Periodontitis (PD) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are immunoinflammatory diseases where leukocyte infiltration and inflammatory mediators induce alveolar bone loss, synovitis, and joint destruction, respectively. Thus, we reviewed the relationship between both diseases considering epidemiological aspects, mechanical periodontal treatment, inflammatory mediators, oral microbiota, and antibodies, using the keywords “periodontitis” and “rheumatoid arthritis” in PubMed database between January 2012 and March 2015, resulting in 162 articles. After critical reading based on titles and abstracts and following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 26 articles were included. In the articles, women over 40 years old, smokers and nonsmokers, mainly constituted the analyzed groups. Eight studies broached the epidemiological relationship with PD and RA. Four trials demonstrated that the periodontal treatment influenced the severity of RA and periodontal clinical parameters. Nine studies were related with bacteria influence in the pathogenesis of RA and the presence of citrullinated proteins, autoantibodies, or rheumatoid factor in patients with PD and RA. Five studies investigated the presence of mediators of inflammation in PD and RA. In summary, the majority of the articles have confirmed that there is a correlation between PD and RA, since both disorders have characteristics in common and result from an imbalance in the immunoinflammatory response.

Background: Prostaglandins are implicated in periodontal bone destruction. We investigated the effect of a non‐selective cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor (indomethacin‐IND) or a type 2 COX inhibitor (meloxicam‐MLX) in an experimental periodontal disease (EPD) model.Methods: Wistar rats were subjected to placement of a nylon thread ligature around the maxillary molars and sacrificed after 7 days. Alveolar bone loss (ABL) was measured in one quadrant as the distance between the cemento‐enamel junction and the alveolar bone. The other quadrant was processed for histopathologic analysis. Daily weight and white blood cell count were recorded. Groups were treated subcutaneously for 7 days with either IND (0.5, 1, or 2 mg/kg) or MLX (0.75, 1.5, or 3 mg/kg). Controls received no treatment. Macroscopic analysis of the gastric mucosa was done. The control group did not receive any manipulation, and a non‐treated group consisted of rats subjected to periodontitis that received no pharmacological treatment.Results: In the non‐treated (NT) group, there was significant ABL, severe mononuclear influx, and an increase in osteoclast numbers. Significant neutrophilia and lymphomonocytosis occurred at 6 hours and at 7 days, respectively, as compared to controls. Significant weight loss persisted until the seventh day in the NT group. Both IND and MLX reduced ABL and histopathologic changes. Neutrophilia and lymphomonocytosis were also significantly reversed. Both IND and MLX induced earlier weight recovery. The stomachs of the IND (1 and 2 mg/kg) groups presented hemorrhage and ulcers, whereas in the MLX‐treated groups, there were mild petechiae just in the 3 mg/kg group.Conclusions: COX inhibition prevented ABL in this experimental periodontal disease model. MLX displays similar efficacy and less gastric damage than IND. MLX may provide a better risk/benefit ratio in the treatment of human periodontitis than non‐selective COX inhibitors. J Periodontol 2000;71:1009‐1014.

Background: Periodontitis is the most frequent cause of tooth loss in adults. Nitric oxide (NO) has been linked to bone resorption mechanisms during inflammation processes. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of NOS (NO synthase) inhibitors in the alveolar bone loss in an experimental periodontitis disease (EPD) model.Methods: Wistar rats were subjected to a ligature placement around the second upper left molars and were sacrificed at 11 days. Alveolar bone loss was evaluated by the sum of distances between the cusp tips and the alveolar bone along the axis of each molar root, subtracting from the contralateral side. Histopathological analysis was based on cell influx, alveolar bone, and cementum integrity. Leukogram was performed at 6 hours and 1, 7, and 11 days after the EPD induction. Groups were treated with the NOS inhibitors, aminoguanidine (AG) (2.5 to 10 mg/kg/d), or L‐arginine methyl ester (L‐NAME, 5 to 20 mg/ kg/d) intraperitoneally (i.p.), 1 hour before the EPD induction and daily for 11 days. Controls received only saline (EPD group). As controls for L‐NAME specificity, groups were co‐treated with either L‐arginine (150 to 600 mg/kg/d) or D‐arginine (600 mg/ kg/d) and L‐NAME (20 mg/kg/d). Different groups were used for morphometric and histopathological analysis.Results: Both L‐NAME and AG significantly and dose‐dependently inhibited the alveolar bone loss as compared to EPD group. L‐NAME (20 mg/kg/d) reduced the alveolar bone loss by 50%, whereas AG (5 mg/kg/d) reduced it by 47% compared to EPD. This result was coupled to a significant reduction of cell influx to the periodontium, as well as to the preservation of alveolar bone and cementum, seen at histopathology, for both compounds. The co‐administration of L‐arginine, but not of D‐arginine reversed L‐NAME effects.Conclusion: These data provide evidence that NOS inhibitors prevent inflammatory bone resorption in experimental periodontitis. J Periodontol 2005;76:956‐963.