Eduardo A. B. Almeida

Dr. Eduardo A. B. Almeida

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 January 2013 in Annual Review of Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BDBryan N. Danforth
Bryan N. Danforth
SCSophie Cardinal
Sophie Cardinal
CPChristophe Praz
Christophe Praz
EAEduardo A. B. Almeida
Eduardo A. B. Almeida
DMDenis Michez
Denis Michez
Our understanding of bee phylogeny has improved over the past fifteen years as a result of new data, primarily nucleotide sequence data, and new methods, primarily model-based methods of phylogeny reconstruction. Phylogenetic studies based on single or, more commonly, multilocus data sets have helped resolve the placement of bees within the superfamily Apoidea; the relationships among the seven families of bees; and the relationships among bee subfamilies, tribes, genera, and species. In addition, molecular phylogenies have played an important role in inferring evolutionary patterns and processes in bees. Phylogenies have provided the comparative framework for understanding the evolution of host-plant associations and pollen specialization, the evolution of social behavior, and the evolution of parasitism. In this paper, we present an overview of significant discoveries in bee phylogeny based primarily on the application of molecular data. We review the phylogenetic hypotheses family-by-family and then describe how the new phylogenetic insights have altered our understanding of bee biology.

1 January 2019 in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SBSilas Bossert
Silas Bossert
EMElizabeth A. Murray
Elizabeth A. Murray
EAEduardo A. B. Almeida
Eduardo A. B. Almeida
SBSeán G. Brady
Seán G. Brady
BBBonnie B. Blaimer
Bonnie B. Blaimer
BDBryan N. Danforth
Bryan N. Danforth
Two increasingly popular approaches to reconstruct the Tree of Life involve whole transcriptome sequencing and the target capture of ultraconserved elements (UCEs). Both methods can be used to generate large, multigene datasets for analysis of phylogenetic relationships in non-model organisms. While targeted exon sequencing across divergent lineages is now a standard method, it is still not clear if UCE data can be readily combined with published transcriptomes. In this study, we evaluate the combination of UCEs and transcriptomes in a single analysis using genome-, transcriptome-, and UCE data for 79 bees in the largest and most biologically diverse bee family, Apidae. Using existing tools, we first developed a workflow to assemble phylogenomic data from different sources and produced two large nucleotide matrices of combined data. We then reconstructed the phylogeny of the Apidae using concatenation- and coalescent-based methods, and critically evaluated the resulting phylogenies in the context of previously published genetic, genomic, and morphological data sets. Our estimated phylogenetic trees are robustly supported and largely congruent with previous molecular hypotheses, from deep nodes to shallow species-level phylogenies. Moreover, the combined approach allows us to resolve controversial nodes of the apid Tree of Life, by clarifying the relationships among the genera of orchid bees (Euglossini) and the monophyly of the Centridini. Additionally, we present novel phylogenetic evidence supporting the monophyly of the diverse clade of cleptoparasitic Apidae and the placement of two enigmatic, oil-collecting genera (Ctenoplectra and Tetrapedia). Lastly, we propose a revised classification of the family Apidae that reflects our improved understanding of apid higher-level relationships.

21 December 2021 in Systematic Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBSilas Bossert
Silas Bossert
TWThomas Wood
Thomas Wood
SPSébastien Patiny
Sébastien Patiny
DMDenis Michez
Denis Michez
EAEduardo A. B. Almeida
Eduardo A. B. Almeida
EMElizabeth A. Murray
Elizabeth A. Murray

6 December 2011 in Journal of Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EAEduardo A. B. Almeida
Eduardo A. B. Almeida
MPMarcio R. Pie
Marcio R. Pie
SBSeán G. Brady
Seán G. Brady
BDBryan N. Danforth
Bryan N. Danforth

27 July 2023 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EAEduardo A. B. Almeida
Eduardo A. B. Almeida
SBSilas Bossert
Silas Bossert
BDBryan N. Danforth
Bryan N. Danforth
DPDiego S. Porto
Diego S. Porto
FFFelipe V. Freitas
Felipe V. Freitas
MPMarcio R. Pie
Marcio R. Pie

23 February 2017 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CGChristoph Grüter
Christoph Grüter
FSFrancisca H. I. D. Segers
Francisca H. I. D. Segers
CMCristiano Menezes
Cristiano Menezes
AVAyrton Vollet-Neto
Ayrton Vollet-Neto
TFTiago Falcón
Tiago Falcón
EAEduardo A. B. Almeida
Eduardo A. B. Almeida
The differentiation of workers into morphological castes represents an important evolutionary innovation that is thought to improve division of labor in insect societies. Given the potential benefits of task-related worker differentiation, it is puzzling that physical worker castes, such as soldiers, are extremely rare in social bees and absent in wasps. Following the recent discovery of soldiers in a stingless bee, we studied the occurrence of worker differentiation in 28 stingless bee species from Brazil and found that several species have specialized soldiers for colony defence. Our results reveal that worker differentiation evolved repeatedly during the last ~ 25 million years and coincided with the emergence of parasitic robber bees, a major threat to many stingless bee species. Furthermore, our data suggest that these robbers are a driving force behind the evolution of worker differentiation as targets of robber bees are four times more likely to have nest guards of increased size than non-targets. These findings reveal unexpected diversity in the social organization of stingless bees.