Cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) are usually positive charged peptides and have good cell membrane permeability. Meanwhile, CPPs are facile to synthesize, and can be functionalized to satisfy different demands, such as cyclization, incorporating unnatural amino acids, and lipid conjugation. These properties have made them as efficient drug-delivery tools to deliver therapeutic molecules to cells and tissues in a nontoxic manner, including small molecules, DNA, siRNA, therapeutic proteins and other various nanoparticles. However, the poor serum stability and low tumor targeting ability also hindered their broad application. Besides, inappropriate chemical modification can lead to membrane disruption and nonspecific toxicity. In this paper, we first reviewed recent advances in the CPP applications for cancer therapy via covalent or non-covalent manners. We carefully analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of each CPP modifications for drug delivery. Then, we concluded the recent progress of their clinical trials for different diseases. Finally, we discussed the challenges and opportunities CPPs met to translate into clinical applications. This review presented a new insight into CPPs for drug delivery, which could provide advice on the design of clinically effective systemic delivery systems using CPPs.
The emergence of effective immunotherapies has revolutionized therapies for many types of cancer. However, current immunotherapy has limited efficacy in certain patient populations and displays therapeutic resistance after a period of treatment. To address these challenges, a growing number of immunotherapy drugs have been investigated in clinical and preclinical applications. The diverse functionality of peptides has made them attractive as a therapeutic modality, and the global market for peptide-based therapeutics is witnessing significant growth. Peptides can act as immunotherapeutic agents for the treatment of many malignant cancers. However, a systematic understanding of the interactions between different peptides and the host’s immune system remains unclear. This review describes in detail the roles of peptides in regulating the function of the immune system for cancer immunotherapy. Initially, we systematically elaborate on the relevant mechanisms of cancer immunotherapy. Subsequently, we categorize peptide-based nanomaterials into the following three categories: peptide-based vaccines, anti-cancer peptides, and peptide-based delivery systems. We carefully analyzed the roles of these peptides in overcoming the current barriers in immunotherapy, including multiple strategies to enhance the immunogenicity of peptide vaccines, the synergistic effect of anti-cancer peptides in combination with other immune agents, and peptide assemblies functioning as immune stimulators or vehicles to deliver immune agents. Furthermore, we introduce the current status of peptide-based immunotherapy in clinical applications and discuss the weaknesses and future prospects of peptide-based materials for cancer immunotherapy. Overall, this review aims to enhance comprehension of the potential applications of peptide-based materials in cancer immunotherapy and lay the groundwork for future research and clinical applications.
Immunotherapy has revolutionized the field of cancer therapy. Nanomaterials can further improve the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy because of their tunability and multifunctionality. Owing to their natural biocompatibility, diverse designs, and dynamic self-assembly, peptide-based nanomaterials hold great potential as immunotherapeutic agents for many malignant cancers, with good immune response and safety. Over the past several decades, peptides have been developed as tumor antigens, effective antigen delivery carriers, and self-assembling adjuvants for cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we give a brief introduction to the use of peptide-based nanomaterials for cancer immunotherapy as antigens, carriers, and adjuvants, and to their current clinical applications. Overall, this review can facilitate further understanding of peptide-based nanomaterials for cancer immunotherapy and may pave the way for designing safe and efficient methods for future vaccines or immunotherapies.
This study aimed to design a VEGFR-targeting peptide–drug conjugate with the ability to decrease tumor burden and suppress tumor angiogenesis, and to further evaluate the therapeutic effect of anti-PD-1 antibody in HCC therapy. A VEGFR-targeting peptide VEGF125 − 136 (QR) was conjugated with a lytic peptide (KLU) to form a peptide–drug conjugate QR-KLU. And the efficacy of QR-KLU in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody for HCC therapy in vivo and in vitro were evaluated. QR-KLU inhibited the proliferation and migration of mouse HCC cell line (Hepa1–6) cells under normoxic and hypoxic conditions in a dose-dependent manner. In the subcutaneous Hepa1–6 tumor model, QR-KLU combined with the anti-PD-1 antibody substantially inhibited tumor growth, promoted tumor necrosis, and prolonged the survival time of tumor-bearing mice. QR-KLU substantially inhibited hypoxia-induced expression of VEGF, promoted tumor vascular normalization, and increased cluster of differentiation 8+ (CD8+) T cell infiltration in the tumor. In addition, QR-KLU and anti-PD-1 antibody demonstrated a strong synergistic effect in promoting the activation of intratumoral CD8+ T cells, reducing the expression of immune-inhibitory factors, and increasing the expression of immune-stimulatory factors. This study proposed a novel approach for enhancing the efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody using a VEGFR-targeting peptide–drug conjugate in HCC therapy.
15 February 2023 in Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry
The anti-cancer peptides emerged as new weapons for cancer therapy due to their potent toxicity toward various cancer cells. However, their therapeutic promise is often limited by non-specific toxicity to normal cells. How to improve peptides' selectivity to cancer cells is always a matter to solve. In this manuscript, we designed a sulfonium tethered lytic peptide conjugated with a HDAC inhibitor to improve the selectivity of cancer cells. The sulfonium tethered lytic peptide with improved hydrophilicity and positive charge showed reduced toxicity to both cancer cells and normal cells. When conjugated with the HDAC inhibitor, this peptide showed increased toxicity to cancer cells. Besides, the stabilized peptide HDAC conjugate showed better serum stability than the linear peptide conjugate. For cellular function, the stabilized peptide conjugate could induce cancer cell apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and influence multiple signal pathways through transcriptome analysis. This design may provide an alternative approach for the development of safe and effective anti-cancer drugs.