A study was conducted in southern Georgia, USA, to evaluate how the hydraulic properties of the compacted clay barrier layer in a final landfill cover changed over a 4-year service life. The cover was part of a test section constructed in a large drainage lysimeter that allowed continuous monitoring of the water balance. Patterns in the drainage (i.e., flow from the bottom of the cover) record suggest that preferential flow paths developed in the clay barrier soon after construction, apparently in response to desiccation cracking. After four years, the clay barrier was excavated and examined for changes in soil structure and hydraulic conductivity. Tests were conducted in situ with a sealed double-ring infiltrometer and two-stage borehole permeameters and in the laboratory on hand-carved blocks taken during construction and after four years of service. The in situ and laboratory tests indicated that the hydraulic conductivity increased approximately three orders of magnitude (from ≈ 10−7 to ≈ 10−4 cm∙ s−1...
1 January 2001 in International Journal of Phytoremediation
Five methods to assess percolation rate from alternative earthen final covers (AEFCs) are described in the context of the precision with which the percolation rate can be estimated: trend analysis, tracer methods, water balance method, Darcy's Law calculations, and lysimetry. Trend evaluation of water content data is the least precise method because it cannot be used alone to assess the percolation rate. The precision of percolation rates estimated using tracer methods depends on the tracer concentration, percolation rate, and the sensitivity of the chemical extraction and analysis methods. Percolation rates determined using the water balance method have a precision of approximately 100 mm/yr in humid climates and 50 mm/yr in semiarid and drier climates, which is too large to demonstrate that an AEFC is meeting typical equivalency criterion (30 mm/yr or less). In most cases, the precision will be much poorer. Percolation rates computed using Darcy's Law with measured profiles of water content and matric suction typically have a precision that is about two orders of magnitude (or more) greater than the computed percolation rate. The Darcy's Law method can only be used for performance assessment if the estimated percolation rate is much smaller than the equivalency criterion and preferential flow is not present. Lysimetry provides the most precise estimates of percolation rate, but the precision depends on the method used to measure the collected water. The lysimeter used in the Alternative Cover Assessment Program (ACAP), which is described in this paper, can be used to estimate percolation rates with a precision between 0.00004 to 0.5 mm/yr, depending on the measurement method and the flow rates.
Methane emissions were measured at several locations at a typical solid waste facility using a static chamber technique. At the entire facility, methane flux varied from −13.6 to 1,755 g m−2 day−1 . The flux data had an arithmetic mean value of 71.3 g m−2 day−1 and a geometric mean value of 18.6 g m−2 day−1 . At this site, methane emission was generally lower on the side slopes relative to the flat areas of the landfill. The spatial variability of methane flux was characterized by point kriging and inverse distance weighing (IDW) in an intensive study of a 61×61-m area. The geospatial means in this area obtained by both methods were almost identical (20.9 versus 20.8 g m−2 day−1 ). These geospatial means for the area were also similar to the arithmetic mean (24.5 g m−2 day−1 ) , but 3.4 times the geometric mean (6.5 g m−2 day−1 ) . Methane oxidation was evaluated at the surface of the landfill and at several depths within the cover soil using stable isotope techniques. The δ C13 of C H4 averaged −55.4% in...