Modern studies focus on the discovery of innovative methods to improve the value of post-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the prediction of pathological responses to preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The aim of this study was to assess the potential benefits of combining magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (mrTRG) with T2-weighted volumetry in the prediction of pathological responses to nCRT in LARC. This was a cohort study conducted on patients with histopathologically confirmed LARC in a period from 2020 to 2022. After histopathological verification, all patients underwent initial MRI studies, while the follow-up MRI was performed after nCRT. Tumor characteristics, MRI estimated tumor regression grade (mrTRG) and tumor volumetry were evaluated both initially and at follow-up. All patients were classified into responders and non-responders according to pathological tumor regression grade (pTRG) and mrTRG. A total of 71 patients, mostly male (66.2%) were included in the study. The median tumor volume reduction rate was significantly higher in nCRT-responders compared to non-responders (79.9% vs. 63.3%) (p = 0.003). Based on ROC analysis, optimal cut-off value for tumor volume reduction rate was determined with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.724 (p = 0.003). Using the tumor volume reduction rate ≥75% with the addition of response to nCRT according to mrTRG, a new scoring system for prediction of pTRG to preoperative nCRT in LARC was developed. Diagnostic performance of prediction score was tested and the sensitivity, PPV, specificity, and NPV were 81.8%, 56.3%, 71.4%, and 89.7%, respectively. The combination of mrTRG and T2-weighted volumetry increases the MRI-based prediction of pTRG to preoperative nCRT in LARC. The proposed scoring system could aid in distinguishing responders to nCRT, as these patients could benefit from organ-preserving treatment and a “watch and wait” strategy.

Background: This study was designed to determine the role of primary repair and to investigate the possibility of expanding indications for primary repair of colon injuries using nonselective approach.Methods: Two groups of patients were analyzed. Retrospective (RS) group included 30 patients managed by primary repair or two stage surgical procedure according to criteria published by Stone (S/F) and Flint (Fl). In this group 18 patients were managed by primary repair. Prospective (PR) group included 33 patients with primary repair as a first choice procedure. In this group, primary repair was performed in 30 cases.Results: Groups were comparable regarding age, sex, and indexes of trauma severity. Time between injury and surgery was shorter in PR group, (1.3 vs. 3.1 hours). Stab wounds were more frequent in PR group (9:2), and iatrogenic lesions in RS group (6:2). Associated injuries were similar, as well as segmental distribution of colon injuries. S/F criteria and Flint grading were similar.In RS group 15 primary repairs were successful, while in two cases relaparotomy and colostomy was performed due to anastomotic leakage. One patient died. In PR group, 25 primary repairs were successful, with 2 immediate and 3 postoperative (7-10 days) deaths, with no evidence of anastomotic leakage.Conclusions: Results of this study justify more liberal use of primary repair in early management of colon injuries.Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN94682396

Background/Objectives: With advances in surgical techniques for rectal cancer—particularly laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches—the choice of operative method may influence not only oncological but also functional outcomes. This study aimed to compare open and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery regarding pelvic autonomic nerve identification, preservation and its impact on postoperative urinary, sexual, and quality-of-life outcomes. Methods: A total of 181 patients who underwent curative rectal cancer surgery at the Clinic for Digestive Surgery, University Clinical Center of Serbia, were included. Six types of procedures were performed using both open and laparoscopic approaches. Intraoperative identification and preservation of pelvic autonomic nerves were assessed and verified postoperatively through evaluation of urinary, sexual, and quality-of-life parameters. Urinary function and related life quality were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS and IPSS-QoL), while sexual function was evaluated using gender-specific validated questionnaires (IIEF-15 and FSFI) preoperatively and at 2, 4, and 6 months postoperatively. Results: Nerve non-visualization and/or injuries were significantly more frequent in the open surgery group. The laparoscopic approach was associated with better preservation of urinary function, particularly among male patients, better sexual function in both sexes, and a transient advantage in quality of life. Conclusions: Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery demonstrated superior pelvic autonomic nerve visualization and preservation and better short-term urinary and sexual function. Nonetheless, quality-of-life outcomes were comparable by 6 months of follow-up, underscoring the importance of meticulous nerve-preserving technique regardless of surgical approach.

Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) presents a clinical challenge due to lack of reliable molecular biomarkers for early diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged as promising candidates due to their characteristics and regulatory roles. H19, NEAT1, MALAT1 and HOTAIR are lncRNAs deregulated in gastrointestinal cancers, with insufficient data on their biomarker potential in LARC. The study aimed to analyze the diagnostic, prognostic and predictive utility of H19, NEAT1, MALAT1 and HOTAIR in LARC. Relative expression was evaluated by RT-qPCR in tumor and non-tumor tissues from 25 LARC patients before and after nCRT. H19, NEAT1, and MALAT1 showed significantly altered expression in tumor tissue, as well as non-tumor tissue before and after nCRT. H19 expression was significantly higher in tumor vs. non-tumor tissue before treatment and demonstrated moderate potential to discriminate between tumor and non-tumor. None of the lncRNAs showed statistically significant predictive values for nCRT response or association with treatment outcomes in our study, which was limited by the small number of responders. Our results suggest that H19 might be considered as a potential therapeutic target in LARC. Further studies with larger patient groups are required to confirm its diagnostic and prognostic utility.