Précis: Monitoring visual fields (VFs) through virtual reality devices proved to have good inter-test and test-retest reliability, as well as easy usability, when self-administered by individuals with and without VF defects in a remote setting. Purpose: To assess the reliability of remote, self-administered VF monitoring using a virtual reality VF (VRVF) device in individuals without ocular disease and with stable VF defects. Materials and Methods: Individuals without ocular disease and with stable defects were recruited. All participants had a baseline standard automated perimetry (SAP) test. Participants tested remotely on a VRVF device for 4 weeks (examinations V₁, V₂, V₃, and V₄), with the last 3 unassisted. The mean sensitivities of VRVF results were compared with each other and to SAP results for reliability. Results: A total of 42 eyes from 21 participants were tested on the VRVF device. Participants tested consistently although external factors impacted outcomes. VRVF results were in reasonable agreement with the baseline SAP. Examinations performed by the cohort with stable defects evinced better agreement with SAP examinations (V2, P = 0.79; V3, P = 0.39; V4, P = 0.35) than those reported by the cohort without ocular disease (V2, P = 0.02; V3, P = 0.15; V4, P = 0.22), where the null hypothesis is that the instruments agree. Fixation losses were high and variable in VRVF examinations compared with those of SAP, particularly in certain test takers. Participants considered the device comfortable and easy to use. Conclusions: Self-administered, remote VF tests on a VRVF device showed satisfactory test-retest reliability, good inter-test agreement with SAP, and acceptability by its users. External factors may impact at-home testing and age and visual impairment may hinder fixation. Future studies to expand the sample size and understand inconsistencies in fixation losses are recommended.

To test the use of a virtual reality visual field headset (VRVF) for implementation of the Esterman visual field (EVF) test as compared with standard automated perimetry (SAP) among people with glaucoma. Experimental design. Patients with mild to severe glaucoma ranging from 10 to 90 years who presented for follow-up at a glaucoma clinic in Miami, Florida were eligible. Participants performed the EVF test on both SAP and VRVF. Five glaucoma-trained ophthalmologists were then asked to rate all anonymized SAP and RVF tests as a “pass” or “failure” based on Florida state law. Point-by-point concordance between original VRVF EVF test results and SAP EVF test results was calculated using the Kappa statistic. Concordance between SAP and VRVF was secondarily assessed with a conditional logistic regression based on the pass-failure determinations by the glaucoma-trained ophthalmologists. Interrater agreement on test pass-failure determinations was also calculated. Finally, test results on SAP versus VRVF were compared based on Esterman efficiency score (EES), the number of correct points divided by the number of total points, and duration of testing. Twenty-two subjects were included in the study with ages ranging from 14 to 78 years old. Concordance between VRVF and SAP test using point-by-point analysis was poor (κ = 0.332, [95% confidence intervals {CI}: 0.157, 0.506]) and somewhat increased using pass-failure determinations from ophthalmologists (κ = 0.657, [95% CI: 0.549, 0.751]). Ophthalmologists were more likely to agree amongst themselves on pass-failure determinations for VRVF tests (κ = 0.890, [95% CI: 0.726, 0.964]) than for SAP (κ = 0.590, [95% CI: 0.372, 0.818]); however, VRVF demonstrated significantly lower EES than SAP (median EES difference: 4.5 points, P = 0.021). This pilot study is the first to assess the implementation of the EVF test using a virtual reality headset. Based on the weak overall agreement between VRVF and SAP, the current VRVF EVF test is not an acceptable determinant of driver’s licensing. However, ophthalmologists were more likely to agree amongst themselves on VRVF test reports than on SAP reports. With further testing and improvement, virtual reality may eventually become a portable and convenient method for administering the EVF test. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Précis: Glaucoma cascade screening in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of young Haitian glaucoma patients had high yield for diagnosing manifest and suspected glaucoma in 30.8% of those screened despite modest participation. Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of glaucoma cascade screening in FDRs (parents, siblings, and offspring) of Haitian juvenile open-angle glaucoma (JOAG) patients. Patients and Methods: Consecutive index patients (Haitians with JOAG) were identified, and the number/type of FDRs residing in South Florida were recorded. These FDRs were invited for free glaucoma screening, which included a comprehensive ophthalmic exam, gonioscopy, automated visual field testing and optical coherence tomographic analysis of the retinal nerve fiber layers. FDR characteristics and clinical findings from screening are reported. Results: A total of 77 FDRs were invited, 26 (33.8%) agreed to undergo screening (18 females, 9 males), which revealed 2 (7.7%) with manifest glaucoma (mean age 77.5 y; one of whom was previously unaware of his glaucoma diagnosis), 6 (23.1%) with suspected glaucoma (mean age 29.8±18.3 y), and 18 (69.2%) without manifest or suspected glaucoma (mean age 37.2±21.8 y). Siblings of index patients were least likely to participate in cascade glaucoma screening when compared with index patients’ parents or offspring. FDR eyes with manifest glaucoma had significantly worse best-corrected visual acuities, higher intraocular pressures, thinner central corneal thicknesses, and thinner circumferential papillary retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses than those without glaucoma. Conclusion: Glaucoma cascade screening of Haitian JOAG patients’ FDRs revealed that 30.8% had suspected or manifest glaucoma. Future efforts centered on provider-initiated recruitment and improving public glaucoma awareness and education may increase screening participation.

Visual impairment (VI) negatively affects a child’s quality of life. The prevalence of VI in the Caribbean is nearly three times higher than in the United States, but the causes remain uncertain. This study leverages Barbados’ unique eye care system to survey the eye diseases and VI prevalence in Barbadian children. Medical records of all patients aged <19 years who received ophthalmic care in Barbados’ two public eye care centers between January and December 2019 were reviewed, capturing the entirety of public pediatric eye care within the study period. Age at the first visit to the clinic and at the final visit in 2019, sex, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), past medical history, and clinical diagnoses were extracted and analyzed. VI was defined as a BCVA of 6/12 or worse in the better-seeing eye. There were 3278 patient records with a mean age at the first visit of 7.8 ± 3.9 years. There were 80 (2.4%) children with VI, 62.5% of which were attributed to amblyopia. A total of 94% of VI was preventable or treatable. The most common diagnoses were refractive error (87.5%), strabismus (27.5%), and allergic eye disease (20.0%). Amblyopia is the major cause of pediatric VI in Barbados and is largely avoidable.

An abstract is unavailable. This article is available as a PDF only.