With less than two decades of activity, research on melt inclusions (MI) in crystals from rocks that have undergone\ud crustal anatexis – migmatites and granulites – is a recent addition to crustal petrology and geochemistry.\ud Studies on this subject started with glassy inclusions in anatectic crustal enclaves in lavas, and then progressed\ud to regionally metamorphosed and partially melted crustal rocks, where melt inclusions are normally crystallized\ud into a cryptocrystalline aggregate (nanogranitoid).\ud Since the first paper on melt inclusions in the granulites of the Kerala Khondalite Belt in 2009, reported and\ud studied occurrences are already a few tens. Melt inclusions in migmatites and granulites show many\ud analogieswith theirmore common and long studied counterparts in igneous rocks, but also display very important\ud differences and peculiarities,which are the subject of this review. Microstructurally, melt inclusions\ud in anatectic rocks are small, commonly 10 μm in diameter, and their main mineral host is peritectic garnet,\ud although several other hosts have been observed. Inclusion contents vary from glass in enclaves\ud that were cooled very rapidly from supersolidus temperatures, to completely crystallized material in\ud slowly cooled regional migmatites. The chemical composition of the inclusions can be analyzed combining\ud several techniques (SEM, EMP, NanoSIMS, LA–ICP–MS), but in the case of crystallized inclusions the\ud experimental remelting under confining pressure in a piston cylinder is a prerequisite. The melt is\ud generally granitic and peraluminous, although granodioritic to trondhjemitic compositions have also\ud been found.\ud Being mostly primary in origin, inclusions attest for the growth of their peritectic host in the presence of\ud melt. As a consequence, the inclusions have the unique ability of preserving information on the composition\ud of primary anatectic crustal melts, before they undergo any of the common following changes in their way\ud to produce crustal magmas. For these peculiar features, melt inclusions in migmatites and granulites, largely\ud overlooked so far, have the potential to become a fundamental tool for the study of crustal melting,\ud crustal differentiation, and even the generation of the continental crust

Using a metatexite from the Spanish Betic Cordillera as an example, we show that in situ and otherwise impossible to retrieve compositional information on natural anatectic melts can be reliably gained from experimentally rehomogenized melt inclusions in peritectic garnets. Experiments were conducted on single garnet crystals in a piston cylinder apparatus until the complete homogenization of crystal-bearing melt inclusions at the conditions inferred for the anatexis. The compositions of quenched glasses, representative of the early anatectic melts, are leucogranitic and peraluminous, and differ from those of leucosomes in the host rock. The H2O contents in the glasses suggest that melts formed at low temperature (~700 °C) may not be as hydrous and mobile as thought. Providing for the fi rst time the precise melt composition (including the volatile components) in the specifi c anatectic rock under study, our approach improves our understanding of crustal melting and generation of S-type granites

This review presents a compositional database of primary anatectic granitoid magmas, entirely based on melt inclusions (MI) in high-grade metamorphic rocks. Although MI are well known to igneous petrologists and have been extensively studied in intrusive and extrusive rocks, MI in crustal rocks that have undergone anatexis (migmatites and granulites) are a novel subject of research. They are generally trapped along the heating path by peritectic phases produced by incongruent melting reactions. Primary MI in high-grade metamorphic rocks are small, commonly 5–10 μm in diameter, and their most common mineral host is peritectic garnet. In most cases inclusions have crystallized into a cryptocrystalline aggregate and contain a granitoid phase assemblage (nanogranitoid inclusions) with quartz, K-feldspar, plagioclase, and one or two mica depending on the particular circumstances. After their experimental remelting under high-confining pressure, nanogranitoid MI can be analyzed combining several techniques (EMP, LA-ICP-MS, NanoSIMS, Raman). The trapped melt is granitic and metaluminous to peraluminous, and sometimes granodioritic, tonalitic, and trondhjemitic in composition, in agreement with the different $P-T-aH2O$ conditions of melting and protolith composition, and overlap the composition of experimental glasses produced at similar conditions. Being trapped along the up-temperature trajectory—as opposed to classic MI in igneous rocks formed during down-temperature magma crystallization—fundamental information provided by nanogranitoid MI is the pristine composition of the natural primary anatectic melt for the specific rock under investigation. So far ~600 nanogranitoid MI, coming from several occurrences from different geologic and geodynamic settings and ages, have been characterized. Although the compiled MI database should be expanded to other potential sources of crustal magmas, MI data collected so far can be already used as natural “starting-point” compositions to track the processes involved in formation and evolution of granitoid magmas.

Large Igneous Province eruptions coincide with many major Phanerozoic mass extinctions, suggesting a cause-effect relationship where volcanic degassing triggers global climatic changes. In order to fully understand this relationship, it is necessary to constrain the quantity and type of degassed magmatic volatiles, and to determine the depth of their source and the timing of eruption. Here we present direct evidence of abundant CO₂in basaltic rocks from the end-Triassic Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP), through investigation of gas exsolution bubbles preserved by melt inclusions. Our results indicate abundance of CO₂and a mantle and/or lower-middle crustal origin for at least part of the degassed carbon. The presence of deep carbon is a key control on the emplacement mode of CAMP magmas, favouring rapid eruption pulses (a few centuries each). Our estimates suggest that the amount of CO₂that each CAMP magmatic pulse injected into the end-Triassic atmosphere is comparable to the amount of anthropogenic emissions projected for the 21^stcentury. Such large volumes of volcanic CO₂likely contributed to end-Triassic global warming and ocean acidification.

Suprasolidus continental crust is prone to loss and redistribution of anatectic melt to shallow crustal levels. These processes ultimately lead to differentiation of the continental crust. The majority of granulite facies rocks worldwide has experienced melt loss and the reintegration of melt is becoming an increasingly popular approach to reconstruct the prograde history of melt‐depleted rocks by means of phase equilibria modelling. It involves the stepwise down‐temperature reintegration of a certain amount of melt into the residual bulk composition along an inferredP–Tpath, and various ways of calculating and reintegrating melt compositions have been developed and applied. Here different melt‐reintegration approaches are tested using El Hoyazo granulitic enclaves (SE Spain), and Mt. Stafford residual migmatites (central Australia). Various sets ofP–Tpseudosections were constructed progressing step by step, to lower temperatures along the inferredP–Tpaths. Melt‐reintegration was done following one‐step and multi‐step procedures proposed in the literature. For El Hoyazo granulites, modelling was also performed reintegrating the measured melt inclusions and matrix glass compositions and considering the melt amounts inferred by mass–balance calculations. The overall topology of phase diagrams is pretty similar, suggesting that, in spite of the different methods adopted, reintegrating a certain amount of melt can be sufficient to reconstruct a plausible prograde history (i.e. melting conditions and reactions, and melt productivity) of residual migmatites and granulites. However, significant underestimations of melt productivity may occur and have to be taken into account when a melt‐reintegration approach is applied to highly residual (SiO₂<55 wt%) rocks, or to rocks for which H₂O retention from subsolidus conditions is high (such as in the case of rapid crustal melting triggered by mafic magma underplating).