Hin-Seng Wong

Dr. Hin-Seng Wong

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 October 2005 in Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LOLoke Meng Ong
Loke Meng Ong
LHLai Seong Hooi
Lai Seong Hooi
TLTeck Onn Lim
Teck Onn Lim
BGBak-Leong Goh
Bak-Leong Goh
GAGhazali Ahmad
Ghazali Ahmad
ZMZaki Morad
Zaki Morad

10 February 2005 in Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LHLai Seong Hooi
Lai Seong Hooi
TLTeck Onn Lim
Teck Onn Lim
AGAdrian Goh
Adrian Goh
HWHin-Seng Wong
Hin-Seng Wong
CTChwee Choon Tan
Chwee Choon Tan
ZMZaki Morad
Zaki Morad

1 September 2011 in Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KKKeng-Hee Koh
Keng-Hee Koh
HWHin-Seng Wong
Hin-Seng Wong
KGKuan-Weng Go
Kuan-Weng Go
ZMZaki Morad
Zaki Morad
Background: While phase angle of bioimpedance analysis (BIA) has great survival-predicting value in dialysis populations, it is known to be higher in male than in female subjects. In this study, we aimed to explore the factors influencing the predictive value of phase angle and to identify the appropriate physics terms for normalizing capacitance (C) and resistance (R). Methods: We formulated body capacitive index (BCI), CBMI (capacitance x height2/weight), body resistive index (BRI), RBMI (resistance x weight/height2), and CH2 (capacitance x height2). We also studied H2/R, R/H, and reactance of a capacitor/height (XC/H). There are 3 components in this study design: ( 1 ) establishment of normal values in a control Malaysian population, ( 2 ) comparison of these with a CAPD population, and ( 3 ) prediction of survival within a CAPD population. We initially performed a BIA study in 206 female and 116 male healthy volunteers, followed by a prospective study in a cohort of 128 CAPD patients [47 with diabetes mellitus (DM), 81 non-DM; 59 males, 69 females] for at least 2 years. All the parameters during enrolment, including BIA, serum albumin, peritoneal equilibrium test, age, and DM status, were analyzed. Outcome measurement was survival. Results: In healthy volunteers, both genders had the same BCI (2.0 nF kg/m2). On the contrary, female normal subjects had higher BRI than male normal subjects (median 15 642 vs 13242 Ω kg/m2, p < 0.001) due to higher fat percentage (35.4% ± 0.4% vs 28.0% ± 0.6%, p < 0.001), resulting in a lower phase angle (mean 5.82 ± 0.04 vs 6.86 ± 0.07 degrees, p < 0.001). Logistic regression showed that BCI was the best risk indicator in 128 CAPD patients versus 322 normal subjects. In age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched head-to-head comparison, BCI had the highest χ2 value (χ2 = 102.63), followed by CH2 (or H2/XC; χ2 = 81.00), BRI (χ2 = 20.54), and XC/H (x2 = 20.48), with p value < 0.001 for these parameters. In comparison, phase angle (χ2 = 11.42), R/H (χ2 = 7.19), and H2/R (χ2 = 5.69) had lower χ2 values. 35 (27.3%) patients died during the study period. Univariate analysis adjusted for DM status and serum albumin level demonstrated that non-surviving patients had significantly higher CH2 (245 vs 169 nF m2, p < 0.001) and BCI (4.0 vs 2.9 nF m2/kg, p = 0.005) than patients that survived. CH2 was the best predictor for all-cause mortality in Cox regression analysis, followed by BCI, phase angle, and XC/H. Conclusion: Measures that normalize, such as BCI and CH2, have higher risk discrimination and survival prediction ability than measures that do not normalize, such as phase angle. Unlike phase angle, measurement of BCI overcomes the gender effect. In this study, the best risk indicator for CAPD patients versus the general population is BCI, reflecting deficit in nutritional concentration, while CH2 reflects total nutritional deficit and thus is the major risk indicator for survival of CAPD patients.

1 November 2015 in Transplantation Direct
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSunita Bavanandan
Sunita Bavanandan
YYYok-Chin Yap
Yok-Chin Yap
GAGhazali Ahmad
Ghazali Ahmad
HWHin-Seng Wong
Hin-Seng Wong
SASoraya Azmi
Soraya Azmi
AGAdrian Goh
Adrian Goh
Kidney transplantation is the optimal therapy for the majority of patients with end-stage renal disease. However, the cost and health outcomes of transplantation have not been assessed in a middle-income nation with a low volume of transplantation, such as Malaysia. This study used microcosting methods to determine the cost and health outcomes of living and deceased donor kidney transplantation in adult and pediatric recipients. The perspective used was from the Ministry of Health Malaysia. Cost-effectiveness measures were cost per life year (LY) and cost per quality-adjusted LYs. The time horizon was the lifetime of the transplant recipient from transplant to death. Records of 206 KT recipients (118 adults and 88 children) were obtained for microcosting. In adults, discounted cost per LY was US $8609(Malaysian Ringgit [RM]29 482) and US $13 209(RM45 234) for living-donor kidney transplant (LKT) and deceased donor kidney transplant (DKT), respectively, whereas in children, it was US $10 485(RM35 905) and US $14 985(RM51 317), respectively. Cost per quality-adjusted LY in adults was US $8826 (RM30 224) for LKT and US $13 592(RM46 546) for DKT. Total lifetime discounted costs of adult transplants were US $119 702 (RM409 921) for LKT, US $147 152 (RM503 922) for DKT. Total costs for pediatric transplants were US $154 841(RM530 252) and US $159 313(RM545 566) for the 2 categories respectively. Both LKT and DKT are economically favorable for Malaysian adult and pediatric patients with ESRD and result in improvement in quality of life.

1 April 2005 in Kidney International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLai Seong Hooi
Lai Seong Hooi
HWHin-Seng Wong
Hin-Seng Wong
ZMZaki Morad
Zaki Morad
Prevention of renal failure: The Malaysian experience. Renal replacement therapy in Malaysia has shown exponential growth since 1990. The dialysis acceptance rate for 2003 was 80 per million population, prevalence 391 per million population. There are now more than 10,000 patients on dialysis. This growth is proportional to the growth in gross domestic product (GDP). Improvement in nephrology and urology services with widespread availability of ultrasonography and renal pathology has improved care of renal patients. Proper management of renal stone disease, lupus nephritis, and acute renal failure has decreased these as causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in younger age groups. Older patients are being accepted for dialysis, and 51% of new patients on dialysis were diabetic in 2003. The prevalence of diabetes is rising in the country (presently 7%); glycemic control of such patients is suboptimal. Thirty-three percent of adult Malaysians are hypertensive and blood pressure control is poor (6%). There is a national coordinating committee to oversee the control of diabetes and hypertension in the country. Primary care clinics have been provided with kits to detect microalbuminuria, and ACE inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension and diabetic nephropathy. Prevention of renal failure workshops targeted at primary care doctors have been launched, opportunistic screening at health clinics is being carried out, and public education targeting high-risk groups is ongoing. The challenge in Malaysia is to stem the rising tide of diabetic ESRD.

1 September 2006 in American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HWHin-Seng Wong
Hin-Seng Wong
LOLoke-Meng Ong
Loke-Meng Ong
TLTeck-Onn Lim
Teck-Onn Lim
LHLai-Seong Hooi
Lai-Seong Hooi
ZMZaki Morad
Zaki Morad
MLMing-Lee Lee
Ming-Lee Lee