LUO FANG

Ms. LUO FANG


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 October 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HLHe Li
He Li
XWXiantan Wu
Xiantan Wu
ZHZhengwei He
Zhengwei He
DXDongjian Xue
Dongjian Xue
LFLUO FANG
LUO FANG
YZYuxiang Zhang
Yuxiang Zhang
Landslide susceptibility assessment can effectively predict the spatial distribution of potential landslides, which is of great significance in fields such as geological disaster prevention, urban planning, etc. Taking Xining City as an example, based on GF-2 remote sensing image data and combined with field survey data, this study delineated the spatial distribution range of developed landslides. Key factors controlling landslides were then extracted to establish a landslide susceptibility assessment index system. Based on this, the frequency ratio (FR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN) models were applied to spatially predict landslide susceptibility with slope units as the basis. The main results are as follows: (1) The overall spatial distribution of landslide susceptibility classes in Xining City is consistent, but the differences between different landslide susceptibility classes are significant. (2) The high-susceptibility area predicted by the FR-RF model is the largest, accounting for 15.48% of the total study area. The prediction results of the FR-ANN and FR-SVM models are more similar, with high-susceptibility areas accounting for 13.96% and 12.97%, respectively. (3) The accuracy verification results show that all three coupled models have good spatial prediction capabilities in the study area. The order of landslide susceptibility prediction capabilities from high to low is FR-RF model > FR-ANN model > FR-SVM model. This indicates that in the study area, the FR-RF model is more suitable for carrying out landslide susceptibility assessment.

22 October 2025 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YCYuxin Cen
Yuxin Cen
HLHe Li
He Li
ZHZhengwei He
Zhengwei He
LFLUO FANG
LUO FANG
YZYang Zhao
Yang Zhao
XCXin Chen
Xin Chen
Monitoring ecosystem dynamics in arid regions requires robust indicators that can capture spatial heterogeneity and diverse ecological drivers. In this study, we introduce and evaluate two novel ecological indices: the Arid-region Remote Sensing Ecological Index (ARSEI), specifically designed for desert environments, and the Composite Remote Sensing Ecological Index (CoRSEI), which integrates both desert and non-desert systems. These indices are compared with the traditional Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI) in the Tarim River Basin from 2000 to 2023. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that RSEI maintained the highest structural compactness (average PCA1 = 87.49%). In contrast, ARSEI (average PCA1 = 78.62%) enhanced sensitivity to albedo and vegetation (NDVI) in arid environments. Spearman correlation analysis further demonstrated that ARSEI was more strongly correlated with NDVI (ρ = 0.49) and precipitation (ρ = 0.62) than RSEI, confirming its improved responsiveness under water-limited conditions. CoRSEI exhibited higher internal consistency and spatial adaptability (mean values ranging from 0.45 to 0.56), with slight ecological improvements observed between 2000 and 2023. Ecological drivers varied across habitat types. In desert areas, evapotranspiration, precipitation, and soil moisture were the main determinants of ecological status, showing high coupling and synchrony. In non-desert regions, soil moisture and precipitation remained dominant, but vegetation indices and disturbance factors (e.g., fire density) exerted stronger long-term influences. Partial dependence analyses further confirmed nonlinear, region-specific responses, such as the threshold effects of precipitation on vegetation growth. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of differentiated ecological modeling. ARSEI enhances sensitivity in desert ecosystems, whereas CoRSEI captures landscape-scale variability across desert and non-desert regions. Both indices contribute to more accurate long-term ecological assessments in hyper-arid environments.

21 October 2024 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YXYixian Xiao
Yixian Xiao
HLHe Li
He Li
XCXin Chen
Xin Chen
ZHZhengwei He
Zhengwei He
YLYangqi Lai
Yangqi Lai
JRJin Run
Jin Run
Ertan Hydroelectric Power Station was the first large-scale water conservancy facility in western China, and with its completion, the ecological pattern of the reservoir area has changed dramatically; however, the changes in habitat quality before and after the completion of the reservoir have not yet been systematically monitored and evaluated. In this study, we analyzed the spatial and temporal characteristics of the remote sensing ecological index (RSEI), used CA-Markov model and GeoDetector, evaluated the ecological environment of the Ertan Reservoir area in each five-year period from 1995 to 2020, simulated the ecological quality of the Ertan Reservoir area in 2025, and revealed the nine drivers and their interactions affecting ecological quality of the watershed from a geologic point of view, and finally put forward reasonable planning and targeted protection suggestions. Finally, rational planning and targeted protection recommendations were proposed. The main results were as follows: (1) After the completion of the Ertan Hydropower Station, the spatial distribution of the RSEI in the reservoir area varied significantly, with a trend of “rising-declining-rising” in time, and the area share of “good” area increased the most, by 19.83%. (2) The degree of grading of each driving factor had different degrees of influence on the size of the RSEI value, and its interaction enhanced the spatial differentiation of the RSEI. (3) The average value of the RSEI is 0.66 in 2025, and the ecological environment quality will show a steady improvement in five years. The results of the study can provide a reference for constructing RSEI indicators for large hydropower facilities.

8 August 2024 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LFLUO FANG
LUO FANG
HLHe Li
He Li
ZHZhengwei He
Zhengwei He
WZWanting Zeng
Wanting Zeng
YWYuanchao Wang
Yuanchao Wang
Constructing coastal ecological security barriers is beneficial for preventing environmental degradation and enhancing resilience to natural disasters. This study examines the functionality of these barriers from an ecosystem service perspective, developing an Ecosystem Security Barrier Function (ESBF) index to analyze its spatiotemporal variations. From 2000 to 2020, habitat quality in the study area experienced a slight decline, while water supply capacity initially increased and then decreased. Water purification capacity hit its lowest point in 2015 before improving. The ESBF generally ranged from moderate to high levels, with higher values in the northwest and lower values in the southeast, showing strong spatial autocorrelations. Despite mild degradation in some areas, overall stability was maintained with frequent transitions between ESBF levels. Utilizing the Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) model, we conducted a grid-scale analysis of the driving mechanisms behind ESBF. We found that precipitation, elevation, and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) positively correlated with ESBF, whereas population density, land use, and nighttime lights negatively correlated. The relationship between temperature and ESBF showed a “north-positive, south-negative” pattern. The study recommends enhancing coastal wetland restoration, strengthening protective forest construction, and effectively controlling pollutant sources entering the sea to safeguard and improve the ecological security barrier function.