Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes

Mr. Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes

Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará,, Belém, Pará, Brazil
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 July 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJonathan Nascimento Priantti
Jonathan Nascimento Priantti
MVMaysa Vilbert
Maysa Vilbert
TMThiago Madeira
Thiago Madeira
Francisco Cezar Aquino de MoraesFrancisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes
Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes
EHErica C. Koch Hein
Erica C. Koch Hein
LCLudimila Cavalcante
Ludimila Cavalcante
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rechallenging advanced melanoma patients with BRAFi/MEKi. Seven studies, accounting for 400 patients, were included. Most patients received immunotherapy before the rechallenge, and 79% underwent rechallenge with the combination of BRAFi/MEKi. We found a median progression-free survival of 5 months and overall survival of 9.8 months. The one-year survival rate was 42.63%. Regarding response, ORR was 34% and DCR 65%. There were no new or unexpected safety concerns. Rechallenge with BRAFi/MEKi can improve outcomes in advanced melanoma patients with refractory disease. These findings have significant implications for clinical practice, particularly in the setting of progressive disease in later lines and limited treatment options.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Bárbara Ferraz Barbosa, MDBárbara Ferraz Barbosa, MD
Bárbara Ferraz Barbosa, MD
Francisco Cezar Aquino de MoraesFrancisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes
Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes
Camila Bordignon BarbosaCamila Bordignon Barbosa
Camila Bordignon Barbosa
PSPlínio Takashi Karubi Palavicini Santos
Plínio Takashi Karubi Palavicini Santos
ISIzael Pereira da Silva
Izael Pereira da Silva
MARIANNE RODRIGUES FERNANDESMARIANNE RODRIGUES FERNANDES
MARIANNE RODRIGUES FERNANDES
Background: A malfunction in the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) is associated with obesity in rare genetic syndromes; setmelanotide is a new drug that activates this receptor and is being used to treat severe obesity. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of setmelanotide for weight loss in severe obesity linked to human MC4R deficiency. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials using setmelanotide. We considered a p-value ≤ 0.05 statistically significant. Results: We included 376 patients, of whom 328 (87.2%) received setmelanotide for a mean follow-up of 52 weeks. The mean age was 32.8 (14.67) years. Weight loss was significant (MD −3.52; 95% CI −3.98, −3.05; p = 0.01; I2 = 92%), with an average proportion of −6.91% weight loss during treatment. Changes in BMI showed an MD of −10.55 kg/m2 in patients > 18 years and −0.61 kg/m2 in patients < 18 years (BMI score). However, the drug was associated with a higher risk of skin hyperpigmentation (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.55, 0.80; p = 0.08). Conclusions: Our results support the use of setmelanotide in treating severe obesity.

23 November 2024 in The Breast
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MDMaria Inez Dacoregio
Maria Inez Dacoregio
IMIsabella Michelon
Isabella Michelon
CCCaio Castro
Caio Castro
Francisco Cezar Aquino de MoraesFrancisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes
Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes
GAGuilherme Rossato de Almeida
Guilherme Rossato de Almeida
RCRicardo L. B. Costa
Ricardo L. B. Costa
Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG), a first-in-class anti-trophoblast cell surface antigen-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), has shown clinically meaningful improvement in outcomes of patients with breast cancer (BC). However, it has also been accompanied by significant toxicity. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and tolerability of SG in this patient population. We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, and ASCO and ESMO websites for clinical trials (CTs) assessing the safety of SG in BC patients. All analyses were performed in R software (v.4.2.2) using random effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 test. Seven studies - three randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and four single-arm phase I/II - were included, comprising 928 patients receiving SG and 576 on treatment of physician's choice (TPC). Most patients had triple negative BC (54.4 %, n = 505), metastatic disease (89.8 %, n = 833), and were heavily pretreated (at least two lines of prior therapy). Most common all-grade adverse events (AEs) were: neutropenia (70 %, 95 % CI, 64-76 %), followed by nausea (62 %, 95 % CI, 55-68 %), diarrhea (54 %, 95 % CI 47-60 %) and anemia (51 %, 95 % CI, 38-65 %). Regarding high-grade AEs, 46 % of patients developed grade ≥3 neutropenia. Compared to TPC, we observed a higher risk of neutropenia (OR 3.11, 95 % CI 1.62-5.99, I2 = 81 %; p < 0.001), diarrhea (OR 6.82, 95 % CI 3.99-11.66, I2 = 64 %; p < 0.001) and anemia (OR 2.26, 95 % CI 1.20-4.27, I2 = 78 %; p = 0.012) for those on SG. Dose reductions and treatment discontinuation were reported in 22 % and 4 % of patients, respectively, and 19 deaths (2 %) were documented. Most of them were not deemed to be treated-related. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides extensive data on the safety and management of SG toxicity in BC patients across clinical trials. Concerning rates of neutropenia, nausea diarrhea, and anemia were reported. We highlight the need for protocols establishing prophylactic measures and strategies to mitigate SG-related toxicity.

30 September 2024 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francisco Cezar Aquino de MoraesFrancisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes
Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes
ABAlícia Batista de Almeida Barbosa
Alícia Batista de Almeida Barbosa
VSVitor Kendi Tsuchiya Sano
Vitor Kendi Tsuchiya Sano
Francinny Alves KellyFrancinny Alves Kelly
Francinny Alves Kelly
Rommel Mario BurbanoRommel Mario Burbano
Rommel Mario Burbano
Fluoropyrimidines are chemotherapy drugs utilized to treat a variety of solid tumors. These drugs predominantly rely on the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), which is encoded by the DPYD gene, for their metabolism. Genetic mutations affecting this gene can cause DPYD deficiency, disrupting pyrimidine metabolism and increasing the risk of toxicity in cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil. The severity and type of toxic reactions are influenced by genetic and demographic factors and, in certain instances, can result in patient mortality. Among the more than 50 identified variants of DPYD, only a subset has clinical significance, leading to the production of enzymes that are either non-functional or impaired. The study aims to examine treatment-related mortality in cancer patients undergoing fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy, comparing those with and without DPD deficiency. The meta-analysis selected and evaluated 9685 studies from Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science databases. Only studies examining the main DPYD variants (DPYD*2A, DPYD p.D949V, DPYD*13 and DPYD HapB3) were included. Statistical Analysis was performed using R, version 4.2.3. Data were examined using the Mantel-Haenszel method and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. There were 36 prospective and retrospective studies included, accounting for 16,005 patients. Most studies assessed colorectal cancer, representing 86.49% of patients. Other gastrointestinal cancers were evaluated by 11 studies, breast cancer by nine studies and head and neck cancers by five studies. Four DPYD variants were identified as predictors of severe fluoropyrimidines toxicity in literature review: DPYD*2A (rs3918290), DPYD p.D949V (rs67376798), DPYD*13 (rs55886062) and DPYD Hap23 (rs56038477). All 36 studies assessed the DPYD*2A variant, while 20 assessed DPYD p.D949V, 7 assessed DPYD*13, and 9 assessed DPYDHap23. Among the 587 patients who tested positive for at least one DPYD variant, 13 died from fluoropyrimidine toxicity. Conversely, in the non-carrier group there were 14 treatment-related deaths. Carriers of DPYD variants was found to be significantly correlated with treatment-related mortality (OR = 34.86, 95% CI 13.96–87.05; p < 0.05). This study improves our comprehension of how the DPYD gene impacts cancer patients receiving fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. Identifying mutations associated with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency may help predict the likelihood of serious side effects and fatalities. This knowledge can be applied to adjust medication doses before starting treatment, thus reducing the occurrence of these critical outcomes.

29 November 2023 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francisco Cezar Aquino de MoraesFrancisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes
Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes
EPEric Pasqualotto
Eric Pasqualotto
LLLucca Moreira Lopes
Lucca Moreira Lopes
MSMaria Eduarda Cavalcanti Souza
Maria Eduarda Cavalcanti Souza
Anna Luíza Soares de Oliveira RodriguesAnna Luíza Soares de Oliveira Rodrigues
Anna Luíza Soares de Oliveira Rodrigues
NSNey Santos
Ney Santos
Background: Paclitaxel and carboplatin is the standard chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. However, the benefit of adding programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors to chemotherapy is still unclear. Method: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials that investigated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We computed hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used DerSimonian and Laird random-effect models for all endpoints. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. R, version 4.2.3, was used for statistical analyses. Results: A total of three studies and 1,431 patients were included. Compared with carboplatin plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) rate (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.23–0.44; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) at 30 months (RR 3.13; 95% CI 1.26–7.78; p = 0.01) were significant in favor of the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus carboplatin and paclitaxel group in the mismatch repair–deficient subgroup. However, there were no significant differences in the mismatch repair–proficient subgroup for PFS (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.50–1.08; p = 0.117) or OS at 30 months (RR 2.24; 95% CI 0.79–6.39; p = 0.13). Conclusion: Immunotherapy plus carboplatin-paclitaxel increased significantly PFS and OS among patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, with a significant benefit in the mismatch repair–deficient and high microsatellite instability population.

21 February 2024 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francisco Cezar Aquino de MoraesFrancisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes
Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes
EPEric Pasqualotto
Eric Pasqualotto
MCMatheus Pedrotti Chavez
Matheus Pedrotti Chavez
RFRafael Oliva Morgado Ferreira
Rafael Oliva Morgado Ferreira
Tiago Biachi de CastriaTiago Biachi de Castria
Tiago Biachi de Castria
Rommel Mario BurbanoRommel Mario Burbano
Rommel Mario Burbano
Background: The benefit of adding Zolbetuximab to the treatment in patients with Claudin-18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJ) is not yet fully elucidated. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated Zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for GC or GEJ adenocarcinoma. We computed hazard-ratios (HRs) or odds-ratios (ORs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Three studies and 1,233 patients were included. Comparing with Zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, progression-free survival (PFS) rate (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.49–0.84; p < 0.01) and overall survival (OS) rate (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.62–0.83; p < 0.01) were significant in favor of the Zolbetuximab group. Regarding effectiveness, the Objective Response Rate (ORR) was (OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.87–1.53; p = 0.34). Conclusions: In this comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs, the incorporation of Zolbetuximab alongside chemotherapy offers a promising prospect for reshaping the established treatment paradigms for patients diagnosed with advanced CLDN18.2-positive GC/GEJ cancer.