Judith M. Boer

Dr. Judith M. Boer

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 March 2011 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRezaul Karim
Rezaul Karim
CMCraig Meyers
Craig Meyers
CBClaude Backendorf
Claude Backendorf
KLKristina Ludigs
Kristina Ludigs
RORienk Offringa
Rienk Offringa
JBJudith M. Boer
Judith M. Boer
Despite the presence of intracellular pathogen recognition receptors that allow infected cells to attract the immune system, undifferentiated keratinocytes (KCs) are the main targets for latent infection with high-risk human papilloma viruses (hrHPVs). HPV infections are transient but on average last for more than one year suggesting that HPV has developed means to evade host immunity. To understand how HPV persists, we studied the innate immune response of undifferentiated human KCs harboring episomal copies of HPV16 and 18 by genome-wide expression profiling. Our data showed that the expression of the different virus-sensing receptors was not affected by the presence of HPV. Poly(I:C) stimulation of the viral RNA receptors TLR3, PKR, MDA5 and RIG-I, the latter of which indirectly senses viral DNA through non-self RNA polymerase III transcripts, showed dampening in downstream signalling of these receptors by HPVs. Many of the genes downregulated in HPV-positive KCs involved components of the antigen presenting pathway, the inflammasome, the production of antivirals, pro-inflammatory and chemotactic cytokines, and components downstream of activated pathogen receptors. Notably, gene and/or protein interaction analysis revealed the downregulation of a network of genes that was strongly interconnected by IL-1β, a crucial cytokine to activate adaptive immunity. In summary, our comprehensive expression profiling approach revealed that HPV16 and 18 coordinate a broad deregulation of the keratinocyte's inflammatory response, and contributes to the understanding of virus persistence.

25 April 2022 in Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EPEdoardo Pennesi
Edoardo Pennesi
NMNaomi Michels
Naomi Michels
EBErica Brivio
Erica Brivio
VVVincent Van der Velden
Vincent Van der Velden
YJYilin Jiang
Yilin Jiang
C Michel ZwaanC Michel Zwaan
C Michel Zwaan
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin is a CD22-directed antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, approved in adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Patients aged 1–18 years, with R/R CD22 + BCP-ALL were treated at the RP2D of 1.8 mg/m2. Using a single-stage design, with an overall response rate (ORR) ≤ 30% defined as not promissing and ORR > 55% as expected, 25 patients needed to be recruited to achieve 80% power at 0.05 significance level. Thirty-two patients were enrolled, 28 were treated, 27 were evaluable for response. The estimated ORR was 81.5% (95%CI: 61.9–93.7%), and 81.8% (18/22) of the responding subjects were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative. The study met its primary endpoint. Median follow up of survivors was 16 months (IQR: 14.49–20.07). One year Event Free Survival was 36.7% (95% CI: 22.2–60.4%), and Overall Survival was 55.1% (95% CI: 39.1−77.7%). Eighteen patients received consolidation (with HSCT and/or CAR T-cells therapy). Sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) occurred in seven patients. MRD negativity seemed correlated to calicheamicin sensitivity in vitro, but not to CD22 surface expression, saturation, or internalization. InO was effective in this population. The most relevant risk was the occurrence of SOS, particularly when InO treatment was followed by HSCT.

1 July 2021 in Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJudith M. Boer
Judith M. Boer
MVMaria Grazia Valsecchi
Maria Grazia Valsecchi
FHFemke M. Hormann
Femke M. Hormann
ŽAŽeljko Antić
Željko Antić
MZMarketa Zaliova
Marketa Zaliova
RPRob Pieters
Rob Pieters

28 September 2022 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KLKarin Langenberg
Karin Langenberg
MMMichael T. Meister
Michael T. Meister
JBJette J. Bakhuizen
Jette J. Bakhuizen
JBJudith M. Boer
Judith M. Boer
NENatasha K.A. van Eijkelenburg
Natasha K.A. van Eijkelenburg
JMJan Molenaar
Jan Molenaar
ITHER is a Dutch prospective national precision oncology program aiming to define tumour molecular profiles in children and adolescents with primary very high-risk, relapsed, or refractory paediatric tumours. Between April 2017 and April 2021, 302 samples from 253 patients were included. Comprehensive molecular profiling including low-coverage whole genome sequencing (lcWGS), whole exome sequencing (WES), RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), Affymetrix, and/or 850k methylation profiling was successfully performed for 226 samples with at least 20% tumour content. Germline pathogenic variants were identified in 16% of patients (35/219), of which 22 variants were judged causative for a cancer predisposition syndrome. At least one somatic alteration was detected in 204 (90.3%), and 185 (81.9%) were considered druggable, with clinical priority very high (6.1%), high (21.3%), moderate (26.0%), intermediate (36.1%), and borderline (10.5%) priority. iTHER led to revision or refinement of diagnosis in 8 patients (3.5%). Temporal heterogeneity was observed in paired samples of 15 patients, indicating the value of sequential analyses.

14 March 2019 in Haematologica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FHFemke M. Hormann
Femke M. Hormann
AHAlex Q. Hoogkamer
Alex Q. Hoogkamer
HBH. Berna Beverloo
H. Berna Beverloo
ABAurélie Boeree
Aurélie Boeree
IDIlse Dingjan
Ilse Dingjan
JBJudith M. Boer
Judith M. Boer

7 September 2010 in BMC Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MIMaarten van Iterson
Maarten van Iterson
JBJudith M. Boer
Judith M. Boer
RMRenée X Menezes
Renée X Menezes
Background: In high-dimensional data analysis such as differential gene expression analysis, people often use filtering methods like fold-change or variance filters in an attempt to reduce the multiple testing penalty and improve power. However, filtering may introduce a bias on the multiple testing correction. The precise amount of bias depends on many quantities, such as fraction of probes filtered out, filter statistic and test statistic used.Results: We show that a biased multiple testing correction results if non-differentially expressed probes are not filtered out with equal probability from the entire range of p-values. We illustrate our results using both a simulation study and an experimental dataset, where the FDR is shown to be biased mostly by filters that are associated with the hypothesis being tested, such as the fold change. Filters that induce little bias on the FDR yield less additional power of detecting differentially expressed genes. Finally, we propose a statistical test that can be used in practice to determine whether any chosen filter introduces bias on the FDR estimate used, given a general experimental setup.Conclusions: Filtering out of probes must be used with care as it may bias the multiple testing correction. Researchers can use our test for FDR bias to guide their choice of filter and amount of filtering in practice.