Brandon Edwards

Dr. Brandon Edwards


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2010 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SNS.L. Namikas
S.L. Namikas
BEBrandon Edwards
Brandon Edwards
MBM.C.A. Bitton
M.C.A. Bitton
JBJ.L. Booth
J.L. Booth
YZY. Zhu
Y. Zhu

20 March 2014 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDurelle Scott
Durelle Scott
RKRichard Keim
Richard Keim
BEBrandon Edwards
Brandon Edwards
CJC. Nathan Jones
C. Nathan Jones
DKDaniel E. Kroes
Daniel E. Kroes
The 2011 flood in the Lower Mississippi resulted in the second highest recorded river flow diverted into the Atchafalaya River Basin (ARB). The higher water levels during the flood peak resulted in high hydrologic connectivity between the Atchafalaya River and floodplain, with up to 50% of the Atchafalaya River water moving off channel. Water quality samples were collected throughout the ARB over the course of the flood event. Significant nitrate (NO3−) reduction (75%) occurred within the floodplain, resulting in a total NO3− reduction of 16.6% over the flood. The floodplain was a small but measurable source of dissolved reactive phosphorus and ammonium (NH4+). Collectively, these results from this large flood event suggest that enhancing river-floodplain connectivity through freshwater diversions will reduce NO3− loads to the Gulf of Mexico during large annual floods.

4 September 2014 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CJC. Nathan Jones
C. Nathan Jones
DSDurelle T. Scott
Durelle T. Scott
BEBrandon Edwards
Brandon Edwards
RKRichard Keim
Richard Keim
Inundation hydrology and associated processes control biogeochemical processing in floodplains. To better understand how hydrologic connectivity, residence time, and intrafloodplain mixing vary in floodplain wetlands, we examined how water quality of two contrasting areas in the floodplain of the Atchafalaya River—a flow‐through and a backwater wetland—responded to an annual flood pulse. Large, synoptic sampling campaigns occurred in both wetlands during the rising limb, peak, and falling limb of the hydrograph. Using a combination of conservative and reactive tracers, we inferred three dominant processes that occurred over the course of the flood pulse: flushing (rising limb), advective transport (peak), and organic matter accumulation (falling limb). Biogeochemistry of the two wetlands was similar during the peak while the river overflowed into both. However, during the rising and falling limbs, flow in the backwater wetland experienced much greater residence time. This led to the accumulation of dissolved organic matter and dissolved phosphorus. There were also elevated ratios of dissolved organic carbon to nitrate in the backwater wetland, suggesting nitrogen removal was limited by nitrate transported into the floodplain there. Collectively, our results suggest inclusion of a temporal component into the perirheic concept more fully describes inundation hydrology and biogeochemistry in large river floodplain.

3 June 2019 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NWNicholas Webb
Nicholas Webb
ACAdrian Chappell
Adrian Chappell
BEBrandon Edwards
Brandon Edwards
SMSarah E. McCord
Sarah E. McCord
JZJustin W. Van Zee
Justin W. Van Zee
DTDavid Toledo
David Toledo
Measurements of aeolian sediment transport support our understanding of mineral dust impacts on Earth and human systems and assessments of aeolian process sensitivities to global environmental change. However, sample design principles are often overlooked in aeolian research. Here we use high‐density field measurements of sediment mass flux across land use and land cover types to examine sample size and power effects on detecting change in aeolian transport. Temporal variances were 1.6 to 10.1 times the magnitude of spatial variances in aeolian transport for six study sites. Differences in transport were detectable for >67% of comparisons among sites using ~27 samples. Failure to detect change with smaller sample sizes suggests that aeolian transport measurements and monitoring are much more uncertain than recognized. We show how small and selective sampling, common in aeolian research, gives the false impression that differences in aeolian transport can be detected, potentially undermining inferences about process and impacting reproducibility of aeolian research.

12 June 2009 in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BEBrandon Edwards
Brandon Edwards
SNSteven L. Namikas
Steven L. Namikas

1 September 2016 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BEBrandon Edwards
Brandon Edwards
RKRichard Keim
Richard Keim
EJErin L. Johnson
Erin L. Johnson
CHCliff R. Hupp
Cliff R. Hupp
SMSaraline Marre
Saraline Marre
SKSammy L. King
Sammy L. King