Systemic amyloidosis refers to a group of protein misfolding disorders resulting in organ deposition with amyloid, leading to organ dysfunction, ultimately resulting in organ failure and death if not successfully treated. Treatment is type-specific and aimed at the underlying source of the misfolded protein. In the past decades, treatments have become increasingly available across the various amyloidosis types with improved response rates and longer survival. Supportive care measures are an integral part of care for patients with systemic amyloidosis to improve symptom burden and quality of life, reduce healthcare costs, and potentially prolong survival while type-directed therapy takes effect. In these guidelines, we provide supportive care recommendations across eight areas of interest in systemic amyloidosis: cardiology, nephrology, peripheral neuropathy, central nervous system involvement, autonomic neuropathy, gastroenterology, coagulopathy and bleeding, nutrition and hematology. These guidelines were developed on behalf of the International Society of Amyloidosis (ISA) by experts in the above fields and provide the best available evidence and expertise for supportive care in these rare disorders.

Introduction: The most studied anticancer restrictive diets include fasting, fasting‐mimicking diets (FMDs) and ketogenic diets (KDs). Besides the current lack of established clinical benefit and the significant risk of malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies, dietary restrictions in cancer patients might have relevant psychological effects.Materials and Methods: We reviewed the randomized and non‐randomized controlled clinical trials (CCTs) reporting data on the psychological impact of fasting, FMDs and KDs in cancer patients. We excluded trials on restrictive diets performed for weight reduction in obese or overweight patients, studies on dietary restrictions lasting less than 24 h, and studies on fasting related to cultural or religious beliefs.Results: Three CCTs on fasting or FMDs and eight CCTs on KDs in cancer patients were included. In terms of diet‐related distress, emotional, social, and family well‐being, none of these studies showed a detrimental impact of fasting, FMDs and KDs. However, clinical trials specifically assessing the psychological aspects in the long term are lacking.Conclusions and Perspectives: In the absence of a conclusive evidence on the clinical benefits of restrictive diets, which carry significant risks especially if unsupervised, further studies are needed to clarify their psychological impact in cancer patients. Multidisciplinary approaches including psychological evaluations should be used to ameliorate patient selection for clinical trials, identify early distress symptoms, and increase patient compliance to dietary recommendations.

Preoperative nutritional status is a pivotal aspect to consider in patients with cancer undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), as those at risk of malnutrition or already malnourished are more prone to post-surgical complications. The loss of muscle mass is a major consequence of cancer-related malnutrition. It is associated with increased risk of hospital readmission, longer hospitalization, and higher mortality. Nowadays, the close relationship between nutritional and immunological aspects under stressful conditions, such as surgery, represents an emerging scientific and clinical issue. Indeed, the synergistic action of reduced food intake and systemic inflammation generates metabolic derangements with tissue catabolism, including skeletal muscle breakdown, which is, in turn, associated with immune system dysfunction. In order to offer an additional immune-nutritional boost to the post-surgical phase, particularly in malnourished patients, nutritional support may include oral nutritional supplements and/or enteral formulas enriched with specific nutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids, arginine, glutamine, and nucleotides, with acknowledged immune-modulating effects. In the present narrative review, we addressed the state of the art of the available scientific literature on the benefit of immunonutrition in patients undergoing RC for cancer and suggest possible future perspectives to be explored. Although the role of immunonutrition was found to be little explored in the context of urologic oncology, the preliminary available data on radical cystectomy, summarized in the present paper, are promising and suggest that it may improve postoperative outcomes through immunomodulation, regardless of nutritional status before surgery.

Malnutrition is a common condition in cancer patients