Constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs) are challenging because of the difficulty in handling both multiple objectives and constraints. While some evolutionary algorithms have demonstrated high performance on most CMOPs, they exhibit bad convergence or diversity performance on CMOPs with small feasible regions. To remedy this issue, this paper proposes a coevolutionary framework for constrained multi-objective optimization, which solves a complex CMOP assisted by a simple helper problem. The proposed framework evolves one population to solve the original CMOP and evolves another population to solve a helper problem derived from the original one. While the two populations are evolved by the same optimizer separately, the assistance in solving the original CMOP is achieved by sharing useful information between the two populations. In the experiments, the proposed framework is compared to several state-of-the-art algorithms tailored for CMOPs. High competitiveness of the proposed framework is demonstrated by applying it to 47 benchmark CMOPs and the vehicle routing problem with time windows.

In the real world, it is not uncommon to face an optimization problem with more than three objectives. Such problems, called many-objective optimization problems (MaOPs), pose great challenges to the area of evolutionary computation. The failure of conventional Pareto-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithms in dealing with MaOPs motivates various new approaches. However, in contrast to the rapid development of algorithm design, performance investigation and comparison of algorithms have received little attention. Several test problem suites which were designed for multi-objective optimization have still been dominantly used in many-objective optimization. In this paper, we carefully select (or modify) 15 test problems with diverse properties to construct a benchmark test suite, aiming to promote the research of evolutionary many-objective optimization (EMaO) via suggesting a set of test problems with a good representation of various real-world scenarios. Also, an open-source software platform with a user-friendly GUI is provided to facilitate the experimental execution and data observation.

There exist many multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) containing a large number of decision variables in real-world applications, which are known as large-scale MOPs. Due to the ineffectiveness of existing operators in finding optimal solutions in a huge decision space, some decision variable division-based algorithms have been tailored for improving the search efficiency in solving large-scale MOPs. However, these algorithms will encounter difficulties when solving problems with complicated landscapes, as the decision variable division is likely to be inaccurate and time consuming. In this paper, we propose a competitive swarm optimizer (CSO)-based efficient search for solving large-scale MOPs. The proposed algorithm adopts a new particle updating strategy that suggests a two-stage strategy to update position, which can highly improve the search efficiency. The experimental results on large-scale benchmark MOPs and an application example demonstrate the superiority of the proposed algorithm over several state-of-the-art multiobjective evolutionary algorithms, including problem transformation-based algorithm, decision variable clustering-based algorithm, particle swarm optimization algorithm, and estimation of distribution algorithm.

In the last two decades, a variety of different types of multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs) have been extensively investigated in the evolutionary computation community. However, most existing evolutionary algorithms encounter difficulties in dealing with MOPs whose Pareto optimal solutions are sparse (i.e., most decision variables of the optimal solutions are zero), especially when the number of decision variables is large. Such large-scale sparse MOPs exist in a wide range of applications, for example, feature selection that aims to find a small subset of features from a large number of candidate features, or structure optimization of neural networks whose connections are sparse to alleviate overfitting. This paper proposes an evolutionary algorithm for solving large-scale sparse MOPs. The proposed algorithm suggests a new population initialization strategy and genetic operators by taking the sparse nature of the Pareto optimal solutions into consideration, to ensure the sparsity of the generated solutions. Moreover, this paper also designs a test suite to assess the performance of the proposed algorithm for large-scale sparse MOPs. Experimental results on the proposed test suite and four application examples demonstrate the superiority of the proposed algorithm over seven existing algorithms in solving large-scale sparse MOPs.

Both objective optimization and constraint satisfaction are crucial for solving constrained multiobjective optimization problems, but the existing evolutionary algorithms encounter difficulties in striking a good balance between them when tackling complex feasible regions. To address this issue, this article proposes a two-stage evolutionary algorithm, which adjusts the fitness evaluation strategies during the evolutionary process to adaptively balance objective optimization and constraint satisfaction. The proposed algorithm can switch between the two stages according to the status of the current population, enabling the population to cross the infeasible region and reach the feasible regions in one stage, and to spread along the feasible boundaries in the other stage. Experimental studies on four benchmark suites and three real-world applications demonstrate the superiority of the proposed algorithm over the state-of-the-art algorithms, especially on problems with complex feasible regions.

Due to the curse of dimensionality of search space, it is extremely difficult for evolutionary algorithms to approximate the optimal solutions of large-scale multiobjective optimization problems (LMOPs) by using a limited budget of evaluations. If the Pareto-optimal subspace is approximated during the evolutionary process, the search space can be reduced and the difficulty encountered by evolutionary algorithms can be highly alleviated. Following the above idea, this article proposes an evolutionary algorithm to solve sparse LMOPs by learning the Pareto-optimal subspace. The proposed algorithm uses two unsupervised neural networks, a restricted Boltzmann machine, and a denoising autoencoder to learn a sparse distribution and a compact representation of the decision variables, where the combination of the learnt sparse distribution and compact representation is regarded as an approximation of the Pareto-optimal subspace. The genetic operators are conducted in the learnt subspace, and the resultant offspring solutions then can be mapped back to the original search space by the two neural networks. According to the experimental results on eight benchmark problems and eight real-world problems, the proposed algorithm can effectively solve sparse LMOPs with 10,000 decision variables by only 100,000 evaluations.