Lumbar intervertebral disc herniation is a common cause of low back and radicular leg pain, traditionally managed with a combination of conservative therapies and, when indicated, surgical discectomy. An intriguing phenomenon observed in many patients is the spontaneous resorption of herniated disc material over time, often correlating with significant symptom improvement. This article is presented as a narrative review synthesizing experimental, imaging, and clinical literature relevant to spontaneous disc resorption and its implications for clinical decision-making. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of spontaneous disc herniation resorption, exploring the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and the factors that predict which herniations are likely to regress without surgery. Key mechanisms include inflammatory-mediated degradation of disc fragments, neovascularization with macrophage infiltration and phagocytosis of extruded nucleus pulposus tissue, and biological processes such as enzymatic matrix breakdown and cellular apoptosis that collectively lead to shrinkage of the herniated mass. Patient and disc characteristics that favour spontaneous resorption are identified, such as younger age, extruded or sequestered fragment type, larger initial herniation size, and robust inflammatory response on imaging, whereas certain chronic degenerative changes may reduce this likelihood. We also review current clinical guidelines and expert recommendations on when surgical intervention is warranted versus when conservative management and observation are appropriate. Understanding the probability of natural disc fragment resolution is critical in guiding treatment decisions. In the absence of severe neurological deficits or intractable pain, a period of non-operative management can often be pursued safely, given that the majority of patients experience substantial relief within a few months as discs regress. Conversely, timely surgery is advised for those with neurological compromise or refractory symptoms. By synthesizing the latest evidence on spontaneous disc herniation resorption and its predictors, this review aims to assist neurosurgeons and spine specialists in optimizing patient selection for conservative care and identifying the proper timing for surgical intervention to achieve the best clinical outcomes. Given the narrative design, conclusions are based on synthesis of heterogeneous evidence rather than formal comparative analysis.

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment disorder, with a lifetime prevalence estimated at approximately 10%. This narrative review explores the historical evolution, current management strategies, and emerging trends in CTS diagnosis and treatment. Early recognition of CTS led to the development of conservative interventions, including splinting, corticosteroid injections, and physical therapy, aimed at alleviating median nerve compression and associated symptoms. The advent of open carpal tunnel release established surgery as the definitive treatment for moderate-to-severe CTS, with subsequent refinements—such as mini-open and endoscopic techniques—focused on minimizing tissue trauma and expediting recovery. Comparative studies demonstrate similar long-term efficacy between surgical modalities, though endoscopic approaches often provide faster short-term recovery. Advances in diagnostic imaging, including high-resolution ultrasound, have improved early detection and dynamic assessment of median nerve compression. Emerging therapies, such as regenerative biologics, neuromobilization, and minimally invasive surgical innovations, offer promising adjuncts to current care. Despite substantial progress, further research is needed to clarify optimal patient selection, refine minimally invasive techniques, and explore regenerative interventions. This review underscores the importance of individualized, evidence-based, and patient-centered approaches to CTS management, integrating both established and emerging strategies to optimize functional outcomes and quality of life.

Computed tomography (CT) is an essential tool in diagnosing and treating traumatic brain injury (TBI). Marshall CT classification, Rotterdam and Helsinki CT scores were consecutively developed as prediction outcome scales by computing TBI CT abnorm...

Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures are among the most common midfacial injuries, with significant implications for both function and facial esthetics. Optimal management requires restoring the normal anatomical alignment and symmetry of the zygomatic region to prevent long-term deformity and functional deficits. However, the decision-making surrounding surgical intervention, particularly in isolated ZMC fractures with moderate displacement, remains nuanced. This review discusses contemporary surgical approaches for isolated ZMC fractures and examines how objective morphometric analysis can guide critical decisions such as the timing of surgery, choice of surgical approach, and extent of fixation. Conventional assessment tools like computed tomography (CT), cephalometric measurements, and intraoperative imaging provide foundational data on fracture anatomy. Emerging technologies, including three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry, stereophotogrammetry, artificial intelligence (AI)-based symmetry analysis, and surgical navigation systems, offer advanced means to quantify facial symmetry and bone alignment. By integrating these objective metrics into clinical practice, surgeons can enhance preoperative planning and postoperative outcome evaluation, with a particular focus on achieving facial symmetry for optimal esthetic and functional results. We also outline clinical decision-making frameworks that incorporate quantitative measurements, and we discuss current limitations, future directions, and the potential for standardizing protocols in the management of ZMC fractures.

Neurosurgery is undergoing a significant transformation driven by advances in biomaterials and tissue engineering. These interdisciplinary innovations address challenges in repairing and regenerating neural tissues, integrating cranial and spinal implants, and improving patient outcomes. The incidence of neurological injuries such as traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury remains high, underscoring the need for improved therapeutic strategies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current biomaterial and tissue engineering approaches in neurosurgery, highlighting developments in neural tissue repair, cranial and spinal implants, spinal cord injury treatment, and peripheral nerve regeneration. Key challenges—such as ensuring biocompatibility, modulating the immune response, and bridging the gap between laboratory research and clinical application—are discussed. Emerging technologies including 3D bioprinting, nanotechnology (removing microfluidics), and microfluidics are examined for their potential to revolutionize neurosurgical treatments. The need for interdisciplinary collaboration among neurosurgeons, material scientists, and biologists is emphasized as critical for overcoming translational barriers and accelerating the clinical translation of these promising technologies.