The inflammatory Bowel diseases (IBDs) are a chronic, relapsing inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract with heterogeneous behavior and prognosis. The introduction of biological therapies including anti-TNF, anti-IL-12/23, and anti-integrins, has revolutionized the treatment of IBD, but these drugs are not universally effective. Due to the complex molecular structures of biologics, they are uniformly immunogenic. New discoveries concerning the underlying mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of IBD have allowed for progress in the development of new treatment options. The advantage of small molecules (SMs) over biological therapies includes their lack of immunogenicity, short half-life, oral administration, and low manufacturing cost. Among these, the Janus Kinases (JAKs) inhibition has emerged as a novel strategy to modulate downstream cytokine signaling during immune-mediated diseases. These drugs target various cytokine signaling pathways that participate in the pathogenesis of IBD. Tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor targeting predominantly JAK1 and JAK3, has been approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), and there are other specific JAK inhibitors under development that may be effective in Crohn’s. Similarly, the traffic of lymphocytes can now be targeted by another SM. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) agonism is a novel strategy that acts, in part, by interfering with lymphocyte recirculation, through blockade of lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes. S1PR agonists are being studied in IBD and other immune-mediated disorders. This review will focus on SM drugs approved and under development, including JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib, peficitinib) and S1PR agonists (KRP-203, fingolimod, ozanimod, etrasimod, amiselimod), and their mechanism of action.

Background. Psoriasis induced by anti–tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) therapy has been described as a paradoxical side effect.Aim. To determine the incidence, c

After 20 years of successful targeting of pro-inflammatory cytokines for the treatment of IBD, an alternative therapeutic strategy has emerged, based on several decades of advances in understanding the pathogenesis of IBD. The targeting of molecules involved in leukocyte traffic has recently become a safe and effective alternative. With 2 currently approved drugs (ie, natalizumab, vedolizumab) and several others in phase 3 trials (eg, etrolizumab, ozanimod, anti-MAdCAM-1), the blockade of trafficking molecules has firmly emerged as a new therapeutic era for IBD. We discuss the targets that have been explored in clinical trials: chemokines and its receptors (eg, IP10, CCR9), integrins (eg, natalizumab, AJM300, vedolizumab, and etrolizumab), and its endothelial ligands (MAdCAM-1, ICAM-1). We also discuss a distinct strategy that interferes with lymphocyte recirculation by blocking lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes (small molecule sphingosine-phosphate receptor [S1PR] agonists: fingolimod, ozanimod, etrasimod, amiselimod). Strategies on the horizon include additional small molecules, allosteric inhibitors that specifically bind to the active integrin form and nanovectors that allow for the use of RNA interference in the quest to modulate pro-inflammatory leukocyte trafficking in IBD.

The ST2/IL-33 pathway has been related to ulcerative colitis (UC), and soluble ST2 (sST2), to disease severity. We tested the potential usefulness of sST2 as a predictive marker of treatment response and patients’ outcome. Twenty-six patients with active UC were prospectively recruited and grouped according to an endoscopic score and therapy response. Colonoscopic biopsies were collected at baseline and 6 months or when patients showed clinical activity. The protocol was reinitiated in patients requiring rescue therapy. Blood and stool were collected at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Serum and mucosal ST2, and fecal calprotectin (FC) content were determined by ELISA and correlated to Mayo clinical and endoscopic subscore. Intestinal ST2 was evaluated by immunofluorescence. Wilcoxon signed rank test and Spearman correlations (Rs) were applied (p <0.05). Follow-up was completed in 24 patients. sST2 levels (median and range) varied from 173.5 [136.6–274.0] to 86.5 [54.6–133.2] in responders (p < 0.05), and 336.3 [211.0–403.2] to 385.3 pg/mL [283.4–517.3] in non-responders at baseline and 6 months, respectively. sST2 levels correlated with Mayo clinical and endoscopic subscore, mucosal ST2 and FC (Rs = 0.57, 0.66, 0.74 and 0.42, respectively; p < 0.0001) and showed a trend similar to that of FC in responders. Non-responders revealed an increased ST2 content, restricted to the lamina propria’s cellular infiltrate. Consecutive sST2 measurement to follow changes in inflammatory activity of UC patients who respond or not to treatment identifies sST2, like FC, as a useful biomarker in predicting clinical outcome of UC patients.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor agonists are a promising therapeutic alternative to anti-integrin antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease. Here, we report that modulation of tissue S1P levels via inhibition of the S1P lyase might be an effective alternative, acting by interference with thymocyte maturation.