Jin-tung Liang

Prof. Jin-tung Liang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2017 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HWHarpreet S Wasan
Harpreet S Wasan
PGPeter Gibbs
Peter Gibbs
NSNavesh K Sharma
Navesh K Sharma
JTJulien Taieb
Julien Taieb
VHVolker Heinemann
Volker Heinemann
MWMark Westcott
Mark Westcott
Data suggest selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) in third-line or subsequent therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer has clinical benefit in patients with colorectal liver metastases with liver-dominant disease after chemotherapy. The FOXFIRE, SIRFLOX, and FOXFIRE-Global randomised studies evaluated the efficacy of combining first-line chemotherapy with SIRT using yttrium-90 resin microspheres in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with liver metastases. The studies were designed for combined analysis of overall survival. FOXFIRE, SIRFLOX, and FOXFIRE-Global were randomised, phase 3 trials done in hospitals and specialist liver centres in 14 countries worldwide (Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Portugal, South Korea, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, the UK, and the USA). Chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (WHO performance status 0 or 1) with liver metastases not suitable for curative resection or ablation were randomly assigned (1:1) to either oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX: leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) or FOLFOX plus single treatment SIRT concurrent with cycle 1 or 2 of chemotherapy. In FOXFIRE, FOLFOX chemotherapy was OxMdG (oxaliplatin modified de Gramont chemotherapy; 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin infusion over 2 h, L-leucovorin 175 mg or D,L-leucovorin 350 mg infusion over 2 h, and 400 mg/m2 bolus fluorouracil followed by a 2400 mg/m2 continuous fluorouracil infusion over 46 h). In SIRFLOX and FOXFIRE-Global, FOLFOX chemotherapy was modified FOLFOX6 (85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin infusion over 2 h, 200 mg leucovorin, and 400 mg/m2 bolus fluorouracil followed by a 2400 mg/m2 continuous fluorouracil infusion over 46 h). Randomisation was done by central minimisation with four factors: presence of extrahepatic metastases, tumour involvement of the liver, planned use of a biological agent, and investigational centre. Participants and investigators were not masked to treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population, using a two-stage meta-analysis of pooled individual patient data. All three trials have completed 2 years of follow-up. FOXFIRE is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN83867919. SIRFLOX and FOXFIRE-Global are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00724503 (SIRFLOX) and NCT01721954 (FOXFIRE-Global). Between Oct 11, 2006, and Dec 23, 2014, 549 patients were randomly assigned to FOLFOX alone and 554 patients were assigned FOLFOX plus SIRT. Median follow-up was 43·3 months (IQR 31·6-58·4). There were 411 (75%) deaths in 549 patients in the FOLFOX alone group and 433 (78%) deaths in 554 patients in the FOLFOX plus SIRT group. There was no difference in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1·04, 95% CI 0·90-1·19; p=0·61). The median survival time in the FOLFOX plus SIRT group was 22·6 months (95% CI 21·0-24·5) compared with 23·3 months (21·8-24·7) in the FOLFOX alone group. In the safety population containing patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, as treated, the most common grade 3-4 adverse event was neutropenia (137 [24%] of 571 patients receiving FOLFOX alone vs 186 (37%) of 507 patients receiving FOLFOX plus SIRT). Serious adverse events of any grade occurred in 244 (43%) of 571 patients receiving FOLFOX alone and 274 (54%) of 507 patients receiving FOLFOX plus SIRT. 10 patients in the FOLFOX plus SIRT group and 11 patients in the FOLFOX alone group died due to an adverse event; eight treatment-related deaths occurred in the FOLFOX plus SIRT group and three treatment-related deaths occurred in the FOLFOX alone group. Addition of SIRT to first-line FOLFOX chemotherapy for patients with liver-only and liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer did not improve overall survival compared with that for FOLFOX alone. Therefore, early use of SIRT in combination with chemotherapy in unselected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer cannot be recommended. To further define the role of SIRT in metastatic colorectal cancer, careful patient selection and studies investigating the role of SIRT as consolidation therapy after chemotherapy are needed. Bobby Moore Fund of Cancer Research UK, Sirtex Medical.

15 July 2012 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HCHsin-Yi Chen
Hsin-Yi Chen
YLYu-Min Lin
Yu-Min Lin
HCHsiang-Ching Chung
Hsiang-Ching Chung
YLYaw-Dong Lang
Yaw-Dong Lang
CLChing-Jung Lin
Ching-Jung Lin
RCRuey-hwa Chen
Ruey-hwa Chen
Metastasis is the major cause of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC), and increasing evidence supports the contribution of miRNAs to cancer progression. Here, we found that high expression of miR-103 and miR-107 (miR-103/107) was associated with metastasis potential of CRC cell lines and poor prognosis in patients with CRC. We showed that miR-103/107 targeted the known metastasis suppressors death-associated protein kinase (DAPK) and Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) in CRC cells, resulting in increased cell motility and cell–matrix adhesion and decreased cell–cell adhesion and epithelial marker expression. miR-103/107 expression was increased in the presence of hypoxia, thereby potentiating DAPK and KLF4 downregulation and hypoxia-induced motility and invasiveness. In mouse models of CRC, miR-103/107 overexpression potentiated local invasion and liver metastasis effects, which were suppressed by reexpression of DAPK or KLF4. miR-103/107–mediated downregulation of DAPK and KLF4 also enabled the colonization of CRC cells at a metastatic site. Clinically, the signature of a miR-103/107 high, DAPK low, and KLF4 low expression profile correlated with the extent of lymph node and distant metastasis in patients with CRC and served as a prognostic marker for metastasis recurrence and poor survival. Our findings therefore indicate that miR-103/107–mediated repression of DAPK and KLF4 promotes metastasis in CRC, and this regulatory circuit may contribute in part to hypoxia-stimulated tumor metastasis. Strategies that disrupt this regulation might be developed to block CRC metastasis. Cancer Res; 72(14); 3631–41. ©2012 AACR.

1 September 2017 in JAMA Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCCheryl Chia-Hui Chen
Cheryl Chia-Hui Chen
HLHsiu-Ching Li
Hsiu-Ching Li
JLJin-tung Liang
Jin-tung Liang
ILI-Rue Lai
I-Rue Lai
JPJerry Dwi Trijoyo Purnomo
Jerry Dwi Trijoyo Purnomo
SISharon K. Inouye
Sharon K. Inouye
Patients undergoing abdominal surgery often develop delirium, which greatly influences their postoperative course of clinical recovery and length of hospital stay (LOS).1-3 Delirium affects 13% to 50% of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery,4 and the health care costs attributable to delirium are more than $164 billion per year in the United States.5,6 Older surgical patients (≥65 years of age) have a particularly high risk for developing delirium, with detrimental effects on their recovery.6 Delirium has been associated with alterations in cholinergic activity, inflammatory processes induced by neural signaling, and excessive depth of anesthesia and sedation.7,8 Delirium may also be precipitated by factors such as infection, malnutrition, electrolyte and fluid imbalances, anemia, and social isolation.4,9,10 Nevertheless, 30% to 40% of cases of delirium are preventable11; thus, implementing effective interventions to prevent incident delirium and reduce LOS is a clinical priority.

28 January 2003 in British Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJin-tung Liang
Jin-tung Liang
Kuo-Chin HuangKuo-Chin Huang
Kuo-Chin Huang
LCLi-Tzong Chen
Li-Tzong Chen
YJY. M. Jeng
Y. M. Jeng
MWMing-Shiang Wu
Ming-Shiang Wu
SWS. M. Wang
S. M. Wang

14 November 2006 in Annals of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMing-Shian Tsai
Ming-Shian Tsai
YSYen-Hao Su
Yen-Hao Su
MHMing-Chih Ho
Ming-Chih Ho
JLJin-tung Liang
Jin-tung Liang
TCTzu-Ping Chen
Tzu-Ping Chen
PLPo-Huang Lee
Po-Huang Lee

1 March 2017 in Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PCPo-Da Chen
Po-Da Chen
CWChao-Yin Wu
Chao-Yin Wu
RHRey-Heng Hu
Rey-Heng Hu
CCChiung-Nien Chen
Chiung-Nien Chen
RYRay-Hwang Yuan
Ray-Hwang Yuan
YWYao-Ming Wu
Yao-Ming Wu