Acute pyelonephritis (APN) is a relatively common community-acquired infection, particularly in women. The early appropriate antibiotic treatment of this potentially life-threatening infection is associated with improved outcomes. The international management guidelines for complicated urinary tract infections and APN recommend using oral antibiotics with <10% resistance among urinary pathogens. However, increasing antibiotic resistance rates among Escherichia coli and other Enterobacterales to fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and beta-lactams has left patients without reliable oral antibiotic treatment options for APN. This narrative review proposes using precision medicine concepts to improve empirical antibiotic therapy for APN in ambulatory settings. Whereas resistance rates to a particular antibiotic class may exceed 10% at the population-based level, the predicted antibiotic resistance rates based on patient-specific risk factors fall under 10% in many patients with APN on the individual level. The utilization of clinical tools for the prediction of fluoroquinolones, TMP-SMX, and third-generation cephalosporin resistance improves the ambulatory antibiotic management of APN. It may also reduce the need to switch antibiotic therapy later based on the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing results of bacterial isolates in urinary cultures. This approach may mitigate the burden of increasing antibiotic resistance in the community by ensuring that the initial antibiotic prescribed has the highest likelihood of treating APN appropriately.

In 2021, the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), the Infectious Diseases Society of America in conjunction with the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (IDSA/SHEA), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) published updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of Clostridioides difficile infections. The differences, sometimes subtle, between these guideline recommendations have caused some debate among clinicians. This paper delves into select key recommendations from each respective CPG and analyzes the differences and evidence associated with each. One primary difference between the CPGs is the preference given to fidaxomicin over vancomycin for initial treatment in non-severe and severe disease endorsed by IDSA/SHEA and ESCMID guidelines, while the ACG-sponsored CPGs do not offer a preference. The emphasis on cost effective data was also a noticeable difference between the CPGs and thus interpretation of the available evidence. When using guidelines to help support local practice or institutional treatment pathways, clinicians should carefully balance CPG recommendations with local patient populations and feasibility of implementation, especially when multiple guidelines for the same disease state exist.

Well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated safe and effective use of oral antimicrobial therapy for bone and joint infections. Application of data for implementation into real-world practice, however, has inherent challenges. This retrospective cohort study compared real-world use of intravenous versus oral antimicrobial therapy in bone and joint infections within a large healthcare system comprising both academic and community medical centers. The primary outcome was the proportion of treatment failure. Key secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with logistical failure and risk factors associated with treatment and logistical failure. Among 166 patients included, 136 (82%) and 30 (18%) received predominantly intravenous and oral antimicrobial therapy, respectively. Treatment failure occurred in (77/121) 64% versus (18/25) 72% of patients in the intravenous and oral antimicrobial groups (p = 0.491; OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.56–3.33). Logistical failure occurred in 29% versus 47% of patients in the intravenous and oral antimicrobial groups (p = 0.150; OR, 1.93; 95% CI 0.79–4.70). Risk factors for treatment failure included peripheral vascular disease (OR, 2.61; 95% CI 1.02–7.80) and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (OR, 1.18; 95% CI 1.04–1.36). Similar to previously published RCTs, treatment failure appeared comparable between groups; however, oral antimicrobial therapy was overall underutilized.