Roswitha Schröder

Dr. Roswitha Schröder


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 August 2012 in BMC Plant Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RARoss G Atkinson
Ross G Atkinson
PSPaul W Sutherland
Paul W Sutherland
SJSebastian L Johnston
Sebastian L Johnston
KGKularajathevan Gunaseelan
Kularajathevan Gunaseelan
IHIan C Hallett
Ian C Hallett
RSRobert J Schaffer
Robert J Schaffer
Background: While there is now a significant body of research correlating apple (Malusxdomestica) fruit softening with the cell wall hydrolaseENDO-POLYGALACTURONASE1 (PG1), there is currently little knowledge of its physiological effectsin planta. This study examined the effect of down regulation of PG1 expression in ‘Royal Gala’ apples, a cultivar that typically has high levels of PG1, and softens during fruit ripening.Results: PG1-suppressed ‘Royal Gala’ apples harvested from multiple seasons were firmer than controls after ripening, and intercellular adhesion was higher. Cell wall analyses indicated changes in yield and composition of pectin, and a higher molecular weight distribution of CDTA-soluble pectin. Structural analyses revealed more ruptured cells and free juice in pulled apart sections, suggesting improved integrity of intercellular connections and consequent cell rupture due to failure of the primary cell walls under stress.PG1-suppressed lines also had reduced expansion of cells in the hypodermis of ripe apples, resulting in more densely packed cells in this layer. This change in morphology appears to be linked with reduced transpirational water loss in the fruit.Conclusions: These findings confirm PG1’s role in apple fruit softening and suggests that this is achieved in part by reducing cellular adhesion. This is consistent with previous studies carried out in strawberry but not with those performed in tomato. In apple PG1 also appears to influence other fruit texture characters such as juiciness and water loss.

1 January 2013 in BMC Plant Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JNJovyn Kt Ng
Jovyn Kt Ng
RSRoswitha Schröder
Roswitha Schröder
PSPaul W Sutherland
Paul W Sutherland
IHIan C Hallett
Ian C Hallett
MHMiriam I Hall
Miriam I Hall
JJJason William Johnston
Jason William Johnston
There is a paucity of information regarding development of fruit tissue microstructure and changes in the cell walls during fruit growth, and how these developmental processes differ between cultivars with contrasting softening behaviour. In this study we compare two apple cultivars that show different softening rates during fruit development and ripening. We investigate whether these different softening behaviours manifest themselves late during ethylene-induced softening in the ripening phase, or early during fruit expansion and maturation.


22 September 2012 in Planta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SJSarah L. Johnston
Sarah L. Johnston
RPRoneel Prakash
Roneel Prakash
NCNancy J. Chen
Nancy J. Chen
MKMonto H. Kumagai
Monto H. Kumagai
HTHelen M. Turano
Helen M. Turano
RSRoswitha Schröder
Roswitha Schröder

1 December 2023 in The Plant Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KGKularajathevan Gunaseelan
Kularajathevan Gunaseelan
RSRoswitha Schröder
Roswitha Schröder
RRRia Rebstock
Ria Rebstock
ANAnnu S. Ninan
Annu S. Ninan
Cecilia DengCecilia Deng
Cecilia Deng
RARoss G. Atkinson
Ross G. Atkinson
SUMMARY: During fruit ripening, polygalacturonases (PGs) are key contributors to the softening process in many species. Apple is a crisp fruit that normally exhibits only minor changes to cell walls and limited fruit softening. Here, we explore the effects of PG overexpression during fruit development using transgenic apple lines overexpressing the ripening‐related endo‐POLYGALACTURONASE1 gene. MdPG1‐overexpressing (PGox) fruit displayed early maturation/ripening with black seeds, conversion of starch to sugars and ethylene production occurring by 80 days after pollination (DAP). PGox fruit exhibited a striking, white‐skinned phenotype that was evident from 60 DAP and most likely resulted from increased air spaces and separation of cells in the hypodermis due to degradation of the middle lamellae. Irregularities in the integrity of the epidermis and cuticle were also observed. By 120 DAP, PGox fruit cracked and showed lenticel‐associated russeting. Increased cuticular permeability was associated with microcracks in the cuticle around lenticels and was correlated with reduced cortical firmness at all time points and extensive post‐harvest water loss from the fruit, resulting in premature shrivelling. Transcriptomic analysis suggested that early maturation was associated with upregulation of genes involved in stress responses, and overexpression of MdPG1 also altered the expression of genes involved in cell wall metabolism (e.g. β‐galactosidase, MD15G1221000) and ethylene biosynthesis (e.g. ACC synthase, MD14G1111500). The results show that upregulation of PG not only has dramatic effects on the structure of the fruit outer cell layers, indirectly affecting water status and turgor, but also has unexpected consequences for fruit development.

10 May 2017 in BMC Plant Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRoneel Prakash
Roneel Prakash
IHIan C. Hallett
Ian C. Hallett
SWSally F. Wong
Sally F. Wong
SJSebastian L Johnston
Sebastian L Johnston
EOErin M. O’dOnoghue
Erin M. O’dOnoghue
RSRoswitha Schröder
Roswitha Schröder
Unlike in abscission or dehiscence, fruit of kiwifruit Actinidia eriantha develop the ability for peel detachment when they are ripe and soft in the absence of a morphologically identifiable abscission zone. Two closely-related genotypes with contrasting detachment behaviour have been identified. The ‘good-peeling’ genotype has detachment with clean debonding of cells, and a peel tissue that does not tear. The ‘poor-peeling’ genotype has poor detachability, with cells that rupture upon debonding, and peel tissue that fragments easily. Structural studies indicated that peel detachability in both genotypes occurred in the outer pericarp beneath the hypodermis. Immunolabelling showed differences in methylesterification of pectin, where the interface of labelling coincided with the location of detachment in the good-peeling genotype, whereas in the poor-peeling genotype, no such interface existed. This zone of difference in methylesterification was enhanced by differential cell wall changes between the peel and outer pericarp tissue. Although both genotypes expressed two polygalacturonase genes, no enzyme activity was detected in the good-peeling genotype, suggesting limited pectin breakdown, keeping cell walls strong without tearing or fragmentation of the peel and flesh upon detachment. Differences in location and amounts of wall-stiffening galactan in the peel of the good-peeling genotype possibly contributed to this phenotype. Hemicellulose-acting transglycosylases were more active in the good-peeling genotype, suggesting an influence on peel flexibility by remodelling their substrates during development of detachability. High xyloglucanase activity in the peel of the good-peeling genotype may contribute by having a strengthening effect on the cellulose-xyloglucan network. In fruit of A. eriantha, peel detachability is due to the establishment of a zone of discontinuity created by differential cell wall changes in peel and outer pericarp tissues that lead to changes in mechanical properties of the peel. During ripening, the peel becomes flexible and the cells continue to adhere strongly to each other, preventing breakage, whereas the underlying outer pericarp loses cell wall strength as softening proceeds. Together these results reveal a novel and interesting mechanism for enabling cell separation.