Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Mycoplasma genitalium are the three most commonly reported sexually transmitted bacteria. The present study aimed to investigate the presence of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and M. genitalium in urogenital samples collected from 18–68-year-old Turkish patients who were admitted to the hospital with various urogenital symptoms. A total of 360 patients with symptoms of STD were included in the study. Following DNA extraction by QIAamp Mini Kit, the presence of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and M. genitalium were investigated using multiplex real-time PCR. Causative organisms were identified in 68 (18.9%) of 360 patients. C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and M. genitalium were detected in 40 (11.1%), 14 (3.9%), and 28 (7.8%) of the patients, respectively. Patients 21–30 years of age represented more than one-third (37.8%) of positive patients. Of all patients, dual infections of C. trachomatis–M. genitalium, N. gonorrhoeae–C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae–M. genitalium, and triple infection of C. trachomatis–N. gonorrhoeae–M. genitalium were determined in 1.6% (6/360), 1.3% (5/360), 0.2% (1/360), and 0.2% (1/360) of the patients, respectively. In CT-, NG-, and MG-positive patients, different STI agents were also found such as HIV, HBV, HPV, HSV2, T. pallidum, and T. vaginalis. In conclusion, among C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and M. genitalium, CT was the most frequently detected bacterial cause of STDs in our hospital at Istanbul. Co-infections, which comprise more than one-fifth of the cases, should not be underestimated. Regular screening and following up of STD agents using multiplex real-time PCR-based diagnostic methods enabling the immediate detection of co-infections are essential for the treatment and primary prevention of STDs.

Objective: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging multi-drug resistant, opportunistic pathogen in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). In this study, we aimed to assess the incidence, clinical features, antibiotic susceptibility, and treatment options of S. maltophilia infection among the healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in the neonatal unit. Methods: In this study , the patients who were hospitalized in the NICU between January 2020 and December 2021 with S. maltophilia isolated from clinical samples were included. Demographic, clinic features, and microbiological findings of the patients were retrospectively evaluated by using the medical records. The samples (lower respiratory tract, urine, peritoneal fluid) were first examined microscopically by gram preparation and cultured. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed according to the recommendations of The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) for TMP-SMX. Results: S. maltophilia was isolated in 38 clinical samples of the 20 patients who were hospitalized at the NICU between January 2020 and December 2021. A total of 40 % (n = 8) of samples from different patients were accepted as colonization. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was determined in 55 % (n = 11), and urinary tract infection in 5 % (n = 1). S. maltophilia -associated bacteremia was not detected in any of the cases. The TMP-SMX susceptibilities of the strains were as it follows: 3 (15 %) were resistant (R), 7 (28 %) were susceptible (S), and 10 (47 %) were susceptible-increased exposure (I). Three of these patients were given dual antibiotics therapy (levofloxacin plus TMP-SMX) and nine of them were given only TMP-SMX. The most common hospital-acquired infectious agents are Gram negative microorganisms (51 %), followed by coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS), Staphylococcus aureus (24 %) and S. maltophilia (24 %). Conclusion: Increasing TMP-SMX resistance and specific drug and dosage-related problems in the neonatal unit are important problems in treatment management.

Bacteremia and fungemia are significant causes of morbidity and mortality that frequently occur as co-infections with viral respiratory infections, including SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microorganisms that were isolated from the blood cultures of SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative patients and investigate their antimicrobial resistance patterns. A retrospective analysis was performed of 22,944 blood cultures sent to the laboratory between November 2020 and December 2021. Blood culture analyses were performed using the BD Bactec FX automated system. Identification was carried out using conventional methods, namely, VITEK-2 and MALDI-TOF MS. Antibacterial/antifungal susceptibility tests were performed according to EUCAST/CLSI recommendations. SARS-CoV-2 tests were performed with RT-PCR. Culture positivity was detected in 1630 samples from 652 patients. Of these 652 patients, 633 were tested for SARS-CoV-2; 118 (18.6%) were positive and 515 (81.3%) were negative. The bacteria and fungi that were isolated at the highest rate in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS) (21.5%), Escherichia coli (12.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.4%), Candida albicans (1.65%), and Candida glabrata complex (1.65%), while in the negative patients, the highest rates were for E. coli (21.3%), MR-CoNS (13.5%), K. pneumoniae (12.05%), C. albicans (2.1%), Candida parapsilosis (1.1%), and Candida tropicalis (0.9%). No statistically significant difference was determined between COVID-19-positive and negative patients in terms of detection, such as with the Pseudomonas spp., Enterococcus spp., and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the blood cultures (p > 0.05). The most common isolate was MR-CoNS in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients (p = 0.028). Acinetobacter baumannii was more frequent (p = 0.004) and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae was isolated at a higher rate (60% vs. 43%) in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative patients (p > 0.05). These findings highlight the fact that isolation procedures should not be disregarded and the distribution of bacterial/fungal agents of bloodstream infections and their antibiotic resistance should be followed up during a pandemic, such as in the case of COVID-19.

Bacteremia and fungemia are significant causes of morbidity and mortality which frequently occur as co-infections with viral respiratory infections including SARS-CoV-2. It was aimed to evaluate the microorganisms isolated from blood cultures of SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients and investigate their antimicrobial resistance patterns. A retrospective analysis was performed with the total number of 22,944 blood cultures sent to the laboratory between November 2020 and December 2021. Blood cultures were performed on the BD Bactec automated system. Identification was performed using conventional methods, VITEK-2 and MALDI-TOF MS. Antibacterial/antifungal susceptibility tests were performed according to EUCAST/CLSI recommendations. SARS-CoV-2 tests were performed with RT-PCR. It was detected 1,630 culture positivity belonging to 652 patients. Totally 633 of 652 patients were tested for SARS-CoV-2; 118 (18.6%) were positive and 515 (81.3%) were negative. The bacteria and fungi isolated at the high-est rate in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were methicillin-resistant coagulase negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS) (21.5%), Escherichia coli (12.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.4%), Candida albicans (1.65%) and Candida glabrata complex (1.65%); while in negative patients, E. coli (21.3%), MR-CoNS (13.5%), K. pneumoniae (12.05%), C. albicans (2.1%), Candida parapsilosis (1.1%) and Candida tropicalis (0.9%). The fact that the most common isolate was MR-CoNS in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients (p = 0.028); the detection of Acinetobacter baumannii was more frequent (p = 0.001) and the isolation of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae was at a higher rate than in SARS-CoV-2 negative patients; also, the increase in multidrug-resistant strains indicate that healthcare-associated infec-tions should not be disregarded while focusing on the outbreak.

Background/Objectives: Patients with rheumatic diseases have an increased burden of infection owing to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapy. Therefore, vaccination is crucial for the prevention of infection in these patients. In this case–control study, we aimed to evaluate vaccine response to hepatitis B, pneumococcus, and measles using antibody titers in patients undergoing biological therapy. Methods: This study included 16 patients aged 5–18 years of age who received bDMARD treatment and 20 healthy controls. Serum samples of the patients were collected at baseline and subsequently on the 3rd and 6th months after bDMARD therapy, and IgG antibodies against pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide antigen (PCP), measles, and hepatitis B were measured. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in mean anti-HBsAg, anti-PCP, and anti-measles antibody titers between the study and control groups. The percentages of patients with anti-HbsAg, anti-PCP, and anti-measles protective antibodies were 68.8% (n = 11/16), 100% (n = 16/16), and 56.25% (n = 9/16), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean antibody titers at baseline and 3rd month. Only the anti-measles IgG titer level decreased below 200 (mIU/mL) in one patient in the 3rd month and in two patients in the 6th month. Conclusions: Patients with low or declining hepatitis B and measles antibody titers before or during bDMARD treatment may require close monitoring to ensure adequate protection against vaccine-preventable diseases. Regular screening and follow-up are essential in this patient population.