Anastasia Agdzhoyan

Dr. Anastasia Agdzhoyan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 April 2019 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CJChoongwon Jeong
Choongwon Jeong
OBOleg Balanovsky
Oleg Balanovsky
ELElena Lukianova
Elena Lukianova
NKNurzhibek Kahbatkyzy
Nurzhibek Kahbatkyzy
PFPavel Flegontov
Pavel Flegontov
JKJohannes Krause
Johannes Krause
The indigenous populations of inner Eurasia—a huge geographic region covering the central Eurasian steppe and the northern Eurasian taiga and tundra—harbour tremendous diversity in their genes, cultures and languages. In this study, we report novel genome-wide data for 763 individuals from Armenia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Mongolia, Russia, Tajikistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan. We furthermore report additional damage-reduced genome-wide data of two previously published individuals from the Eneolithic Botai culture in Kazakhstan (~5,400 bp). We find that present-day inner Eurasian populations are structured into three distinct admixture clines stretching between various western and eastern Eurasian ancestries, mirroring geography. The Botai and more recent ancient genomes from Siberia show a decrease in contributions from so-called ‘ancient North Eurasian’ ancestry over time, which is detectable only in the northern-most ‘forest-tundra’ cline. The intermediate ‘steppe-forest’ cline descends from the Late Bronze Age steppe ancestries, while the ‘southern steppe’ cline further to the south shows a strong West/South Asian influence. Ancient genomes suggest a northward spread of the southern steppe cline in Central Asia during the first millennium bc. Finally, the genetic structure of Caucasus populations highlights a role of the Caucasus Mountains as a barrier to gene flow and suggests a post-Neolithic gene flow into North Caucasus populations from the steppe.

1 July 2016 in The American Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AIAnne-Mai Ilumäe
Anne-Mai Ilumäe
MRMaere Reidla
Maere Reidla
MCMarina Chukhryaeva
Marina Chukhryaeva
MJMari Järve
Mari Järve
HPHelen Post
Helen Post
SRSiiri Rootsi
Siiri Rootsi

2 September 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAlena Kushniarevich
Alena Kushniarevich
OUOlga Utevska
Olga Utevska
MCMarina Chuhryaeva
Marina Chuhryaeva
AAAnastasia Agdzhoyan
Anastasia Agdzhoyan
KDKhadizhat Dibirova
Khadizhat Dibirova
OBOleg Balanovsky
Oleg Balanovsky
The Slavic branch of the Balto-Slavic sub-family of Indo-European languages underwent rapid divergence as a result of the spatial expansion of its speakers from Central-East Europe, in early medieval times. This expansion–mainly to East Europe and the northern Balkans–resulted in the incorporation of genetic components from numerous autochthonous populations into the Slavic gene pools. Here, we characterize genetic variation in all extant ethnic groups speaking Balto-Slavic languages by analyzing mitochondrial DNA (n = 6,876), Y-chromosomes (n = 6,079) and genome-wide SNP profiles (n = 296), within the context of other European populations. We also reassess the phylogeny of Slavic languages within the Balto-Slavic branch of Indo-European. We find that genetic distances among Balto-Slavic populations, based on autosomal and Y-chromosomal loci, show a high correlation (0.9) both with each other and with geography, but a slightly lower correlation (0.7) with mitochondrial DNA and linguistic affiliation. The data suggest that genetic diversity of the present-day Slavs was predominantly shaped in situ, and we detect two different substrata: ‘central-east European’ for West and East Slavs, and ‘south-east European’ for South Slavs. A pattern of distribution of segments identical by descent between groups of East-West and South Slavs suggests shared ancestry or a modest gene flow between those two groups, which might derive from the historic spread of Slavic people.

7 April 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OBOleg Balanovsky
Oleg Balanovsky
MZMaxat Zhabagin
Maxat Zhabagin
AAAnastasia Agdzhoyan
Anastasia Agdzhoyan
MCMarina Chukhryaeva
Marina Chukhryaeva
VZValery Zaporozhchenko
Valery Zaporozhchenko
EBElena Balanovska
Elena Balanovska
Y-chromosomal haplogroup G1 is a minor component of the overall gene pool of South-West and Central Asia but reaches up to 80% frequency in some populations scattered within this area. We have genotyped the G1-defining marker M285 in 27 Eurasian populations (n= 5,346), analyzed 367 M285-positive samples using 17 Y-STRs, and sequenced ~11 Mb of the Y-chromosome in 20 of these samples to an average coverage of 67X. This allowed detailed phylogenetic reconstruction. We identified five branches, all with high geographical specificity: G1-L1323 in Kazakhs, the closely related G1-GG1 in Mongols, G1-GG265 in Armenians and its distant brother clade G1-GG162 in Bashkirs, and G1-GG362 in West Indians. The haplotype diversity, which decreased from West Iran to Central Asia, allows us to hypothesize that this rare haplogroup could have been carried by the expansion of Iranic speakers northwards to the Eurasian steppe and via founder effects became a predominant genetic component of some populations, including the Argyn tribe of the Kazakhs. The remarkable agreement between genetic and genealogical trees of Argyns allowed us to calibrate the molecular clock using a historical date (1405 AD) of the most recent common genealogical ancestor. The mutation rate for Y-chromosomal sequence data obtained was 0.78×10-9 per bp per year, falling within the range of published rates. The mutation rate for Y-chromosomal STRs was 0.0022 per locus per generation, very close to the so-called genealogical rate. The “clan-based” approach to estimating the mutation rate provides a third, middle way between direct farther-to-son comparisons and using archeologically known migrations, whose dates are subject to revision and of uncertain relationship to genetic events.

28 December 2016 in Russian Journal of Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EBE. V. Balanovska
E. V. Balanovska
MZMaxat Zhabagin
Maxat Zhabagin
AAAnastasia Agdzhoyan
Anastasia Agdzhoyan
MCM. I. Chukhryaeva
M. I. Chukhryaeva
NMN. V. Markina
N. V. Markina
OBO. P. Balanovsky
O. P. Balanovsky
Population biobanks are collections of thoroughly annotated biological material stored for many years. Population biobanks are a valuable resource for both basic science and applied research and are...

8 June 2017 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MZMaxat Zhabagin
Maxat Zhabagin
EBElena Balanovska
Elena Balanovska
ZSZhaxylyk Sabitov
Zhaxylyk Sabitov
MKMarina Kuznetsova
Marina Kuznetsova
AAAnastasia Agdzhoyan
Anastasia Agdzhoyan
OBOleg Balanovsky
Oleg Balanovsky
We have analyzed Y-chromosomal variation in populations from Transoxiana, a historical region covering the southwestern part of Central Asia. We studied 780 samples from 10 regional populations of Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Turkmens, Dungans, and Karakalpaks using 35 SNP and 17 STR markers. Analysis of haplogroup frequencies using multidimensional scaling and principal component plots, supported by an analysis of molecular variance, showed that the geographic landscape of Transoxiana, despite its distinctiveness and diversity (deserts, fertile river basins, foothills and plains) had no strong influence on the genetic landscape. The main factor structuring the gene pool was the mode of subsistence: settled agriculture or nomadic pastoralism. Investigation of STR-based clusters of haplotypes and their ages revealed that cultural and demic expansions of Transoxiana were not closely connected with each other. The Arab cultural expansion introduced Islam to the region but did not leave a significant mark on the pool of paternal lineages. The Mongol expansion, in contrast, had enormous demic success, but did not impact cultural elements like language and religion. The genealogy of Muslim missionaries within the settled agricultural communities of Transoxiana was based on spiritual succession passed from teacher to disciple. However, among Transoxianan nomads, spiritual and biological succession became merged.