Preclinical orofacial pain research produces unusually diverse data. Facial expression, jaw use, feeding, stimulus-evoked responses, trigeminal neural activity, tissue imaging, biomechanics and molecular profiles each capture a different part of the pain process. Artificial intelligence (AI) is often discussed in this field as if it were synonymous with automated grimace scoring. That view is too narrow. Direct applications are concentrated in video-based phenotyping, whereas many other experimental systems are better described as AI-ready. To distinguish opportunity from accomplishment, this review separates direct orofacial evidence from task-level precedents in computational ethology, non-orofacial pain, systems neuroscience, digital pathology, joint imaging, single-cell modeling, physics-guided biomechanics and organoid screening. Each transfer claim is framed as an evidence bridge: an existing orofacial experiment, an external AI precedent, a defined input-output task and a validation requirement in the target system. We examine facial and functional phenotyping, tissue imaging, trigeminal calcium imaging, single-cell and spatial omics, multimodal state estimation, therapeutic discovery and closed-loop experimentation. We also define what should not be labeled AI, including routine clustering, differential-expression testing and conventional finite-element analysis. Two forward-looking concepts receive particular attention. A virtual pain cell would predict cell-state responses to perturbations in trigeminal neurons, satellite glia, fibroblasts or immune cells. A virtual temporomandibular joint would couple geometry and mechanics to tissue remodeling, nociceptor activity and pain-related behavior. Neither system yet exists in a validated form. Their value will depend on prospective perturbation tests, animal-level validation, uncertainty reporting and performance against simple baselines. AI can move the field from isolated measurements toward integrated, testable models, but only when external precedents are treated as hypotheses for transfer rather than evidence that the transfer has already succeeded.