Over 5 million stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur annually. Limited and imprecise information on the cause of these deaths hampers progress in achieving global health targets. Complete diagnostic autopsies (CDAs)—the gold standard for cause of death determination—are difficult to perform in most high-burden settings. Therefore, validation of simpler and more feasible methods is needed. In this observational study, the validity of a minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) method in determining the cause of death was assessed in 18 stillbirths and 41 neonatal deaths by comparing the results of the MIA with those of the CDA. Concordance between the categories of diseases obtained by the 2 methods was assessed by the Kappa statistic, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of the MIA diagnoses were calculated. A cause of death was identified in 16/18 (89%) and 15/18 (83%) stillborn babies in the CDA and the MIA, respectively. Fetal growth restriction accounted for 39%, infectious diseases for 22%, intrapartum hypoxia for 17%, and intrauterine hypoxia for 11% of stillborn babies. Overall, the MIA showed in this group a substantial concordance with the CDA (Kappa = 0.78, 95% CI [0.56–0.99]). A cause of death was identified in all (100%) and 35/41 (85%) neonatal deaths in the CDA and the MIA, respectively. In this group, the majority of deaths were due to infectious diseases (66%). The overall concordance of the MIA with the CDA in neonates was moderate (Kappa = 0.40, 95% CI [0.18–0.63]). A high percentage of accuracy was observed for the MIA in all the diagnostic categories in both stillbirths and neonates (>75%). The main limitation of this study is that some degree of subjective interpretation is inherent to cause-of-death attribution in both the MIA and the CDA; this is especially so in stillbirths and in relation to fetal growth restriction. The MIA could be a useful tool for cause-of-death determination in stillbirths and neonatal deaths. These findings may help to accelerate progress towards meeting global health targets by obtaining more accurate information on the causes of death in these age groups, which is essential in guiding the design of new interventions and increasing the effectiveness of those already implemented.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on oncological outcomes in node-negative early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with perineural invasion (PNI). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases for the period from 2000 to 2024. Studies comparing PORT versus observation in pN0 early-stage OSCC with PNI were included. Oncological outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local control (LC). A random-effects model was used to calculate log odds ratios, and heterogeneity was assessed using tau², chi², and I² statistics. Results: Seven retrospective studies comprising 522 patients (281 PORT, 241 no-PORT) were included. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 86.3% in the PORT group compared to 71.1% in the no-PORT group (logOR = −1.03, p = 0.0012), while the 5-year OS was 88.1% versus 77.3% (logOR = −0.97, p = 0.0061). Disease-free survival (DFS) also favored PORT, with 3-year DFS at 86.3% versus 58.1% (logOR = −1.19, p < 0.001) and 5-year DFS at 86.3% versus 55% (logOR = −0.78, p = 0.003). Local control (LC) was higher in the PORT group, with 3-year LC rates of 89% compared to 72.2% in the no-PORT group (logOR = −1.13, p = 0.025). Conclusions: PORT significantly improves OS, DFS, and LC in node-negative early-stage OSCC with PNI as the sole adverse feature.