Developing rubber agroforestry systems is crucial to ensure the sustainable development of natural rubber cultivation. This study focuses on the starch crop Maranta arundinacea (arrowroot) and assesses its productivity and influencing factors when intercropped in 6–7-year-old conventional single-row and double-row rubber plantations. We analyze various aspects, including light resources, root distribution, soil nutrients, arrowroot growth characteristics, and product quality. The results indicate that the daily average photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in the double-row rubber agroforestry system intercropping area ranges from 896.4 to 940.2 μmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹. Additionally, the rubber tree roots near the intercropping area are less dense (107.0 g cm⁻³). In contrast, the conventional single-row rubber agroforestry system has a significantly lower daily average PAR of only 145.7 μmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹, and the nearby rubber tree roots are more abundant (616.2 g cm⁻³). Although soil nutrient levels were slightly lower in the intercropping area on the double-row treatment compared to the single-row treatment, there was no statistical difference (p < 0.05). Arrowroot’s photosynthetic capacity in the double-row rubber agroforestry system intercropping area is significantly greater than in the single-row rubber agroforestry system intercropping area. The yield per unit area in the former (23.46–27.47 t·ha⁻¹) is also significantly higher than in the latter (2.87–4.75 t·ha⁻¹, p < 0.05), with higher starch content. Therefore, arrowroot exhibits higher productivity when intercropped in double-row rubber agroforestry systems, making it suitable for establishing a “rubber–arrowroot” agroforestry model to enhance the yield per unit area of rubber plantations.

Agroforestry is known to significantly improve long-term land productivity, potentially enhancing the ability to cope with climate stress. However, there is limited information regarding the accurate monitoring of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in rubber-based agroforestry systems. Before GHGs can be accurately estimated, the diurnal variations and suitable sampling times must be studied to reduce the uncertainty of the manual static chamber method. In this study, the soil GHGs emitted from conventional single-row (SR) and improved double-row (DR) rubber plantations were compared across the dry and wet seasons in Hainan, China. A total of 1728 GHG samples from a field trial were collected, analyzed, and related to environmental factors. The results demonstrated that the diurnal fluxes of CO₂ in rubber plantations were likely to remain fluctuating, with the maximum typically occurring during the night-time and daytime hours of the dry and wet seasons, respectively. A clearer double-peak (around 2:00 and 14:00) during the dry season and a daytime peak (14:00) during the wet season of the N₂O were recorded. In addition to the commonalities, different seasons and different types of GHGs and rubber plantations also differed in their detailed fluctuation times and ranges; therefore, the determination of suitable sampling times should not ignore these factors in certain cases. Based on this study, it was determined that the late afternoon (16:00–18:00) was the suitable sampling time of soil GHGs in rubber plantations, instead of the most common morning times (with an underestimation of 25% on average). In addition, the air humidity during the dry season and the soil temperature during the wet season were both positively correlated with GHGs (p < 0.05). This study highlights the significance of accurately monitoring soil GHGs in rubber-based agroforestry systems, providing a basic reference for the development and management of climate-smart land use practices in rubber plantations.

Developing a more productive, resource-efficient, and climate-smart rubber agroforestry model is essential for the sustainable growth of natural rubber cultivation. In this study, we evaluated whether a double-row rubber plantation intercropped with the medicinal crop Ficus hirta Vahl. (DR-F) could achieve this goal, using a single-row rubber plantation (SR) as the control. We assessed the feasibility of the DR-F system based on productivity, solar utilization efficiency (SUE), partial factor productivity of applied nitrogen (PFPN), carbon efficiency (CE), net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB), and carbon footprint (CF). No significant difference was observed in rubber tree biomass between the DR-F (10.49 t·ha⁻¹) and SR (8.49 t·ha⁻¹) systems. However, the DR-F system exhibited significantly higher total biomass productivity (23.34 t·ha⁻¹) than the SR systems due to the substantial contribution from intercropped Ficus hirta Vahl., which yielded 12.84 t·ha⁻¹(p < 0.05). The root fresh weight yield of Ficus hirta Vahl. reached 17.55 t·ha⁻¹, generating an additional profit of 20,417 CNY ha⁻¹. The DR-F system also exhibited higher solar radiation interception and greater availability of soil nutrients. Notably, the roots of rubber trees and Ficus hirta Vahl. did not overlap at a 4 m distance from the rubber trees. The DR-F system achieved higher SUE (0.64%), PFPN (51.40 kg·kg⁻¹ N), and CE (6.93 kg·kg⁻¹ C) than the SR system, with the SUE and PFPN differences being statistically significant (p < 0.05). Although the NECB remained unaffected, the DR-F system demonstrated significantly higher productivity and a substantially lower CF (0.33 kg CO₂·kg⁻¹, a 56% reduction; p < 0.05). In conclusion, the DR-F system represents a more sustainable and beneficial agroforestry approach, offering improved productivity, greater resource use efficiency, and reduced environmental impact.