Neurolymphomatosis (NL) is a rare manifestation of lymphoma, with limited evidence for optimal management. The largest patient series, 50 cases of lymphoma and leukemia, was published in 2010 with limited rituximab exposure. This study aims to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnostic testing, and outcomes of NL in the rituximab era. Forty biopsy-proven cases of NL, in association with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), at the Mayo Clinic were retrospectively evaluated. B-cell NHL was associated with 97% of NL cases, of which diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most common (68%). Primary NL, defined as neural involvement present at the time of diagnosis of lymphoma, was noted in 52% cases. Seventy percent of patients presented with sensorimotor weakness and neuropathic pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was positive in 100% patients. Overall survival (OS) was significantly better for primary NL and NL associated with indolent lymphomas. Relapses were seen in 60% (24/40) of patients; 75% involved the peripheral or central nervous system at relapse. The use of rituximab in the frontline setting significantly impacted progression-free survival (PFS). Transplant consolidation was noted to be associated with improved OS. This study adds to the available literature on NL in the rituximab era. The overall outcomes have improved in recent years. In our experience, MRI and positron emission tomography/computed tomography may be required for accurate assessment of the extent of disease involvement and identification of an optimal biopsy site. The use of rituximab was associated with improvement in PFS, and autologous stem cell transplant was associated with OS.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel showed efficacy for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL), including primary mediastinal B-cell lymphomas (PMBCL); however, only few PMBCLs were reported. Aim was to evaluate efficacy and safety of axicabtagene ciloleucel in patients with PMBCL compared to those with other LBCL, enrolled in the Italian prospective observational CART-SIE study. PMBCLs (n = 70) were younger, with higher percentage of bulky and refractory disease, compared to other LBCLs (n = 190). Median follow-up time for infused patients was 12.17 months (IQR 5.53,22.73). The overall (complete + partial) response rate (ORR,CR + PR) after bridging was 41% for PMBCL and 28% for other LBCL, p = 0.0102. Thirty days ORR was 78% (53/68) with 50% (34) CR in PMBCL, and 75% (141/187) with 53% (100) CR in other LBCL, p = 0.5457. Ninety days ORR was 69% (45/65) with 65% (42) CR in PMBCL, and 54% (87/162) with 47% (76) CR in other LBCL; progressive disease was 21% in PMBCL and 45% in other LBCL, p = 0.0336. Twelve months progression-free survival was 62% (95% CI: 51–75) in PMBCL versus 48% (95% CI: 41–57) in other LBCL, p = 0.0386. Twelve months overall survival was 86% (95% CI: 78–95) in PMBCL versus 71% (95% CI: 64–79) in other LBCL, p = 0.0034. All grade cytokine release syndrome was 88% (228/260); all grade neurotoxicity was 34% (88/260), with 6% of fatal events in PMBCL. Non-relapse mortality was 3%. In conclusion, PMBCLs achieved significantly better response and survival rates than other LBCLs.

Introduction: High Grade B-cell Lymphomas (HGBL) have been defined as a new separate entity in the 2016 revised WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms. The previously well-known Double- and Triple-Hit Lymphomas (DHL/THL) are included in this umbrella category under the name of HGBL with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (HGBL,R). A comprehensive diagnosis of HGBL is laborious, the diagnostic analyses required are expensive and time-consuming; moreover, a uniform consensus on which patients should be investigated has not been reached yet. Furthermore, there is no agreement on standard therapeutic approach for this entity. Areas covered: In this article the biological and clinical peculiarities of HGBL will be reviewed and all tools for a comprehensive diagnosis as well as the current therapeutic landscape will be investigated. Expert opinion: HGBL,R remains a challenging disease in terms of diagnosis and further research should be performed in order to define clear guidelines determining which cases have to be investigated thoroughly with FISH and other probes. Unsatisfying results have been shown in patients with HGBL,R treated with intensified chemoimmunotherapy strategies therefore larger prospective clinical trials should be conducted. Investigation into novel drugs that could lead an improvement of the current therapeutic approach, should also be addressed.

Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) is a highly curable disease, but around 20% of patients experience progression or relapse after standard frontline chemotherapy regimens. Salvage regimens followed by autologous stem cell transplants represent the historical treatment approach for these cases. In the last decade, with the increasing understanding of cHL biology and tumor microenvironment role in disease course, novel molecules have been introduced in clinical practice, improving outcomes in the relapsed/refractory setting. The anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugated brentuximab vedotin and PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors represent nowadays curative options for chemorefractory patients, and randomized trials recently demonstrated their efficacy in frontline immune-chemo-combined modalities. Several drugs able to modulate the patients’ T-lymphocytes and NK cell activity are under development, as well as many anti-CD30 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell products. Multiple tumor aberrant epigenetic mechanisms are being investigated as targets for antineoplastic compounds such as histone deacetylase inhibitors and hypomethylating agents. Moreover, JAK2 inhibition combined with anti-PD1 blockade revealed a potential complementary therapeutic pathway in cHL. In this review, we will summarize recent findings on cHL biology and novel treatment options clinically available, as well as promising future perspectives in the field.

Anti-CD19 CAR T-cells have revolutionized outcomes in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas. Long-term follow-up underscored the role of hematological toxicity in non-relapse mortality, largely driven by infections, leading to the development of the CAR-HEMATOTOX (HT) score for predicting neutropenia. The European scientific community (EHA/EBMT) later reached a consensus, defining a new entity: immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT). To validate the ability of the HT score to predict ICAHT and survival. The CART-SIE is an ongoing multicenter prospective observational study collecting data on patients affected by B-cell lymphoma treated with commercial anti-CD19 CAR T-cells (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06339255). Since 2019 to 2024, 1002 consecutive patients were enrolled. Out of 746 patients infused, the HT score at infusion was evaluable in 389. Median age was 59 years (48-66). Patients with high HT score had greater disease burden and a greater need for bridge therapy. Patients with a HT^HIGH score had a 4-fold higher risk of experiencing late ICAHT of grade≥3 (OR=3.99, _95%CI=1.16-13.77, p=0.03). Patients with a HT^HIGH score also showed lower overall response rates (ORR) and complete response rates (CRR) at 90 days (CRR at 90 days: 59% HT^LOW vs 38% HT^HIGH, OR=0.42, _95%CI=0.27-0.66, p=0.0002; ORR at 90 days: 67% HT^LOW vs 49% HT^HIGH, OR=0.47, _95%CI=0.29-0.74, p=0.001). Adjusted logistic models confirmed that the effect of HT score was independent from baseline characteristics. With a median follow-up of 18 months, patients with a HT^HIGH score have lower OS and PFS (1-year OS: 78% HT^LOW versus 62% HT^HIGH, p=0.0002; 1-year PFS: 49% versus 39%, p=0.003). Adjusted Cox models confirmed that HT was an independent prognostic factor for OS. A high HT-score was found to be associated with higher risk of secondary primary malignancy (HR=2.8, _95%CI=1.03-7.8, p=0.04). A simplified version of HT (simpleHT), based solely on the platelet count and C-reactive protein at infusion, was calculated for 560 patients and proved significant in predicting both OS and PFS (1-year was 72% simpleHT^LOW vs 37% simpleHT^HIGH, p<0.0001, 1-year PFS was 48% simpleHT^LOW vs 22% simpleHT^HIGH, p<0.0001). In our prospective real-world study, we validated the ability of the HT score to predict ICAHT and survival. SimpleHT identified a population at very high risk with an impaired progression free and overall survival.