Nguyen Hanh

Nguyen Hanh


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 January 2024 in Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NHNguyen Hanh
Nguyen Hanh
JSJeng-Ywan Shih
Jeng-Ywan Shih
KCKuei-Hsiang Chen
Kuei-Hsiang Chen
PSPenjit Srinophakun
Penjit Srinophakun
CCChen-Yaw Chiu
Chen-Yaw Chiu
YCYu-Kaung Chang
Yu-Kaung Chang

28 August 2023 in Membranes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KCKuei-Hsiang Chen
Kuei-Hsiang Chen
You-Ren LaiYou-Ren Lai
You-Ren Lai
NHNguyen Hanh
Nguyen Hanh
SWSteven S.-S. Wang
Steven S.-S. Wang
Yu-Kaung ChangYu-Kaung Chang
Yu-Kaung Chang
In this study, a polyacrylonitrile nanofiber membrane was first hydrolyzed and then functionalized with tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (P-Tris), then used as an affinity nanofiber membrane for lysozyme adsorption in membrane chromatography. The dynamic adsorption behavior of lysozyme was investigated in a flow system under various operating parameters, including adsorption pHs, initial feed lysozyme concentration, loading flow rate, and the number of stacked membrane layers. Four different kinetic models, pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, Elovich, and intraparticle diffusion kinetic models, were applied to experimental data from breakthrough curves of lysozyme. The results showed that the dynamic adsorption results were fitted well with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The breakthrough curve experimental results show significant differences in the breakthrough time, the dynamic binding capacity, the length of the mass transfer zone, and the utilization rate of the membrane bed under different operating parameters. Four dynamic adsorption models (i.e., Bohart–Adams, Thomas, Yoon–Nelson, and BDST models) were used to analyze the breakthrough curve characteristics of the dynamic adsorption experiments. Among them, the Yoon–Nelson model was the best model to fit the breakthrough curve. However, some of the theoretical results based on the Thomas and Bohart–Adams model analyses of the breakthrough curve fit well with the experimental data, with an error percentage of <5%. The Bohart–Adams model has the largest difference from the experimental results; hence it is not suitable for breakthrough curve analysis. These results significantly impact dynamic kinetics studies and breakthrough curve characteristic analysis in membrane bed chromatography.

4 November 2023 in Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KCKuei-Hsiang Chen
Kuei-Hsiang Chen
You-Ren LaiYou-Ren Lai
You-Ren Lai
NHNguyen Hanh
Nguyen Hanh

8 November 2023 in Biochemical Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSung-Ta Lin
Sung-Ta Lin
NHNguyen Hanh
Nguyen Hanh
COChien Wei Ooi
Chien Wei Ooi
XTXue Er Crystal Thew
Xue Er Crystal Thew
BLBing-Lan Liu
Bing-Lan Liu
YCYu-Kaung Chang
Yu-Kaung Chang

4 September 2025 in Biochemical Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCChien-Hsing Chiang
Chien-Hsing Chiang
NHNguyen Hanh
Nguyen Hanh
Chanin PanjapornponChanin Panjapornpon
Chanin Panjapornpon
MCManop Charoenchaitrakool
Manop Charoenchaitrakool
KSKandis Sudsakorn
Kandis Sudsakorn
YCYu-Kaung Chang
Yu-Kaung Chang

2 January 2026 in Biochemical Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TTThi Tam An Tran
Thi Tam An Tran
EGEdouard Gnoumou
Edouard Gnoumou
QLQuang-Vinh Le
Quang-Vinh Le
NHNguyen Hanh
Nguyen Hanh
NHNanthiya Hansupalak
Nanthiya Hansupalak
YCYu-Kaung Chang
Yu-Kaung Chang