Despite the success of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines, there remains a need for more prevention and treatment options for individuals remaining at risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the viral spike protein have potential to both prevent and treat COVID-19 and reduce the risk of severe disease and death. Here, we describe AZD7442, a combination of two mAbs, AZD8895 (tixagevimab) and AZD1061 (cilgavimab), that simultaneously bind to distinct, nonoverlapping epitopes on the spike protein receptor binding domain to neutralize SARS-CoV-2. Initially isolated from individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, the two mAbs were designed to extend their half-lives and reduce effector functions. The AZD7442 mAbs individually prevent the spike protein from binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor, blocking virus cell entry, and neutralize all tested SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. In a nonhuman primate model of SARS-CoV-2 infection, prophylactic AZD7442 administration prevented infection, whereas therapeutic administration accelerated virus clearance from the lung. In an ongoing phase 1 study in healthy participants (NCT04507256), a 300-mg intramuscular injection of AZD7442 provided SARS-CoV-2 serum geometric mean neutralizing titers greater than 10-fold above those of convalescent serum for at least 3 months, which remained threefold above those of convalescent serum at 9 months after AZD7442 administration. About 1 to 2% of serum AZD7442 was detected in nasal mucosa, a site of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Extrapolation of the time course of serum AZD7442 concentration suggests AZD7442 may provide up to 12 months of protection and benefit individuals at high-risk of COVID-19.

MEDI4276 is a biparatopic tetravalent antibody targeting two nonoverlapping epitopes in subdomains 2 and 4 of the HER2 ecto-domain, with site-specific conjugation to a tubulysin-based microtubule inhibitor payload. MEDI4276 demonstrates enhanced cellular internalization and cytolysis of HER2-positive tumor cells in vitro. This was a first-in-human, dose-escalation clinical trial in patients with HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer or gastric cancer. MEDI4276 doses escalated from 0.05 to 0.9 mg/kg (60- to 90-minute intravenous infusion every 3 weeks). Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints included antitumor activity (objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival), pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Forty-seven patients (median age 59 years; median of seven prior treatment regimens) were treated. The maximum tolerated dose was exceeded at 0.9 mg/kg with two patients experiencing dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of grade 3 liver function test (LFT) increases, one of whom also had grade 3 diarrhea, which resolved. Two additional patients reported DLTs of grade 3 LFT increases at lower doses (0.4 and 0.6 mg/kg). The most common (all grade) drug-related adverse events (AEs) were nausea (59.6%), fatigue (44.7%), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased (42.6%), and vomiting (38.3%). The most common grade 3/4 drug-related AE was AST increased (21.3%). Five patients had drug-related AEs leading to treatment discontinuation. In the as-treated population, there was one complete response (0.5 mg/kg; breast cancer), and two partial responses (0.6 and 0.75 mg/kg; breast cancer)—all had prior trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). MEDI4276 has demonstrable clinical activity but displays intolerable toxicity at doses >0.3 mg/kg.

Purpose: We evaluated the activity of AZD8205, a B7-H4–directed antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) bearing a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor (TOP1i) payload, alone and in combination with the PARP1-selective inhibitor AZD5305, in preclinical models. Experimental Design: IHC and deep-learning–based image analysis algorithms were used to assess prevalence and intratumoral heterogeneity of B7-H4 expression in human tumors. Several TOP1i-ADCs, prepared with Val-Ala or Gly–Gly–Phe–Gly peptide linkers, with or without a PEG8 spacer, were compared in biophysical, in vivo efficacy, and rat toxicology studies. AZD8205 mechanism of action and efficacy studies were conducted in human cancer cell line and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Results: Evaluation of IHC-staining density on a per-cell basis revealed a range of heterogeneous B7-H4 expression across patient tumors. This informed selection of bystander-capable Val-Ala–PEG8–TOP1i payload AZ14170133 and development of AZD8205, which demonstrated improved stability, efficacy, and safety compared with other linker–payload ADCs. In a study of 26 PDX tumors, single administration of 3.5 mg/kg AZD8205 provided a 69% overall response rate, according to modified RECIST criteria, which correlated with homologous recombination repair (HRR) deficiency (HRD) and elevated levels of B7-H4 in HRR-proficient models. Addition of AZD5305 sensitized very low B7-H4–expressing tumors to AZD8205 treatment, independent of HRD status and in models representing clinically relevant mechanisms of PARPi resistance. Conclusions: These data provide evidence for the potential utility of AZD8205 for treatment of B7-H4–expressing tumors and support the rationale for an ongoing phase 1 clinical study (NCT05123482). See related commentary by Pommier and Thomas, p. 991

Purpose: MEDI3726 is an antibody–drug conjugate targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen and carrying a pyrrolobenzodiazepine warhead. This phase I study evaluated MEDI3726 monotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after disease progression on abiraterone and/or enzalutamide and taxane-based chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: MEDI3726 was administered at 0.015–0.3 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to assess safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and MTD/maximum administered dose (MAD). Secondary objectives included assessment of antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. The main efficacy endpoint was composite response, defined as confirmed response by RECIST v1.1, and/or PSA decrease of ≥50% after ≥12 weeks, and/or decrease from ≥5 to <5 circulating tumor cells/7.5 mL blood. Results: Between February 1, 2017 and November 13, 2019, 33 patients received MEDI3726. By the data cutoff (January 17, 2020), treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 30 patients (90.9%), primarily skin toxicities and effusions. Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 15 patients (45.5%). Eleven patients (33.3%) discontinued because of TRAEs. There were no treatment-related deaths. One patient receiving 0.3 mg/kg had a DLT of grade 3 thrombocytopenia. The MTD was not identified; the MAD was 0.3 mg/kg. The composite response rate was 4/33 (12.1%). MEDI3726 had nonlinear pharmacokinetics with a short half-life (0.3–1.8 days). The prevalence of antidrug antibodies was 3/32 (9.4%), and the incidence was 13/32 (40.6%). Conclusions: Following dose escalation, no MTD was identified. Clinical responses occurred at higher doses, but were not durable as patients had to discontinue treatment due to TRAEs.

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) pose challenges to bioanalysis because of their inherently intricate structures and potential for very complex catabolism. Common bioanalysis strategy is to measure the concentration of ADCs and Total Antibody (Ab) as well as deconjugated warhead in circulation. The ADCs and the Total Ab can be quantified with ligand binding assays (LBA) or with hybrid immunocapture–liquid chromatography coupled with multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (LBA-LC-MRM). With the LBA-LC-MRM approach, a surrogate analyte, often the signature peptide, and released warhead can be used for the quantification of the Total Ab and ADCs, respectively. Recent advances in analytical instrumentation, especially the development of high resolution mass spectrometers (HRMS), have enabled characterization and quantification of intact macromolecules such as ADCs. The LBA-LC-HRMS approach employs immunocapture, followed by chromatographic separation at the macromolecule level and detection of the intact analyte. We developed an intact quantification method with 1–10 μg/mL linear dynamic range using 25 μL of plasma sample volume. This method was qualified for the measurement of naked monoclonal antibody (mAb), a site-specific cysteine-conjugated ADC with drug to antibody ratio ∼2 (DAR2) and a site-nonspecific cysteine-conjugated ADC (DAR8) in rat plasma. Samples from a rat pharmacokinetic (PK) study were analyzed with both methods. For the naked mAb, the results from both assays matched well. For ADCs, new species were observed from the LBA-HRMS method. The results demonstrated that potential biotransformation of the ADC was unveiled using the intact quantification approach while not being observed with traditional LBA-LC-MRM approach. Our work demonstrated an application of novel intact quantification by supporting animal PK studies. Moreover, our results suggest that the intact quantification method can provide novel perspectives on ADC in vivo characterization and quantification, which can benefit future drug candidate optimization as well as the immunogenicity impact evaluation and safety assessment.

In recent years, an increase in the discovery and development of biotherapeutics employing new modalities, such as bioconjugates or novel routes of delivery, has created bioanalytical challenges. The inherent complexity of conjugated molecular structures means that quantification of the bioconjugate and its multiple components is critical for preclinical/clinical studies to inform drug discovery and development. Moreover, bioconjugates involve additional multifactorial complexity because of the potential for in vivo catabolism and biotransformation, which may require thorough investigations in multiple biological matrices. Furthermore, excipients that enhance absorption are frequently evaluated and employed for the development of oral and inhaled biotherapeutics. Risk-benefit assessments are required for novel or existing excipients that utilize dosages above previously approved levels. Bioanalytical methods that can measure both excipients and potential drug metabolites in biological matrices are highly relevant to these emerging bioanalysis challenges. We discuss the bioanalytical strategies for analyzing bioconjugates such as antibody–drug conjugates and antibody–oligonucleotide conjugates and review recent advances in bioanalytical methods for the quantification and characterization of novel bioconjugates. We also discuss bioanalytical considerations for both biotherapeutics and excipients through novel administration routes and review analyses in various biological matrices, from the extensively studied serum or plasma to tissue biopsy in the context of preclinical and clinical studies from both technical and regulatory perspectives.