1. Introduction Plants exhibit a remarkable capacity to regenerate tissue, organs, or entirely new individuals after wounding or under in vitro conditions (Eshed Williams, 2021; Doll and Ikeuchi, 2025). Plant regeneration in vitro involves a biphasic process encompassing the acquisition of cell pluripotency and subsequent de novo shoots regeneration (DNSR) or de novo root regeneration (DNRR) (Figure 1A; Kim and Seo, 2025; Youngstrom et al., 2025). Initially, explants are cultured on an auxin-enriched callus-inducing medium (CIM) to induce the formation of a pluripotent callus. The pluripotent callus then undergoes extensive cellular reprogramming and spatial cell identities reorganization to generate shoots or roots (Figure 1A). Accumulating evidence indicates the vital involvement of phytohormones such as auxin, jasmonic acid (JA), cytokinin (CK), ethylene in regulating plant regeneration (García-Gómez, and Tusscher, 2024; Asghar et al., 2025; Xu and Yang, 2025). In addition, a couple of key transcription factors (TFs) such as WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX (WOX), PLETHORAs (PLTs) have been reported to play a key role in plant regeneration (Islam et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2024). Although this regenerative capability has been well-documented across numerous plant species, the underlying mechanisms remain largely elusive (Eshed Williams, 2021; Chen et al., 2024). Small signaling peptides represent a novel class of plant growth regulators, typically comprising fewer than 150 amino acids. These peptides are recognized by plasma membrane-localized receptors or co-receptors, which subsequently activate or deactivate specific regulatory pathways to modulate plant growth and stress adaptions (Ji et al., 2025; Xiao et al., 2025). Notably, several small signaling peptide-encoding genes, including CLAVATA3/EMBRYO SURROUNDING REGION-RELATED (CLE), C-TERMINALLY ENCODED PEP TIDE (CEP), phytosulfokine (PSK), and GOLVEN/ROOT MERISTEM GROWTH FACTOR/CLE-LIKE (GLV/RGF/CLEL) are differentially activated at specific stages of DNSR, as revealed by single-cell transcriptomic analysis, suggesting their potential roles in the plant shoot regeneration process (Zhai and Xu, 2021; Wang et al., 2022). Experimental data further demonstrate the regulatory functions of CLE1-CLE7 (Kang et al., 2022), CLE9/10 (Glazunova et al., 2025) and CLE46 (Ito et al., 2025), REGENERATION FACTOR1 (REF1) (Yang et al., 2024) and RAPID ALKALINIZATION FACTOR 33 (RALF33) peptides (Shen et al., 2025) in modulating plant regeneration capacity under in vitro conditions or in response to wounding signal as well as PSK peptides in the regulation of somatic embryogenesis (SE) (Hao et al., 2023; Luo et al., 2024) (Table 1; Figure 1B - E). 2. CLE-CLV1/BAM1 signaling module negatively regulates adventitious shoot regeneration The CLE genes encode precursor proteins featuring an N-terminal signal sequence that targets them to the secretory pathway, a central variable region, and a highly conserved CLE domain at the C-terminus, which frequently undergoes posttranslational modifications to produce a functional polypeptide (Xie et al., 2022; Ji et al., 2025). Consistent with their pivotal functions in stem cell regulation (Selby and Jones, 2023; Shpak and Uzair, 2025), the expressions of CLE members are differentially activated at distinct phases of shoot regeneration (Zhai and Xu, 2021; Wang et al., 2022). Specifically, CLE1-CLE7 and CLE9/10 peptides have been demonstrated to negatively influence shoot regeneration (Figure 1B; Kang et al., 2022; Glazunova et al., 2025). CLE1-CLE7 gene expression is significantly induced by CIM or shoot-inducing medium (SIM), and CRISPR-engineered cle1-7 septuple mutant exhibits an increased number of adventitious shoots (Kang et al., 2022). While most single cle mutants do not affect DNSR, the cle4 and cle7 mutants show enhanced DNSR (Kang et al., 2022). Conversely, application of synthetic CLE1-7 peptides exhibits a dose-dependent inhibition of DNSR, and overexpression of CLE4 or CLE7 also suppresses DNSR. In addition, CLE9/10 peptide also suppresses DNSR without affecting callus formation (Figure 1B; Glazunova et al., 2025). Notably, the clv1 and bam1 mutants show increased shoot regeneration capabilities and are insensitive to CLE1-CLE7 peptide-mediated inhibition of shoot regeneration, confirming that CLAVATA1 (CLV1) CLV1 and BARELY ANY MERISTEM1 (BAM1) receptors mediate the CLE1-CLE7 signal to negatively regulate DNSR. However, clv1 mutant respond normally to CLE9/10 peptide treatment, while bam1 mutant is insensitive to CLE9/10 peptide (Glazunova et al., 2025). Further studies reveal that the CLE-CLV1/BAM1 module restricts the transcriptional level of WUSCHEL (WUS), a critical regulator of plant regeneration (Ince and Sugimoto, 2023; Shpak and Uzair, 2025), thereby controlling shoot regeneration potential (Figure 1B). 3. REF1-PORK1 pathway promotes regeneration through activating WIND1 expression Recent studies have identified REF1, a Pep peptide homolog in tomato, as a crucial regulator of plant regenerative capacity (Figure 1C; Yang et al., 2024). The absence of PRP, the precursor of REF1 peptide, results in impaired callus formation and shoot regeneration, while PRP overexpression markedly enhances regenerative capacity (Yang et al., 2024). The exogenous application of synthetic REF1 peptide also enhances callus formation and shoot regeneration in wild-type (WT) plants in a dose-responsive manner, and compensates for the regenerative deficits observed in prp mutants. These findings collectively underscore the key role of REF1 peptide in regulating plant regeneration (Yang et al., 2024). Additionally, mutation in PEPR1/2 ORTHOLOG RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE 1 (PORK1) result in similar defects in callus formation and shoot regeneration that are observed in prp mutants. While PORK1 overexpression significantly boosts regenerative capacity. Additionally, pork1 mutant exhibits insensitivity to REF1 peptide...