Introduction: The Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) examination is a common screening instrument to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in Western countries. However, further work is needed to identify optimal SLUMS cutoff scores for screening MCI and dementia in Chinese populations. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility and diagnostic accuracy of the SLUMS examination in the diagnosis of dementia and MCI in Chinese population. Methods: A cross-sectional multicenter design was conducted. Patients were recruited from the outpatient department of our neurology and psychiatric clinics. The establishment of the gold standard for the SLUMS-Chinese version (SLUMS-C) to detect MCI and dementia was based on the clinical criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) and related neuropsychological testing conducted by 3 certified dementia specialists. The consistency of the diagnosis process and administering SLUMS-C were established prior to the beginning of the study. Data were analyzed, and sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated. Results: A total of 367 subjects were recruited. The SLUMS-C did not show satisfactory AUCs for the preliminary detection of normal cognitive status and MCI by different educational levels (all AUC 0.32–0.54). However, the SLUMS-C showed acceptable AUCs for the preliminary detection of dementia by different educational levels (all AUC 0.78–0.81). An educational level of senior high school showed the best cutoff, sensitivity, and specificity. The SLUMS-C scores to detect dementia for individuals with at least high school education and less than high school education were <24 and 22, respectively. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the SLUMS-C could be a beneficial and convenient screening instrument to detect dementia in Chinese population. After community screening, a comprehensive clinical evaluation including cognitive assessment, functional status, corroborative history, and imaging confirmation is needed.

Background: Despite the high prevalence of dementia among residents living in long-term care facilities in Taiwan, most care providers in these facilities have not received adequate training to deal with the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). An original care and management model for BPSD has been developed, and model-based recommendations for an education and training program have been made. However, empirical testing has not yet been conducted to determine the efficacy of this program. Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of using the Watch–Assess–Need intervention–Think (WANT) education and training program for BPSD in long-term care settings. Methods: A mixed-method design was used. Twenty care providers and 20 corresponding care receivers (residents with dementia) from a nursing home in southern Taiwan were enrolled. Data were collected using a variety of measurement tools, including the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, Attitude towards Dementia Care Scale, and Dementia Behavior Disturbance Self-efficacy Scale. Qualitative data, including care-provider perspectives on the efficacy of the WANT education and training program, were also collected. Repeated measures were conducted on the results of quantitative data analysis, whereas content analysis was performed on the results of qualitative data analysis. Results: Findings indicate that the program relieves agitated behavior (p = .01), alleviates depression in those with dementia (p < .001), and enhances care-provider attitudes toward dementia care (p = .01). However, no significant improvement was found in self-efficacy among the care providers (p = .11). In terms of qualitative outcomes, care providers indicated they perceived improved self-efficacy in managing BPSD, improved ability to view problems from a more need-centered perspective, improved attitudes toward dementia and patients' BPSD, and decreased care burden and stress. Conclusions/Implications for Practice: The study found the WANT education and training program to be feasible in clinical practice. Because of this program's simple and easy-to-remember characteristics, it is recommended that it be vigorously promoted to care providers in both long-term institutional and home care settings to help them effectively address the BPSD.

Making advanced directives is challenging in Asia. The hindering factors and perceived needs for advanced directives for people with dementia and their families have not been fully explored in Taiwan. In this study, we aimed to identify the barriers and perceived needs of people with mild dementia and the families of people with dementia within the cultural context of Taiwan for advanced directives. A qualitative descriptive design with purposive sampling and content analysis was used to collect and analyze the data. Thirteen people with mild dementia and thirty-two families of people with dementia were recruited. Our findings indicated that the hindering factors for people with mild dementia and the families of people with dementia to make advanced directives included “talking about death is a taboo”, “the timing is not right”, “cultural values of filial piety”, “male protagonist’s social status”, and “insufficient information on advanced directive”. The perceived needs for participants in making advanced directive decisions were “a wish to die without suffering”, “wanting to rely on others to make a decision”, and “an increased awareness of information”. This research offers valuable insights into the barriers and needs related to advanced directives for people with mild dementia and the families of people with dementia in Taiwan. These findings address the identified challenges and needs to develop effective solutions to help healthcare providers to better facilitate the decision-making process for advanced directives.

Advance care planning (ACP) has the potential to improve the outcomes of end-of-life care for residents in nursing homes. The aim of this study was to determine whether an ACP program was beneficial for nursing home residents by assessing end-of-life indicators. An experimental study with a retrospective chart review was conducted. In total, 37 residents in the intervention group participated in an institutional advance care planning program for 1 year, and their chart data over 1 year were collected following the completion of the program; 33 residents in the control group had died within 1 year before the start date of program, and their chart data were reviewed retrospectively. Chi-square and t tests were used to examine four indicators of the quality of end-of-life care. Compared with the control group, the intervention group had a higher proportion of do-not-resuscitate directives, hospice care before death, and deaths in the nursing home, and fewer hospitalizations and deaths in an emergency department. ACP programs may improve the quality of end-of-life care for nursing home residents in Taiwan. Further research across different long-term care facilities is warranted.