Paul Yushkevich

Dr. Paul Yushkevich


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2006 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PYPaul Yushkevich
Paul Yushkevich
JPJoseph Piven
Joseph Piven
HHHeather Cody Hazlett
Heather Cody Hazlett
RSRachel Gimpel Smith
Rachel Gimpel Smith
SHSean Ho
Sean Ho
GGGuido Gerig
Guido Gerig

8 April 2010 in IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NTNicholas Tustison
Nicholas Tustison
BABrian B. Avants
Brian B. Avants
PCPhilip A Cook
Philip A Cook
YZYuanjie Zheng
Yuanjie Zheng
AEAlexander Egan
Alexander Egan
JGJames C. Gee
James C. Gee
A variant of the popular nonparametric nonuniform intensity normalization (N3) algorithm is proposed for bias field correction. Given the superb performance of N3 and its public availability, it has been the subject of several evaluation studies. These studies have demonstrated the importance of certain parameters associated with the B -spline least-squares fitting. We propose the substitution of a recently developed fast and robust B-spline approximation routine and a modified hierarchical optimization scheme for improved bias field correction over the original N3 algorithm. Similar to the N3 algorithm, we also make the source code, testing, and technical documentation of our contribution, which we denote as ¿N4ITK,¿ available to the public through the Insight Toolkit of the National Institutes of Health. Performance assessment is demonstrated using simulated data from the publicly available Brainweb database, hyperpolarized 3 He lung image data, and 9.4T postmortem hippocampus data.

26 June 2012 in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HWHongzhi Wang
Hongzhi Wang
JSJung W. Suh
Jung W. Suh
SDSandhitsu R. Das
Sandhitsu R. Das
JPJohn B. Pluta
John B. Pluta
CCCaryne Craige
Caryne Craige
PYPaul Yushkevich
Paul Yushkevich
Multi-atlas segmentation is an effective approach for automatically labeling objects of interest in biomedical images. In this approach, multiple expert-segmented example images, called atlases, are registered to a target image, and deformed atlas segmentations are combined using label fusion. Among the proposed label fusion strategies, weighted voting with spatially varying weight distributions derived from atlas-target intensity similarity have been particularly successful. However, one limitation of these strategies is that the weights are computed independently for each atlas, without taking into account the fact that different atlases may produce similar label errors. To address this limitation, we propose a new solution for the label fusion problem in which weighted voting is formulated in terms of minimizing the total expectation of labeling error and in which pairwise dependency between atlases is explicitly modeled as the joint probability of two atlases making a segmentation error at a voxel. This probability is approximated using intensity similarity between a pair of atlases and the target image in the neighborhood of each voxel. We validate our method in two medical image segmentation problems: hippocampus segmentation and hippocampus subfield segmentation in magnetic resonance (MR) images. For both problems, we show consistent and significant improvement over label fusion strategies that assign atlas weights independently.

1 February 2010 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BABrian B. Avants
Brian B. Avants
PYPaul Yushkevich
Paul Yushkevich
JPJohn Pluta
John Pluta
DMDavid Minkoff
David Minkoff
MKMarc Korczykowski
Marc Korczykowski
JGJames C. Gee
James C. Gee

2 September 2014 in Human Brain Mapping
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PYPaul Yushkevich
Paul Yushkevich
JPJohn B. Pluta
John B. Pluta
HWHongzhi Wang
Hongzhi Wang
LXLong Xie
Long Xie
SDSong-Lin Ding
Song-Lin Ding
DWDavid A. Wolk
David A. Wolk
We evaluate a fully automatic technique for labeling hippocampal subfields and cortical subregions in the medial temporal lobe in in vivo 3 Tesla MRI. The method performs segmentation on a T2‐weighted MRI scan with 0.4 × 0.4 × 2.0 mm3 resolution, partial brain coverage, and oblique orientation. Hippocampal subfields, entorhinal cortex, and perirhinal cortex are labeled using a pipeline that combines multi‐atlas label fusion and learning‐based error correction. In contrast to earlier work on automatic subfield segmentation in T2‐weighted MRI [Yushkevich et al., 2010], our approach requires no manual initialization, labels hippocampal subfields over a greater anterior‐posterior extent, and labels the perirhinal cortex, which is further subdivided into Brodmann areas 35 and 36. The accuracy of the automatic segmentation relative to manual segmentation is measured using cross‐validation in 29 subjects from a study of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and is highest for the dentate gyrus (Dice coefficient is 0.823), CA1 (0.803), perirhinal cortex (0.797), and entorhinal cortex (0.786) labels. A larger cohort of 83 subjects is used to examine the effects of aMCI in the hippocampal region using both subfield volume and regional subfield thickness maps. Most significant differences between aMCI and healthy aging are observed bilaterally in the CA1 subfield and in the left Brodmann area 35. Thickness analysis results are consistent with volumetry, but provide additional regional specificity and suggest nonuniformity in the effects of aMCI on hippocampal subfields and MTL cortical subregions. Hum Brain Mapp, 36:258–287, 2015.

1 August 2016
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
PYPaul Yushkevich
Paul Yushkevich
YGYang Gao
Yang Gao
GGGuido Gerig
Guido Gerig
Obtaining quantitative measures from biomedical images often requires segmentation, i.e., finding and outlining the structures of interest. Multi-modality imaging datasets, in which multiple imaging measures are available at each spatial location, are increasingly common, particularly in MRI. In applications where fully automatic segmentation algorithms are unavailable or fail to perform at desired levels of accuracy, semi-automatic segmentation can be a time-saving alternative to manual segmentation, allowing the human expert to guide segmentation, while minimizing the effort expended by the expert on repetitive tasks that can be automated. However, few existing 3D image analysis tools support semi-automatic segmentation of multi-modality imaging data. This paper describes new extensions to the ITK-SNAP interactive image visualization and segmentation tool that support semi-automatic segmentation of multi-modality imaging datasets in a way that utilizes information from all available modalities simultaneously. The approach combines Random Forest classifiers, trained by the user by placing several brushstrokes in the image, with the active contour segmentation algorithm. The new multi-modality semi-automatic segmentation approach is evaluated in the context of high-grade glioblastoma segmentation.