The Health Literacy for School-Aged Children (HLSAC) is a brief, generic instrument measuring health literacy among school-aged children. Given its brevity and broad conceptualization of health literacy, the HLSAC is a potentially valuable measuring instrument among adults as well. This validation study aimed to adapt the HLSAC questionnaire to an adult population through assessment of content validity and subsequently determine the structural validity of the adapted instrument, the Brief Health Literacy scale for Adults (B-HLA). The content validity of the HLSAC was assessed through interviews with respondents and experts, and the structural validity of the adapted instrument (B-HLA) was evaluated using Rasch analysis. The content validity assessment (n = 25) gave rise to adjustments in the wording of five items. The B-HLA demonstrated an overall misfit to the Rasch model (n = 290). Items 6 and 8 had the poorest individual fits. We found no signs of local dependency or differential item functioning concerning sex, age, education, and native language. The B-HLA demonstrated unidimensionality and ability to discriminate across health literacy levels (PSI = 0.80). Discarding items 6 or 8 resulted in an overall model fit and individual fit of all items. In conclusion, the B-HLA appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing health literacy among adults.

Mental health issues are common among patients with chronic physical conditions. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the Healthy Mind intervention, a general practice-based programme that provides problem-solving therapy (PST) to patients with poor mental well-being and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and/or ischaemic heart disease (IHD). A one-arm feasibility study was conducted in three general practices in the Central Denmark Region. Eight healthcare providers from the included general practices underwent a two-day course to acquire PST skills. Screening for poor mental health was carried out at the annual chronic care consultation for T2D or IHD, and PST sessions were offered to patients on indication of poor mental health. Nine patients received PST. Semi-structured interviews with eight healthcare providers and six patients were conducted. Data were analysed deductively focusing on appropriateness, acceptability and fidelity of the intervention. The intervention was considered appropriate for the patient group and the general practice setting. The providers acknowledged PST as a valuable tool for managing psychological issues in general practice, and the patients perceived PST as an effective and tangible treatment. Since practice nurses' schedules were generally better suited for longer consultations, they were often the preferred intervention providers. The intervention was largely delivered as intended. However, the GPs generally expected patients to prefer a more directive approach, which sometimes challenged their role as facilitator and guide. The Healthy Mind intervention was found to be feasible, and the results support proceeding to a full-scale evaluation trial.

Background: Type two diabetes (T2D) is linked to impaired mental health. International guidelines emphasise the importance of including psychological aspects in diabetes care. Yet, no systematic approach has been implemented to assess mental health in patients with T2D in general practice.Aim: To evaluate the mental health of patients with T2D in general practice, and to investigate the effectiveness of asking patients about their wellbeing by using a single-item question compared with the five-item World Health Organization-Five Wellbeing Index (WHO-5).Design & setting: A cross-sectional study was undertaken, which included 230 patients with T2D in Danish general practice, from 1 May 2023–31 January 2024.Method: Eligible patients were recruited at the annual chronic care consultation. They answered a single-item question on wellbeing and four validated measures of general wellbeing (WHO-5), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PHQ-9), anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7; GAD-7), and diabetes distress (Problem Areas in Diabetes-5; PAID-5).Results: Overall, 32% of patients expressed symptoms of impaired mental health. Notably, the WHO-5 identified 53% of these patients, whereas only 12% of patients were identified through the single-item question. Importantly, among the patients exhibiting symptoms of impaired mental health, those identified by the WHO-5 displayed statistically significantly lower mental health scores across all measures (except PAID-5) compared with those not identified by the WHO-5.Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients with T2D in general practice are affected by mental health issues. Our findings indicate that a single-item question may not sufficiently detect these issues, highlighting the importance of incorporating tools, such as the WHO-5, to offer a more comprehensive approach in diabetes care.

Individuals with chronic diseases, such as ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), are at increased risk of poor mental well-being, which