Background: This study aimed to find out the change in the rate and pattern of suicide attempts during severe acute respiratory syndrome COVID-19 pandemic period. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of data collected as a part of an emergency room-based post-suicide management program. The data were collected through interviews and from medical records of suicide attempts, maintained in the emergency room, from January 19 to October 31, 2020, during the “COVID-19 period,” and those who attempted suicide from January 19 to October 31, 2019 “pre-COVID-19 period.” We extracted educational background, marital status, occupation, presence of domestic partner, history of mental illness, alcohol consumption, history of previous suicide attempts; suicide attempt method and location (i.e., at home or a place other than home) at the time of attempt, and whether the attempt was a mass suicide. In addition, we compared patient severity between “COVID-19 period” and “pre-COVID-19 period” using the initial KTAS (South Korean triage and acuity scale) level, consciousness level, and systolic blood pressure. In 2012, KTAS was developed through the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s research project to establish triage system in South Korea. Results: The analysis of the number of suicide attempts during “pre-COVID-19 period” and “ COVID-19 period” showed that the number of suicide attempts during “COVID-19 period” (n = 440) increased compared to the “pre-COVID-19 period” (n = 400). Moreover, the method of suicide attempts during “COVID-19 period” included overdose of drugs such as hypnotics, antipsychotics, and pesticides that were already possessed by the patient increased compared to the “pre-COVID-19 period” (P < 0.05). At the time of the visit to the emergency room, high KTAS level, low level of consciousness, and low systolic blood pressure, were observed, which were significantly different between “COVID-19 period” and “pre-COVID-19 period” (P < 0.05). Conclusion: With the worldwide COVID-19 virus spread, suicide rate and suicide attempts at home have significantly increased. In addition, patient severity was higher in the “COVID-19 period” than that in the “pre-COVID-19 period.” The increasing suicide attempt rate should be controlled by cooperation between the emergency room and regional organizations.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of real-time audio ventilation feedback on the survival of patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) during advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) performed by paramedics. This research was a prospective randomized controlled study performed in Busan, South Korea, from July 2022 to December 2022. This study included 121 patients, ages 19 and up, who were transferred to the study site, excluding 91 patients who did not receive CPR under a doctor’s direction as well as those who had a ’(DNR)’ order among 212 adult CA patients. OHCA patients’ clinical prognosis was compared by being randomly assigned to either a general manual defibrillator (NVF) group (N = 58) or a manual defibrillator with an audio ventilation feedback (AVF) group (N = 63). To verify the primary outcome, the cerebral performance category (CPC), return of spontaneous consciousness (ROSC), 30h survival, and survival discharge were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to analyze the association between the audio-feedback manual defibrillator (AVF) and the ROSC of OHCA patients. This study analyzed 121 patients among 212 OHCA patients. The ROSC (AVF group: 32 {26.4%} vs. NVF group: 21 {17.3%}), 24 h survival (AVF group: 24 {19.8%} vs. NVF group: 11 {9.0%}), and survival discharge (AVF group: 12 {9.9%} vs. NVF group: 6 {4.9%}) were higher in the AVF group than the NVF group. However, upon analyzing CPC scores in the surviving patients between the two groups, there was no significant difference (AVF group: 4.1 ± 1.23 vs. NVF group:4.7 ± 1.23, p = 1.232). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the use of AVF was associated with a higher ROSC (odds ratio {OR}, 0.46; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.23–0.73; p < 0.01) and higher survival at 30 h (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41–0.98; p = 0.01).

Background: This study aims to verify whether the blood flow velocity and the diameter size, measured through intra-carotid artery Doppler measurements performed on sepsis patients visiting the emergency department, are useful as tools for predicting the risk of early death. Methods: As a prospective study, this research was performed on sepsis patients who visited a local emergency medical center from August 2021 to February 2023. The sepsis patients’ carotid artery was measured using Doppler imaging, and they were divided into patients measured for the size of systolic and diastolic mean blood flow velocity and diameter size: those measured for their qSOFA (quick sequential organ failure assessment) score and those measured using the SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome) criteria. By measuring and comparing their mortality prediction accuracies, this study sought to verify the usefulness of blood flow velocity and the diameter size of the intra-carotid artery as tools to predict early death. Results: This study was conducted on 1026 patients, excluding 45 patients out of the total of 1071 patients. All sepsis patients were measured using systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity and diameter by Doppler imaging of the intra-carotid artery, assessed using qSOFA and evaluated using SIRS criteria. The results of the analysis performed to compare the mortality prediction accuracy were as follows. First, the hazard ratio (95% CI) of the intra-carotid artery was significant (p < 0.05), at 1.020 (1.004–1.036); the hazard ratio (95% CI) of qSOFA was significant (p < 0.05), at 3.871 (2.526–5.931); and the hazard ratio (95% CI) of SIRS showed no significant difference, at 1.002 (0.995–1.009). After 2 h of infusion treatment, the diameter size was 4.72 ± 1.23, showing a significant difference (p < 0.05). After 2 h of fluid treatment, the blood flow velocity was 101 m/s ± 21.12, which showed a significant difference (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Measuring the mean blood flow velocity in the intra-carotid arteries of sepsis patients who visit the emergency department is useful for predicting the risk of death at an early stage. And this study showed that Doppler measurement of the diameter size of the carotid artery significantly increased after performing fluid treatment after early recognition.

Background The purpose of this study was to conduct the effect of real-time audio ventilation feedback on the survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest(OHCA) patients during advanced cardiac life support(ACLS) performed by paramedics.Methods This study was a prospective randomized controlled study in Busan, South Korea from July 2022 to December 2022.The patients of this study were 121 aged 19 years or older who were transferred to the study institution excluding 91 patients who withholding CPR under doctor's direction and 'Do not resuscitation (DNR) state among 212 adult CA patients. OHCA patients were randomly assigned to compare clinical prognosis using a randomized a general manual defibrillator (NVF) group (N = 58) and a manual defibrillator with audio ventilation feedback (AVF) group (N = 63). To verify the primary outcome, the cerebral performance category (CPC), return of spontaneous consciousness(ROSC), 30 hours survival, and survival discharge were compared. And multivariate logistic regression was conducted to analyze the association of us between the audio-feedback manual defibrillator (AVF) and the ROSC of OCHA patients.Results This study analyzed 121 patients among 212 OCHA patients. The ROSC (AVF group: 32{26.4%} vs. NVF group: 21 {17.3%}), 24-hour survival (AVF group: 24 {19.8%} vs. NVF group: 11 {9.0%}), and survival discharge (AVF group: 12 {9.9%} vs. NVF group: 6 {4.9%}) were higher AVF group than NVF group. But, analyzed CPC scores in surviving patients between the two groups, there was no significant difference (AVF group:4.1 ± 1.23 vs. NVF group: 4.7 ± 1.23, p = 1.232). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the use of AVF was associated with a higher ROSC (odds ratio {OR}, 0.46; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.23–0.73; P < 0.01) and higher survival at 30 hours (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41–0.98; p = 0.01).Conclusion The use of the audio ventilation feedback has been associated with a higher ROSC and higher survival at 30 hours after CA.