AMR is a major public health concern that calls for extensive work and a multidisciplinary team approach. The high prevalence of infectious diseases in African nations leads to widespread antibiotic usage and eventual antimicrobial resistance, which has significant negative effects on people’s health, the economy, and society. Additionally, inadequate or nonexistent antimicrobial drug regulations, inappropriate prescription practices, and restrictions on public health prevention initiatives such as immunization, water and sanitation, and sexual health may all contribute to the emergence of AMR. Despite the need for laboratory quality assurance, many African laboratories confront substantial difficulties in implementing efficient quality assurance programs. AMR surveillance in Africa is hampered by a lack of laboratory capacity, insufficient data collection and analysis, and poor stakeholder collaboration. Several initiatives and programs, including the World Health Organization’s Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS), the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (AMRSNET), and the Fleming Fund, a UK government initiative aimed at tackling AMR in low- and middle-income countries, have been established to strengthen AMR surveillance in Africa and globally.

Background: Antimicrobial combination therapy is a time/resource- intensive procedure commonly employed in the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations caused by P. aeruginosa. Ten years ago the most promising antimicrobial combinations were proposed, but there has since been the introduction of new β-lactam+β-lactamase inhibitor antimicrobial combinations. The aims of this study were i) to compare in vitro activity of these new antimicrobials with other anti-pseudomonals agents and suggest their most synergistic antimicrobial combinations. ii) to determine antimicrobial resistance rates and study inherent trends of antimicrobials over ten years. Methods: A total of 721 multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from 183 patients were collated over the study period. Antimicrobial susceptibility and combination testing were carried out using the Etest method. The results were further assessed using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and the susceptible breakpoint index (SBPI). Results: Resistance to almost all antimicrobial agents maintained a similar level during the studied period. Colistin (p<0.001) and tobramycin (p=0.001) were the only antimicrobials with significant increasing isolate susceptibility while an increasing resistance trend was observed for levofloxacin. The most active antimicrobials were colistin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and gentamicin. All combinations with β-lactam+β-lactamase inhibitors produced some synergistic results. Ciprofloxacin+ceftolozane/tazobactam (40%) and amikacin+ceftazidime (36.7%) were the most synergistic combinations while colistin combinations gave the best median SPBI (50.11). Conclusions: This study suggests that effective fluoroquinolone stewardship should be employed for CF patients. It also presents in vitro data to support the efficacy of novel combinations for use in the treatment of chronic P. aeruginosa infections.

Achromobacter spp. are recognized as emerging pathogens in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Though recent works have established species-level identification using nrdA sequencing, there is a dearth in knowledge relating to species-level antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and antimicrobial combinations, which hampers the use of optimal antimicrobial combinations for the treatment of chronic infections. The aims of this study were to (i) identify at species-level referred Achromobacter isolates, (ii) describe species-level antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, and (iii) determine the most promising antimicrobial combination for chronic Achromobacter infections.

There are concerns that biocide skin and mucous membrane decolonisation, which is widely used to prevent health-care-associated infections in intensive care units (ICUs), might select for multidrug-resistant pathogens. We aimed to evaluate the effects of de-escalating from universal to targeted skin and nasal decolonisation on Staphylococcus epidermidis bloodstream infections (SE-BSI). We did a retrospective, before-after-control-impact time-series analysis and longitudinal genotypic study in two ICUs with divergent decolonisation practice in tertiary care hospitals of adjacent health boards in Scotland, UK. Participants were aged at least 16 years and admitted between July 1, 2009, and Feb 28, 2022. There were no exclusion criteria for the study. In ICU one (intervention site) universal decolonisation in all admissions was de-escalated to targeted decolonisation of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers on Feb 1, 2019, while in ICU two (control site) targeted decolonisation was applied throughout. We collected bloodstream infection data from all causes, including clinically significant SE-BSI. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was used to define meticillin-resistant Sepidermidis (MRSE) and chlorhexidine susceptibility. We used multilocus sequence typing to identify sequence types from archived SE-BSI isolates. Whole-genome sequencing was applied to a sample from ICU one. The primary outcomes were incidence densities of all bloodstream infections, SE-BSI, and meticillin-resistant S epidermidis bloodstream infections (MRSE-BSI), and the percentage probability that SE-BSI were MRSE-BSI. The effects of de-escalation on primary outcomes were estimated by differences between the intervention and control sites, before and after de-escalation, using a before-after-control-impact time-series design. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of multidrug resistant sequence types, carriage of mobile genetic elements and genes for multidrug resistance and biofilm production. Between July 1, 2009, and Feb 28, 2022, S epidermidis was identified in 334 (45%) of 735 bloodstream infections in ICU one, of which 197 occurred before the de-escalation intervention in Feb 1, 2019, and S epidermidis was identified in 167 (60%) of 278 bloodstream infections in ICU two. There was no increase in all bloodstream infection incidence coinciding with de-escalation in ICU one, whereas MRSE-BSI incidence declined significantly from 10·4 cases per 1000 occupied bed days (OBDs; 95% credible interval [CrI] 7·2-15·4) to 4·3 cases per 1000 OBDs (2·5-6·7), as did the percentage probability of MRSE (from 89·2%, 95% CrI 77·8-96·5 to 56·7%, 34·3-77·5%). No significant changes in the primary outcomes were seen in ICU two. MRSE-BSI incidence density was positively associated with chlorhexidine use, but not mupirocin use. De-escalation was associated with a reduced proportion of SE-BSI due to multidrug-resistant sequence types and reduced carriage of mobile genetic elements and genes for multidrug resistance and biofilm production, as observed by multi-locus sequence typing and whole genome sequencing. In ICU settings with low MRSA incidence, the benefits of universal decolonisation should be balanced against the risks of selecting MRSE sequence types adapted for invasive and device-associated infection. National Health Service Grampian Charity.

To maintain patient flow during the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid and accurate decisions for the safe triage of geriatrics patients was essential as turnaround times for laboratory testing was ineffective at supporting rapid clinical decision-making for transfer of care. Thus, to mitigate and inform these clinical decisions, a quality improvement collaborative project with the geriatrics and virology department was conducted at the Frailty Assessment Unit (FAU) at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary. The goal was to facilitate patient triage during transfer of care with the introduction of Point of Care testing (POCT). The interventions which resulted in significant improvements were based on the fishbone problem solving approach and the driver diagram with change ideas informing the five Plan, Do, Study and Act (PDSA) cycles. The QI intervention was crucial in supporting clinical staff decision making during transfers for 95% of patients who had been clinically judged as asymptomatic for COVID-19 infection. High staff engagement was observed with 83% of staff suggesting the process map was easy to follow and 92% of clinical staff agreed it contained sufficient information to support the testing process. With POCT introduction, the proportion of patients who were transferred with an early POCT result increased by 20% in the Rosewell House group and by 65% in the community Hospitals group, once governance arrangements were in place. Finally, the considerable uptake of POCT by the ward consequently led to a decrease of up to 86% in the number of samples sent to the laboratory for rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing. The quality improvement project provided a rapid and reliable SARS-CoV-2 triage tool and was effectively integrated into the geriatrics triage algorithm to facilitate patient placement and flow.

Context: Recent advances in the development of rapid SARS-CoV-2 point of care (POC) testing provided an opportunity to aid clinical decision making in front-line healthcare settings. Perspectives of POC COVID-19 screening of pregnant women are under-researched. Objective: To assess the impact of a SARS-CoV-2 POC testing platform implemented in a busy maternity hospital, with limited isolation capacity, during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We conducted a before and after comparison of two consecutive 12-month periods and a retrospective evaluation of staff attitudes and POC test acceptance. Turnaround Time (TAT) and testing numbers were assessed by computer audit. Qualitative data was collected using confidential questionnaires. Results: Mean TAT for the POC platform was 5.3x quicker (p < 0.001, chi-square test) when compared with local virus laboratory PCR testing. Samples sent for laboratory testing reduced by almost one third, following introduction of the POC device. A total of 27 staff members completed a POC testing satisfaction survey, which documented ease of use and benefits for diagnosis assistance, patient management and patient experience. Conclusion. In this single-center maternity setting, POC testing decreased laboratory testing volume and SARS-Cov-2 result TAT for symptomatic women and those awaiting crucial investigations. POC COVID-19 investigation was deemed acceptable by the clinical team for facilitating patient placement, management, and use of limited isolation capacity.