Soumya M. Turaga

Dr. Soumya M. Turaga

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 May 2016 in Stem Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BOBalint Otvos
Balint Otvos
DSDaniel J. Silver
Daniel J. Silver
EMErin Mulkearns-Hubert
Erin Mulkearns-Hubert
AAAlvaro G. Alvarado
Alvaro G. Alvarado
STSoumya M. Turaga
Soumya M. Turaga
JLJustin Lathia
Justin Lathia
Shifting the balance away from tumor‐mediated immune suppression toward tumor immune rejection is the conceptual foundation for a variety of immunotherapy efforts currently being tested. These efforts largely focus on activating antitumor immune responses but are confounded by multiple immune cell populations, including myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which serve to suppress immune system function. We have identified immune‐suppressive MDSCs in the brains of GBM patients and found that they were in close proximity to self‐renewing cancer stem cells (CSCs). MDSCs were selectively depleted using 5‐flurouracil (5‐FU) in a low‐dose administration paradigm, which resulted in prolonged survival in a syngeneic mouse model of glioma. In coculture studies, patient‐derived CSCs but not nonstem tumor cells selectively drove MDSC‐mediated immune suppression. A cytokine screen revealed that CSCs secreted multiple factors that promoted this activity, including macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), which was produced at high levels by CSCs. Addition of MIF increased production of the immune‐suppressive enzyme arginase‐1 in MDSCs in a CXCR2‐dependent manner, whereas blocking MIF reduced arginase‐1 production. Similarly to 5‐FU, targeting tumor‐derived MIF conferred a survival advantage to tumor‐bearing animals and increased the cytotoxic T cell response within the tumor. Importantly, tumor cell proliferation, survival, and self‐renewal were not impacted by MIF reduction, demonstrating that MIF is primarily an indirect promoter of GBM progression, working to suppress immune rejection by activating and protecting immune suppressive MDSCs within the GBM tumor microenvironment. Stem Cells 2016;34:2026–2039

1 April 2017 in Cell Stem Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAlvaro G. Alvarado
Alvaro G. Alvarado
PTPraveena S. Thiagarajan
Praveena S. Thiagarajan
EMErin Mulkearns-Hubert
Erin Mulkearns-Hubert
DSDaniel J. Silver
Daniel J. Silver
JHJames S. Hale
James S. Hale
JLJustin Lathia
Justin Lathia

8 February 2018 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PTPraveena S. Thiagarajan
Praveena S. Thiagarajan
MSMaksim Sinyuk
Maksim Sinyuk
STSoumya M. Turaga
Soumya M. Turaga
EMErin Mulkearns-Hubert
Erin Mulkearns-Hubert
JHJames S. Hale
James S. Hale
JLJustin Lathia
Justin Lathia
Tumors adapt their phenotypes during growth and in response to therapies through dynamic changes in cellular processes. Connexin proteins enable such dynamic changes during development, and their dysregulation leads to disease states. The gap junction communication channels formed by connexins have been reported to exhibit tumor-suppressive functions, including in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, we find that connexin 26 (Cx26) is elevated in self-renewing cancer stem cells (CSCs) and is necessary and sufficient for their maintenance. Cx26 promotes CSC self-renewal by forming a signaling complex with the pluripotency transcription factor NANOG and focal adhesion kinase (FAK), resulting in NANOG stabilization and FAK activation. This FAK/NANOG-containing complex is not formed in mammary epithelial or luminal breast cancer cells. These findings challenge the paradigm that connexins are tumor suppressors in TNBC and reveal a unique function for Cx26 in regulating the core self-renewal signaling that controls CSC maintenance.

15 September 2015 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAlvaro G. Alvarado
Alvaro G. Alvarado
STSoumya M. Turaga
Soumya M. Turaga
PSPratheesh Sathyan
Pratheesh Sathyan
EMErin Mulkearns-Hubert
Erin Mulkearns-Hubert
BOBalint Otvos
Balint Otvos
JLJustin Lathia
Justin Lathia
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) provide an additional layer of complexity for tumor models and targets for therapeutic development. The balance between CSC self-renewal and differentiation is driven by niche components including adhesion, which is a hallmark of stemness. While studies have demonstrated that the reduction of adhesion molecules, such as integrins and junctional adhesion molecule-A (JAM-A), decreases CSC maintenance. The molecular circuitry underlying these interactions has yet to be resolved. MicroRNA screening predicted that microRNA-145 (miR-145) would bind to JAM-A. JAM-A overexpression in CSCs was evaluated both in vitro (proliferation and self-renewal) and in vivo (intracranial tumor initiation). miR-145 introduction into CSCs was similarly assessed in vitro. Additionally, The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset was evaluated for expression levels of miR-145 and overall survival of the different molecular groups. Using patient-derived glioblastoma CSCs, we confirmed that JAM-A is suppressed by miR-145. CSCs expressed low levels of miR-145, and its introduction decreased self-renewal through reductions in AKT signaling and stem cell marker (SOX2, OCT4, and NANOG) expression; JAM-A overexpression rescued these effects. These findings were predictive of patient survival, with a JAM-A/miR-145 signature robustly predicting poor patient prognosis. Our results link CSC-specific niche signaling to a microRNA regulatory network that is altered in glioblastoma and can be targeted to attenuate CSC self-renewal.

1 October 2017 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NDNurmaa K. Dashzeveg
Nurmaa K. Dashzeveg
RTRokana Taftaf
Rokana Taftaf
ERErika K. Ramos
Erika K. Ramos
LTLuke Torre-Healy
Luke Torre-Healy
ACAnastasia Chumakova
Anastasia Chumakova
HLHuiping Liu
Huiping Liu
The second International Cancer Stem Cell Conference in Cleveland, Ohio, on September 20–23, 2016, convened 330 attendees from academic, industrial, and clinical organizations. It featured a debate on the concepts and challenges of the cancer stem cells (CSC) as well as CSC-centered scientific sessions on clinical trials, genetics and epigenetics, tumor microenvironment, immune suppression, metastasis, therapeutic resistance, and emerging novel concepts. The conference hosted 35 renowned speakers, 100 posters, 20 short talks, and a preconference workshop. The reported advances of CSC research and therapies fostered new collaborations across national and international borders, and inspired the next generation's young scientists. Cancer Res; 77(19); 5222–7. ©2017 AACR.

12 September 2016 in CNS Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STSoumya M. Turaga
Soumya M. Turaga
JLJustin Lathia
Justin Lathia
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive malignant primary brain tumor in adults with a high recurrence and mortality rate. GBM tumors contain a high degree of cellular heterogeneity, with cells e...