Background: Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is a cluster of microvascular disorders with unclear pathological mechanisms. The microbiota-gut-brain axis is an essential regulatory mechanism between gut microbes and their host. Therefore, the compositional and functional gut microbiota alterations lead to cerebrovascular disease pathogenesis. The current study aims to determine the alteration and clinical value of the gut microbiota in CSVD patients.Methods: Sixty-four CSVD patients and 18 matched healthy controls (HCs) were included in our study. All the participants underwent neuropsychological tests, and the multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging depicted the changes in brain structure and function. Plasma samples were collected, and the fecal samples were analyzed with 16S rRNA gene sequencing.Results: Based on the alpha diversity analysis, the CSVD group had significantly decreased Shannon and enhanced Simpson compared to the HC group. At the genus level, there was a significant increase in the relative abundances of Parasutterella, Anaeroglobus, Megasphaera, Akkermansia, Collinsella, and Veillonella in the CSVD group. Moreover, these genera with significant differences in CSVD patients revealed significant correlations with cognitive assessments, plasma levels of the blood-brain barrier-/inflammation-related indexes, and structural/functional magnetic resonance imaging changes. Functional prediction demonstrated that lipoic acid metabolism was significantly higher in CSVD patients than HCs. Additionally, a composite biomarker depending on six gut microbiota at the genus level displayed an area under the curve of 0.834 to distinguish CSVD patients from HCs using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm.Conclusion: The evident changes in gut microbiota composition in CSVD patients were correlated with clinical features and pathological changes of CSVD. Combining these gut microbiota using the LASSO algorithm helped identify CSVD accurately.
9 February 2023 in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Objective: Anxiety is one of the most common psychiatric symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD), and brain iron deposition is considered to be one of the pathological mechanisms of PD. The objective of this study was to explore alterations in brain iron deposition in PD patients with anxiety compared to PD patients without anxiety, especially in the fear circuit.Methods: Sixteen PD patients with anxiety, 23 PD patients without anxiety, and 26 healthy elderly controls were enrolled prospectively. All subjects underwent neuropsychological assessments and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was used to study morphological brain differences between the groups. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), an MRI technique capable of quantifying susceptibility changes in brain tissue, was used to compare susceptibility changes in the whole brain among the three groups. The correlations between brain susceptibility changes and anxiety scores quantified using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) were compared and analyzed.Results: PD patients with anxiety had a longer duration of PD and higher HAMA scores than PD patients without anxiety. No morphological brain differences were observed between the groups. In contrast, voxel-based and ROI-based QSM analyses showed that PD patients with anxiety had significantly increased QSM values in the medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, precuneus, and angular cortex. Furthermore, the QSM values of some of these brain regions were positively correlated with the HAMA scores (medial prefrontal cortex: r = 0.255, p = 0.04; anterior cingulate cortex: r = 0.381, p < 0.01; hippocampus: r = 0.496, p < 0.01).Conclusion: Our findings support the idea that anxiety in PD is associated with iron burden in the brain fear circuit, providing a possible new approach to explaining the potential neural mechanism of anxiety in PD.
1 September 2022 in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Background: Reliable and individualized biomarkers are crucial for identifying early cognitive impairment in subcortical small-vessel disease (SSVD) patients. Personalized brain age prediction can effectively reflect cognitive impairment. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the association of brain age with cognitive function in SSVD patients and assess the potential value of brain age in clinical assessment of SSVD.Materials and methods: A prediction model for brain age using the relevance vector regression algorithm was developed using 35 healthy controls. Subsequently, the prediction model was tested using 51 SSVD patients [24 subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) patients and 27 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients] to identify brain age-related imaging features. A support vector machine (SVM)-based classification model was constructed to differentiate MCI from SCI patients. The neurobiological basis of brain age-related imaging features was also investigated based on cognitive assessments and oxidative stress biomarkers.Results: The gray matter volume (GMV) imaging features accurately predicted brain age in individual patients with SSVD (R2 = 0.535, p < 0.001). The GMV features were primarily distributed across the subcortical system (e.g., thalamus) and dorsal attention network. SSVD patients with age acceleration showed significantly poorer Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. The classification model based on GMV features could accurately distinguish MCI patients from SCI patients (area under the curve = 0.883). The classification outputs of the classification model exhibited significant associations with MoCA scores, Trail Making Tests A and B scores, Stroop Color and Word Test C scores, information processing speed total scores, and plasma levels of total antioxidant capacity in SSVD patients.Conclusion: Brain age can be accurately quantified using GMV imaging data and shows potential clinical value for identifying early cognitive impairment in SSVD patients.
Objective: White matter hyperintensity (WMH) in patients with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is strongly associated with cognitive impairment. However, the severity of WMH does not coincide fully with cognitive impairment. This study aims to explore the differences in the dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) of WMH with cognitively matched and mismatched patients, to better understand the underlying mechanisms from a quantitative perspective.Methods: The resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) and cognitive function scale assessment of the patients were acquired. Preprocessing of the rs-fMRI data was performed, and this was followed by dFNC analysis to obtain the dFNC metrics. Compared the dFNC and dFNC metrics within different states between mismatch and match group, we analyzed the correlation between dFNC metrics and cognitive function. Finally, to analyze the reasons for the differences between the mismatch and match groups, the CSVD imaging features of each patient were quantified with the assistance of the uAI Discover system.Results: The 149 CSVD patients included 20 cases of “Type I mismatch,” 51 cases of Type I match, 38 cases of “Type II mismatch,” and 40 cases of “Type II match.” Using dFNC analysis, we found that the fraction time (FT) and mean dwell time (MDT) of State 2 differed significantly between “Type I match” and “Type I mismatch”; the FT of States 1 and 4 differed significantly between “Type II match” and “Type II mismatch.” Correlation analysis revealed that dFNC metrics in CSVD patients correlated with executive function and information processing speed among the various cognitive functions. Through quantitative analysis, we found that the number of perivascular spaces and bilateral medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) scores differed significantly between “Type I match” and “Type I mismatch,” while the left MTA score differed between “Type II match” and “Type II mismatch.”Conclusion: Different mechanisms were implicated in these two types of mismatch: Type I affected higher-order networks, and may be related to the number of perivascular spaces and brain atrophy, whereas Type II affected the primary networks, and may be related to brain atrophy and the years of education.