Background: Genetic and epigenetic changes, oxidative stress and inflammation influence the rate of aging, which diseases, lifestyle and environmental factors can further accelerate. In accelerated aging (AA), the biological age exceeds the chronological age. Objective: The objective of this study is to reappraise the AA concept critically, considering its weaknesses and limitations. Methods: We reviewed more than 300 recent articles dealing with the physiology of brain aging and neurodegeneration pathophysiology. Results: (1) Application of the AA concept to individual organs outside the brain is challenging as organs of different systems age at different rates. (2) There is a need to consider the deceleration of aging due to the potential use of the individual structure–functional reserves. The latter can be restored by pharmacological and/or cognitive therapy, environment, etc. (3) The AA concept lacks both standardised terminology and methodology. (4) Changes in specific molecular biomarkers (MBM) reflect aging-related processes; however, numerous MBM candidates should be validated to consolidate the AA theory. (5) The exact nature of many potential causal factors, biological outcomes and interactions between the former and the latter remain largely unclear. Conclusions: Although AA is commonly recognised as a perspective theory, it still suffers from a number of gaps and limitations that assume the necessity for an updated AA concept.

Background: Aging rate is affected by genetic changes, epigenetic modifications, oxidative stress, inflammation, lifestyle and environmental factors. In accelerated aging (AA), biological age exceeds the chronological one. Objective: To undertake a critical reappraisal of the AA concept and to reveal its weaknesses and limitations. Methods: We reviewed over 300 recent articles dealing with physiology of brain aging and pathophysiology of neurodegeneration. Results: (1) Organ systems age at different rates, which interferes with application of the AA concept to individual organs. (2) Aging rate can be decelerated due to individual structure–functional reserves built with cognitive, physical training or pharmacological interventions. (3) The AA concept lacks standardised terminology and methodology. (4) Specific molecular biomarkers (MBM) reflect aging. To consolidate the AA theory, researchers should validate numerous MBM candidates. (5) Aging factors, mechanisms and the exact nature of their biological outcomes are not well understood. Conclusion: Although considered as a perspective theory, the AA concept has serious limitations and it requires an update.