Michael Günther

Dr. Michael Günther


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2002 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAndre Seyfarth
Andre Seyfarth
HGHartmut Geyer
Hartmut Geyer
MGMichael Günther
Michael Günther
RBReinhard Blickhan
Reinhard Blickhan

17 November 2006 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBReinhard Blickhan
Reinhard Blickhan
ASAndre Seyfarth
Andre Seyfarth
HGHartmut Geyer
Hartmut Geyer
SGSten Grimmer
Sten Grimmer
HWHeiko Wagner
Heiko Wagner
MGMichael Günther
Michael Günther
Research on the biomechanics of animal and human locomotion provides insight into basic principles of locomotion and respective implications for construction and control. Nearly elastic operation of the leg is necessary to reproduce the basic dynamics in walking and running. Elastic leg operation can be modelled with a spring-mass model. This model can be used as a template with respect to both gaits in the construction and control of legged machines. With respect to the segmented leg, the humanoid arrangement saves energy and ensures structural stability. With the quasi-elastic operation the leg inherits the property of self-stability, i.e. the ability to stabilize a system in the presence of disturbances without sensing the disturbance or its direct effects. Self-stability can be conserved in the presence of musculature with its crucial damping property. To ensure secure foothold visco-elastic suspended muscles serve as shock absorbers. Experiments with technically implemented leg models, which explore some of these principles, are promising.

1 April 2014 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DHD.F.B. Haeufle
D.F.B. Haeufle
MGMichael Günther
Michael Günther
ABA. Bayer
A. Bayer
SSSyn Schmitt
Syn Schmitt

1 November 2002 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMichael Günther
Michael Günther
RBReinhard Blickhan
Reinhard Blickhan

15 September 2008 in Journal of Experimental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGSten Grimmer
Sten Grimmer
MEMichael Ernst
Michael Ernst
MGMichael Günther
Michael Günther
RBReinhard Blickhan
Reinhard Blickhan
SUMMARY: Human running is characterized by comparably simple whole-body dynamics. These dynamics can be modelled with a point mass bouncing on a spring leg. Theoretical studies using such spring–mass models predict that running can be self-stable. In simulations, this self-stability allows for running on uneven ground without paying attention to the ground irregularities. Whether humans actually use this property of the mechanical system in such an irregular environment is, however, unclear. One way to approach this question is to study how the leg stiffness in stance and the leg orientation in flight are changed in response to ground perturbations. Here, for 11 human subjects we studied two consecutive contacts during running on uneven ground with a force plate of adjustable height (step of +5, +10 and +15 cm). We found that runners adjust their leg stiffness to the height of a vertical step. The adjustment is characterized by a 9% increase in leg stiffness in preparation for the perturbation and by a systematic decrease in proportion to the step height. At the highest vertical step (+15 cm), leg stiffness was reduced by about 26%. We also observed that the angle of attack decreased from 68 deg. to 62 deg. with increasing ground height. These leg adjustments are in accordance with the predictions of a stable spring–mass system. Furthermore, we could describe the identified leg forces and leg compressions with a simple spring–mass simulation for a given body mass, leg stiffness, angle of attack and initial conditions. We compared the experimental findings with the self-stabilizing properties of the spring–mass model, and discuss how humans use a combination of strategies that include purely mechanical self-stabilization and active neuromuscular control. Finally, beyond self-stability, we suggest that control may apply to smooth centre of mass kinematics.

20 May 2003 in Biological Cybernetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMichael Günther
Michael Günther
HRHanns Ruder
Hanns Ruder