displays a Cu K pre-edge transition despite its formal d10 electron configuration, exhibits what can best be described as a Cu(I):(styrene)0 ground state with strong π-backbonding. The Cu K pre-edge features for these complexes increase in energy from 1 to 4, a trend that was tracked to the percent Cu(II)-character in the ground state. The unexpected shift to higher pre-edge transition energies with decreasing charge on copper (QCu) contributed to an assignment of the pre-edge features for these species as arising from metal-to-ligand charge transfer instead of the traditional Cu1s → Cu3d designation.

19 May 2005 in Chemistry of Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMichelle Regulacio
Michelle Regulacio
NTNeil Tomson
Neil Tomson
SSSarah L. Stoll
Sarah L. Stoll

24 February 2021 in Chemical Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
QWQiuran Wang
Qiuran Wang
SBSam H. Brooks
Sam H. Brooks
TLTianchang Liu
Tianchang Liu
NTNeil Tomson
Neil Tomson
Cluster complexes have attracted interest for decades due to their promise of drawing analogies to metallic surfaces and metalloenzyme active sites, but only recently have chemists started to develop ligand scaffolds that are specifically designed to support multinuclear transition metal cores. Such ligands not only hold multiple metal centers in close proximity but also allow for fine-tuning of their electronic structures and surrounding steric environments. This Feature Article highlights ligand designs that allow for cooperative small molecule activation at cluster complexes, with a particular focus on complexes that contain metal–metal bonds. Two useful ligand-design elements have emerged from this work: a degree of geometric flexibility, which allows for novel small molecule activation modes, and the use of redox-active ligands to provide electronic flexibility to the cluster core. The authors have incorporated these factors into a unique class of dinucleating macrocycles (nPDI2). Redox-active fragments in nPDI2 mimic the weak-overlap covalent bonding that is characteristic of M–M interactions, and aliphatic linkers in the ligand backbone provide geometric flexibility, allowing for interconversion between a range of geometries as the dinuclear core responds to the requirements of various small molecule substrates. The union of these design elements appears to be a powerful combination for analogizing critical aspects of heterogeneous and metalloenzyme catalysts.

11 September 2013 in Advanced Energy Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PCPatrick J. Cappillino
Patrick J. Cappillino
HPHarry D. Pratt
Harry D. Pratt
NHNicholas S. Hudak
Nicholas S. Hudak
NTNeil Tomson
Neil Tomson
TATravis M. Anderson
Travis M. Anderson
MAMitchell R. Anstey
Mitchell R. Anstey

2 November 2011 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NTNeil Tomson
Neil Tomson
MCMark R. Crimmin
Mark R. Crimmin
TPTaras Petrenko
Taras Petrenko
LRLauren E. Rosebrugh
Lauren E. Rosebrugh
SSStephen Sproules
Stephen Sproules
KWKarl Wieghardt
Karl Wieghardt

7 June 2017 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TJTiezheng Jia
Tiezheng Jia
MZMengnan Zhang
Mengnan Zhang
SMSamuel P. McCollom
Samuel P. McCollom
ABAna Bellomo
Ana Bellomo
SMSonia Montel
Sonia Montel
PWPatrick J. Walsh
Patrick J. Walsh