Background/Objectives: Loneliness among older adults is a prevalent issue, significantly impacting their quality of life and increasing the risk of physical and mental health complications. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in behavioral interventions offers a promising avenue to overcome challenges in designing and implementing interventions to reduce loneliness by enabling personalized and scalable solutions. This study systematically reviews the AI-enabled interventions in addressing loneliness among older adults, focusing on the effectiveness and underlying technologies used. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across eight electronic databases, including PubMed and Web of Science, for studies published up to 31 January 2024. Inclusion criteria were experimental studies involving AI applications to mitigate loneliness among adults aged 55 and older. Data on participant demographics, intervention characteristics, AI methodologies, and effectiveness outcomes were extracted and synthesized. Results: Nine studies were included, comprising six randomized controlled trials and three pre–post designs. The most frequently implemented AI technologies included speech recognition (n = 6) and emotion recognition and simulation (n = 5). Intervention types varied, with six studies employing social robots, two utilizing personal voice assistants, and one using a digital human facilitator. Six studies reported significant reductions in loneliness, particularly those utilizing social robots, which demonstrated emotional engagement and personalized interactions. Three studies reported non-significant effects, often due to shorter intervention durations or limited interaction frequencies. Conclusions: AI-driven interventions show promise in reducing loneliness among older adults. Future research should focus on long-term, culturally competent solutions that integrate quantitative and qualitative findings to optimize intervention design and scalability.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has been accompanied by an “infodemic,” where the rapid spread of misinformation has exacerbated public health challenges. Traditional fact-checking methods, though effective, are time-consuming and resource-intensive, limiting their ability to combat misinformation at scale. Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 offer a more scalable solution, but their susceptibility to generating hallucinations—plausible yet incorrect information—compromises their reliability. Objective: This study aims to enhance the accuracy and reliability of COVID-19 fact-checking by integrating a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system with LLMs, specifically addressing the limitations of hallucination and context inaccuracy inherent in stand-alone LLMs. Methods: We constructed a context dataset comprising approximately 130,000 peer-reviewed papers related to COVID-19 from PubMed and Scopus. This dataset was integrated with GPT-4 to develop multiple RAG-enhanced models: the naïve RAG, Lord of the Retrievers (LOTR)–RAG, corrective RAG (CRAG), and self-RAG (SRAG). The RAG systems were designed to retrieve relevant external information, which was then embedded and indexed in a vector store for similarity searches. One real-world dataset and one synthesized dataset, each containing 500 claims, were used to evaluate the performance of these models. Each model’s accuracy, F1-score, precision, and sensitivity were compared to assess their effectiveness in reducing hallucination and improving fact-checking accuracy. Results: The baseline GPT-4 model achieved an accuracy of 0.856 on the real-world dataset. The naïve RAG model improved this to 0.946, while the LOTR-RAG model further increased accuracy to 0.951. The CRAG and SRAG models outperformed all others, achieving accuracies of 0.972 and 0.973, respectively. The baseline GPT-4 model reached an accuracy of 0.960 on the synthesized dataset. The naïve RAG model increased this to 0.972, and the LOTR-RAG, CRAG, and SRAG models achieved an accuracy of 0.978. These findings demonstrate that the RAG-enhanced models consistently maintained high accuracy levels, closely mirroring ground-truth labels and significantly reducing hallucinations. The CRAG and SRAG models also provided more detailed and contextually accurate explanations, further establishing the superiority of agentic RAG frameworks in delivering reliable and precise fact-checking outputs across diverse datasets. Conclusions: The integration of RAG systems with LLMs substantially improves the accuracy and contextual relevance of automated fact-checking. By reducing hallucinations and enhancing transparency by citing retrieved sources, this method holds significant promise for rapid, reliable information verification to combat misinformation during public health crises.

Using simulated patients to mimic 9 established noncommunicable and infectious diseases, we assessed ChatGPT’s performance in treatment recommendations for common diseases in low- and middle-income countries. ChatGPT had a high level of accuracy in both correct diagnoses (20/27, 74%) and medication prescriptions (22/27, 82%) but a concerning level of unnecessary or harmful medications (23/27, 85%) even with correct diagnoses. ChatGPT performed better in managing noncommunicable diseases than infectious ones. These results highlight the need for cautious AI integration in health care systems to ensure quality and safety.

Nuts are nutrient-dense foods and can be incorporated into a healthy diet. Artificial intelligence-powered diet-tracking apps may promote nut consumption by providing real-time, accurate nutrition information but depend on data and model availability. Our team developed a dataset comprising 1380 photographs, each in RGB color format and with a resolution of 4032 × 3024 pixels. These images feature 11 types of nuts that are commonly consumed. Each photo includes three nut types; each type consists of 2–4 nuts, so 6–9 nuts are in each image. Rectangular bounding boxes were drawn using a visual geometry group (VGG) image annotator to facilitate the identification of each nut, delineating their locations within the images. This approach renders the dataset an excellent resource for training models capable of multi-label classification and object detection, as it was meticulously divided into training, validation, and test subsets. Utilizing transfer learning in Python with the IceVision framework, deep neural network models were adeptly trained to recognize and pinpoint the nuts depicted in the photographs. The ultimate model exhibited a mean average precision of 0.7596 in identifying various nut types within the validation subset and demonstrated a 97.9% accuracy rate in determining the number and kinds of nuts present in the test subset. By integrating specific nutritional data for each type of nut, the model can precisely (with error margins ranging from 0.8 to 2.6%) calculate the combined nutritional content—encompassing total energy, proteins, carbohydrates, fats (total and saturated), fiber, vitamin E, and essential minerals like magnesium, phosphorus, copper, manganese, and selenium—of the nuts shown in a photograph. Both the dataset and the model have been made publicly available to foster data exchange and the spread of knowledge. Our research underscores the potential of leveraging photographs for automated nut calorie and nutritional content estimation, paving the way for the creation of dietary tracking applications that offer real-time, precise nutritional insights to encourage nut consumption.

Menu labeling regulations in the United States mandate chain restaurants to display calorie information for standard menu items, intending to facilitate healthy dietary choices and address obesity concerns. For this study, we utilized machine learning techniques to conduct a novel sentiment analysis of public opinions regarding menu labeling regulations, drawing on Twitter data from 2008 to 2022. Tweets were collected through a systematic search strategy and annotated as positive, negative, neutral, or news. Our temporal analysis revealed that tweeting peaked around major policy announcements, with a majority categorized as neutral or news-related. The prevalence of news tweets declined after 2017, as neutral views became more common over time. Deep neural network models like RoBERTa achieved strong performance (92% accuracy) in classifying sentiments. Key predictors of tweet sentiments identified by the random forest model included the author’s followers and tweeting activity. Despite limitations such as Twitter’s demographic biases, our analysis provides unique insights into the evolution of perceptions on the regulations since their inception, including the recent rise in negative sentiment. It underscores social media’s utility for continuously monitoring public attitudes to inform health policy development, execution, and refinement.