Background: Despite their potential for adverse health effects, skin-lightening products remain popular among South Asian Americans. Objective: This study investigates attitudes toward skin tone and the prevalence and adverse effects of skin-lightening product use among South Asian Americans. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study, recruiting and surveying 175 women or nonbinary individuals meeting the following inclusion criteria: (1) lived in the United States, (2) identified as South Asian, and (3) were raised by parents born in South Asian countries. Results: Of the 175 participants, 55 (31%) respondents used a skin-lightening product before. Parental pressure to use skin-lightening products and decreased time spent in the United States were significantly associated with skin-lightening product use (odds ratio [OR] 8.51, 95% CI 3.33-21.78, P<.001, and OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.96, P=.03, respectively). Although only 6 of the 55 (11%) users reported being aware of the potential side effects of skin-lightening products, 33 (60%) reported adverse effects, with acne, skin sensitivity, and dry skin being the most common. Users and nonusers equally endorsed statements associating lighter skin with increased attractiveness (P=.31), marriageability (P=.94), social status (P=.98), self-esteem (P=.73), and respect received from others (P=.74). Conclusions: The use of skin-lightening products among South Asian Americans is common and linked to social and psychological factors. Parental pressure and cultural beauty standards may play a significant role in perpetuating this practice. This study highlights the need for educational campaigns about the potential health risks associated with skin-lightening and increased efforts to challenge harmful beauty standards.

Background/Aims: Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) disproportionately affects individuals of African ancestry. In these patients’ eyes, a large cup-to-disc ratio (LCDR > 0.90) suggests greater retinal ganglion cell loss, though these patients often display varied visual ability. This study investigated the prevalence and risk factors associated with LCDR in African ancestry individuals with POAG and explored the differences between blind (>20/200) and not blind (≤20/200) LCDR eyes. Methods: A case–control methodology was used to investigate the demographic, optic disc, and genetic risk factors of subjects in the Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics Study. Risk factors were analyzed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models with inter-eye correlation adjusted using generalized estimating equations. Results: Out of 5605 eyes with POAG, 1440 eyes (25.7%) had LCDR. In the multivariable analysis, LCDR was associated with previous glaucoma surgery (OR = 1.72), increased intraocular pressure (OR = 1.04), decreased mean deviation (OR = 1.08), increased pattern standard deviation (OR = 1.06), thinner retinal nerve fiber layer (OR = 1.05), nasalization of vessels (OR = 2.67), bayonetting of vessels (OR = 1.98), visible pores in the lamina cribrosa (OR = 1.68), and a bean-shaped cup (OR = 2.11). Of LCDR eyes, 30.1% were classified as blind (≤20/200). In the multivariable analysis, the statistically significant risk factors of blindness in LCDR eyes were previous glaucoma surgery (OR = 1.72), increased intraocular pressure (OR = 1.05), decreased mean deviation (OR = 1.04), and decreased pattern standard deviation (OR = 0.90). Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of close monitoring of intraocular pressure and visual function in African ancestry POAG patients, particularly those with LCDR, to preserve visual function.

Background/Objectives: Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness, disproportionately affecting individuals of African ancestry. Limited research has examined the impact of neighbourhood quality and socioeconomic factors on primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) risk in this population. This study aims to address these gaps by evaluating associations between ocular health and neighbourhood characteristics using geospatial data. Subjects/Methods: We conducted a case-control study with 5192 African ancestry individuals from the Philadelphia area using data from the Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) study. Geocoded U.S. Census data were merged with individual-level demographics and neighbourhood-level measures, including air quality, food accessibility, and socioeconomic indicators, to assess their association with glaucoma risk and severity. Results: The study included 3039 controls (58.5%) and 2153 POAG cases (41.5%). Higher POAG risk was associated with older age (OR 1.72 per 10-year increase, p < 0.001), male gender (OR 2.04, p < 0.001), lower BMI (OR 0.87 per 10 kg/m² increase, p = 0.003), and nonuse of alcohol (OR 0.56 for alcohol use, p < 0.001). Low food access was more common in controls (OR 0.86, p = 0.03), and severe POAG cases were associated with lower homeownership rates (OR 0.95 per 10% increase, p = 0.049). However, most socioeconomic and environmental factors (air quality, education, income, occupation, family structure) were not significantly linked to POAG risk or severity. Conclusion: Socioeconomic status did not significantly protect against POAG in African ancestry individuals. Individual factors were more influential, suggesting neighbourhood and socioeconomic factors may have a lesser impact than previously hypothesised.

Both vulnerabilities to COVID-19 and childhood trauma have deep roots in health inequities. Children of color especially risk severe COVID-19 illness, with long-term effects that amplify existing health disparities, including trauma exposure. Similarly, children of color report more adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) than non-Hispanic White children. ACEs and other potentially traumatic events are associated with lifelong physical and psychological health problems. Policy must prioritize health equity (the absence of differences in health care access, quality, and outcomes based on ethnicity, race, and socioeconomic status). A trauma-informed approach emphasizes recovery and resilience. Principles of health equity can join with trauma-informed policy and practice for families and communities to help mitigate the effects of childhood trauma during the pandemic and beyond.

While it has been well established that advanced glaucoma is associated with a large cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), it is not known if the shape of the cup, particularly excavated cups with expanded lower portions (bean-pot cups), play any additional role in glaucomatous damage. We investigated this among individuals of African ancestry, a population that is more vulnerable to glaucoma than any other ethnic group. Case-control study Of 3,255 eyes, a total of 1,339 (41.1%) exhibit a conical cup shape, 1,470 (45.2%) have a cylindrical cup shape, and 446 (13.7%) display a bean-pot cup shape. Compared to other cup morphology, bean-pot cups are significantly associated with lower MD, larger CDR, higher IOP, thinner RNFL, and worse VA in logMAR (all p<0.001). Genetic analysis does not show any association between various genetic variants and cup shape. Factors independently predictive of bean-pot cupping include younger age at diagnosis (aOR 0.96 per 1 year increase in age of enrollment, p<0.0001), CDR (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.87, p<0.0001), and the presence of certain optic disc features, including visible pores in the LC (aOR 2.76, p<0.0001), nasalization of vessels (aOR 2.64, p<0.0001), and vessel bayonetting (aOR 2.94, p<0.0001). This study shows the clinical significance of different cup shapes in glaucoma in an African ancestry population and suggests that bean-pot cups are associated with the most severe glaucomatous damage, independent of cup-disc ratio. This association should be taken into account while determining prognosis following glaucoma interventions.

Objective: To investigate outcomes of trabeculectomy ab externo in African ancestry primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients, and to analyze the impact of demographic and phenotypic factors on surgical success and complication rates. Patients and Methods: A retrospective case-control study enrolled 63 eyes of 55 POAG cases who underwent trabeculectomy ab externo. Data on demographics, family glaucoma history, surgical specifics, and pre/postoperative measures (intraocular pressure, visual acuity, visual field, medication usage, complications within one year) were collected. Analysis included linear/logistic regression models adjusting for inter-eye correlation. Results: Trabeculectomy yielded success without additional medication in 46%, qualified success with medication in 22%, and surgical failure necessitating further intervention in 32% within one year. Subjects experienced reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) (46%), daily glaucoma medication (73%), and eye drop usage (67%) 1-year post-trabeculectomy (all P<0.001). However, there was a postoperative decline of 56% in visual acuity (VA) (P<0.001) and a significant worsening of visual field parameters, including a 14% decrease in mean deviation (P=0.02) and a 19% decrease in visual field index (P=0.004). Top of FormBottom of Form59% of patient eyes experienced complications within one year of surgery. Univariate analysis of predictive factors for surgical outcomes revealed that younger age at surgery (P=0.01) and family history of glaucoma (P=0.046) were predictive of lower rates of surgical success. Multivariable analysis revealed worse preoperative VA (OR 0.79 per 0.1 LogMAR increases, P=0.02) was associated with lower likelihood of surgical success. Conclusion: This study underscores the low rates of trabeculectomy success and high rates of complications in an African ancestry population with POAG. While the procedure exhibited positive effects on IOP control and medication reduction, our analysis found that multiple factors, particularly age, family history, and worse preoperative VA play crucial roles in influencing surgical success. Précis: Trabeculectomy in African ancestry individuals with primary open-angle glaucoma shows a 46% success rate and frequent complications, indicating that younger age and family history are significant predictors of surgical failure in this high-risk population.