Aziza Nassar

Dr. Aziza Nassar

Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, Illinois, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2009 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMarta Santisteban
Marta Santisteban
JRJennifer M. Reiman
Jennifer M. Reiman
MAMichael K. Asiedu
Michael K. Asiedu
MBMarshall D. Behrens
Marshall D. Behrens
Aziza NassarAziza Nassar
Aziza Nassar
KKKeith L Knutson
Keith L Knutson
The breast cancer stem cell (BCSC) hypotheses suggest that breast cancer is derived from a single tumor-initiating cell with stem-like properties, but the source of these cells is unclear. We previously observed that induction of an immune response against an epithelial breast cancer led in vivo to the T-cell–dependent outgrowth of a tumor, the cells of which had undergone epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). The resulting mesenchymal tumor cells had a CD24−/loCD44+ phenotype, consistent with BCSCs. In the present study, we found that EMT was induced by CD8 T cells and the resulting tumors had characteristics of BCSCs, including potent tumorigenicity, ability to reestablish an epithelial tumor, and enhanced resistance to drugs and radiation. In contrast to the hierarchal cancer stem cell hypothesis, which suggests that breast cancer arises from the transformation of a resident tissue stem cell, our results show that EMT can produce the BCSC phenotype. These findings have several important implications related to disease progression and relapse. [Cancer Res 2009;69(7):2887–95]

1 October 2000 in The American Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJerzy Lasota
Jerzy Lasota
AWAgnieszka Wozniak
Agnieszka Wozniak
MSMaarit Sarlomo-Rikala
Maarit Sarlomo-Rikala
JRJanusz Rys
Janusz Rys
RKRadzislaw Kordek
Radzislaw Kordek
MMMarkku Miettinen
Markku Miettinen

1 December 2016 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PKPujan Kandel
Pujan Kandel
GTGhassan Tranesh
Ghassan Tranesh
Aziza NassarAziza Nassar
Aziza Nassar
RBRussell Bingham
Russell Bingham
MRMassimo Raimondo
Massimo Raimondo
MWMichael B. Wallace
Michael B. Wallace

13 January 2015 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSamar M. Said
Samar M. Said
DVDaniel W. Visscher
Daniel W. Visscher
Aziza NassarAziza Nassar
Aziza Nassar
RFRyan D. Frank
Ryan D. Frank
RVRobert A Vierkant
Robert A Vierkant
ADAmy C. Degnim
Amy C. Degnim
BACKGROUND: Based on its cytologic features, and its co‐occurrence with atypical hyperplasia and breast cancer, flat epithelial atypia (FEA) has been proposed as a precursor lesion on the pathway to the development of breast cancer. It is often referred to as an “atypical” or high‐risk lesion. However, to the authors' knowledge, the long‐term risk of breast cancer in women with FEA is undefined.METHODS: Specimens with FEA were identified among excisional breast biopsies in the Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease Cohort, which includes 11,591 women who had benign biopsy findings at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota between 1967 and 2001. Breast cancer risk among subsets of patients with FEA and nonproliferative, proliferative, and atypical hyperplasia (AH) was assessed using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) compared with the Iowa Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry.RESULTS: FEA was identified in 282 women (2.4%); 130 had associated AH (46%) and 152 (54%) were classified as having proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA). With median follow‐up of 16.8 years, the SIR for breast cancer in patients with AH plus FEA was 4.74 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.17‐6.81) versus 4.23 (95% CI, 3.44‐5.13) for those with AH without FEA (P = .59). The SIR for patients with PDWA plus FEA was 2.04 (95% CI, 1.23‐3.19) versus 1.90 (95% CI, 1.72‐2.09) for patients with PDWA without FEA (P = .76).CONCLUSIONS: FEA is an uncommon finding in women with benign breast disease. FEA does not appear to convey an independent risk of breast cancer beyond that of the associated PDWA or AH. Cancer 2015;121:1548–1555. © 2015 American Cancer Society.


8 February 2014 in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DVDaniel W. Visscher
Daniel W. Visscher
Aziza NassarAziza Nassar
Aziza Nassar
ADAmy C. Degnim
Amy C. Degnim
MFMarlene H. Frost
Marlene H. Frost
RVRobert A Vierkant
Robert A Vierkant
LHLynn C. Hartmann
Lynn C. Hartmann
Over one million American women have a benign breast biopsy annually. Sclerosing adenosis (SA) is a common, but poorly understood benign breast lesion demonstrating increased numbers of distorted lobules accompanied by stromal fibrosis. Few studies of its association with breast cancer have been conducted, with contradictory results. We studied SA in the Mayo Benign Breast Disease (BBD) Cohort, which includes women who had benign biopsies at Mayo-Rochester 1967–2001. Breast cancer risk in defined subsets was assessed using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), relative to the Iowa Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. This BBD cohort of 13,434 women was followed for a median of 15.7 years. SA was present in 3,733 women (27.8 %) who demonstrated an SIR for breast cancer of 2.10 (95 % CI 1.91–2.30) versus an SIR of 1.52 (95 % CI 1.42–1.63) for the 9,701 women without SA. SA was present in 62.4 % of biopsies with proliferative disease without atypia and 55.1 % of biopsies with atypical hyperplasia. The presence of SA stratified risk in subsets of women defined by age, involution status, and family history. However, SA does not further stratify risk in women diagnosed with other forms of proliferative breast disease, either with or without atypia. SA is a common proliferative lesion of the breast which, as a single feature, conveys an approximate doubling of breast cancer risk. Its role in breast carcinogenesis remains undefined; its presence may aid in risk prediction for women after a breast biopsy.