Fraide Agustin Ganotice

Dr. Fraide Agustin Ganotice


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2015 in Learning and Individual Differences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RKRonnel B. King
Ronnel B. King
DMDennis M. McInerney
Dennis M. McInerney
Fraide Agustin GanoticeFraide Agustin Ganotice
Fraide Agustin Ganotice
JVJonalyn B. Villarosa
Jonalyn B. Villarosa

1 November 2015 in Teaching and Teacher Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDennis M. McInerney
Dennis M. McInerney
Fraide Agustin GanoticeFraide Agustin Ganotice
Fraide Agustin Ganotice
RKRonnel B. King
Ronnel B. King
HMHerbert W. Marsh
Herbert W. Marsh
AMAlexandre J.S. Morin
Alexandre J.S. Morin

13 March 2014 in Educational Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDennis M. McInerney
Dennis M. McInerney
Fraide Agustin GanoticeFraide Agustin Ganotice
Fraide Agustin Ganotice
RKRonnel B. King
Ronnel B. King
AMAlexandre J.S. Morin
Alexandre J.S. Morin
HMHerbert W. Marsh
Herbert W. Marsh
Despite ample research on commitment in industrial settings, there has been no systematic attempt to investigate outcomes associated with teacher commitment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the relationship between teacher commitment and psychological well-being in the work place using questionnaires. Hong Kong teachers (N = 857) participated. Hierarchical regression analyses were used to investigate how the three aspects of commitment pertaining to the organisation and occupation predicted relevant outcomes. Results showed that affective and normative commitment positively predicted psychological well-being in the work place: interpersonal fit at work, thriving at work, feeling of competency, perceived recognition at work, desire for involvement at work and job satisfaction. Continuance commitment was a negative predictor of some outcomes. Results of the current study provide support to Meyer’s 3 × 2 factor model of commitment. Findings are discussed in relation to the situation of teachers in the Hong Kong context.

11 March 2015 in Asia Pacific Journal of Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAlexandre J.S. Morin
Alexandre J.S. Morin
JMJohn P. Meyer
John P. Meyer
DMDennis M. McInerney
Dennis M. McInerney
HMHerbert W. Marsh
Herbert W. Marsh
Fraide Agustin GanoticeFraide Agustin Ganotice
Fraide Agustin Ganotice

1 June 2017 in Nurse Education Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Arkers Kwan Ching WongArkers Kwan Ching Wong
Arkers Kwan Ching Wong
FWFrances K.Y. Wong
Frances K.Y. Wong
LCLap Ki Chan
Lap Ki Chan
NCNamkiu Chan
Namkiu Chan
Fraide Agustin GanoticeFraide Agustin Ganotice
Fraide Agustin Ganotice
JHJacqueline Ho
Jacqueline Ho

29 July 2016 in School Psychology International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Fraide Agustin GanoticeFraide Agustin Ganotice
Fraide Agustin Ganotice
JDJesus Alfonso D. Datu
Jesus Alfonso D. Datu
RKRonnel B. King
Ronnel B. King
Previous studies on academic emotions have mostly used variable-centered approaches. Although these studies have elucidated the relationships between academic emotions and key academic outcomes, they cannot identify naturally-occurring groups of students defined by distinct academic emotion profiles. In this study, we adopted a person-centered approach to explore whether students can be grouped in terms of distinct academic emotion profiles and whether these groups differed in terms of key academic outcomes. Cluster analyses showed four distinct profiles across both domain-general (Study 1) and domain-specific (Study 2) academic emotions. Students with high levels of positive academic emotions and low levels of negative academic emotions exhibited the most adaptive educational outcomes followed by students characterized by high levels of positive emotions and moderately high levels of shame. The most maladaptive profile was exhibited by students who are low in positive academic emotions and high in negative academic emotions. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.