Obesity, a global health concern of increasing significance, is characterized by chronic low-grade inflammation (LGCI) that significantly contributes to metabolic dysfunction. This narrative review explores the intricate pathophysiological mechanisms driving LGCI in obesity, emphasizing the role of adipose tissue, immune cell activation, and inflammatory signaling pathways. Hypertrophic adipocytes and infiltrating immune cells, particularly macrophages, release a cascade of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β, creating a self-perpetuating cycle of inflammation. These mediators disrupt insulin signaling through JNK and NF-κB pathway activation, leading to systemic insulin resistance, cardiovascular complications, gut dysbiosis and other metabolic disorders. The review further discusses therapeutic strategies to mitigate obesity-related LGCI, focusing on lifestyle interventions, nutritional approaches, and pharmacological agents. Physical activity, specific nutrients, and dietary patterns can modulate inflammatory responses, while anti-obesogenic medicines and bariatric procedures offer additional avenues for intervention. By understanding and addressing the root causes of inflammation in obesity, healthcare professionals can develop targeted strategies to improve metabolic health and overall well-being of individuals with obesity and, ultimately, prevent and manage the wide-ranging complications associated with this condition.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disorder caused by homozygous deletions or mutations in the SMN1 gene, leading to progressive motor neuron degeneration. While SMA has been classically viewed as a motor neuron-autonomous disease, increasing evidence indicates a significant role of glial cells—astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes, and Schwann cells—in the disease pathophysiology. Astrocytic dysfunction contributes to motor neuron vulnerability through impaired calcium homeostasis, disrupted synaptic integrity, and neurotrophic factor deficits. Microglia, through reactive gliosis and complement-mediated synaptic stripping, exacerbate neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. Oligodendrocytes exhibit impaired differentiation and metabolic support, while Schwann cells display abnormalities in myelination, extracellular matrix composition, and neuromuscular junction maintenance, further compromising motor function. Dysregulation of pathways such as NF-κB, Notch, and JAK/STAT, alongside the upregulation of complement proteins and microRNAs, reinforces the non-cell-autonomous nature of SMA. Despite the advances in SMN-restorative therapies, they do not fully mitigate glial dysfunction. Targeting glial pathology, including modulation of reactive astrogliosis, microglial polarization, and myelination deficits, represents a critical avenue for therapeutic intervention. This review comprehensively examines the multifaceted roles of glial cells in SMA and highlights emerging glia-targeted strategies to enhance treatment efficacy and improve patient outcomes.

With multiple disease‐modifying therapies now available, treatment switching has become an important clinical consideration in the management of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). While some switches are prompted by suboptimal clinical response, more commonly they are driven by treatment burden, convenience, or adverse events. This systematic literature review aimed to synthesize existing evidence on therapy switching in SMA, focusing on clinical effectiveness and practical implications to support evidence‐informed decision‐making in a rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024600221). A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Global Health and Embase was conducted between 11 and 14 October 2024. Eligible studies included clinical trials and real‐world evidence (RWE) reports describing patients with genetically confirmed SMA who received nusinersen or risdiplam and subsequently switched to nusinersen, risdiplam or onasemnogene abeparvovec. Four studies met the inclusion criteria—three RWE studies and one clinical trial. The variability in measures of central tendency and variability among studies precluded the calculation of pooled summary values. Nonetheless, switching treatments was generally associated with stable motor function, with some improvements reported in selected outcome measures; ventilatory and nutritional support requirements remained largely unchanged. However, long‐term outcomes and standardized data were limited. Future research should prioritize robust RWE and post‐marketing surveillance to evaluate long‐term safety and effectiveness, incorporate standardized switching protocols, and account for SMA genotype–phenotype variation.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare, autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder and a leading genetic cause of infant mortality. The past decade has witnessed a paradigm shift in SMA management with the advent of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs). This narrative review aims to (i) summarize pivotal randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that led to the approval of DMDs for SMA Types 1 and 2; (ii) synthesize real-world evidence on their safety and effectiveness; and (iii) explore emerging therapeutic frontiers, including gene modifiers, predictive biomarkers, prenatal interventions, and combination strategies. Pivotal RCTs and real-world studies demonstrate that onasemnogene abeparvovec (a single-dose gene therapy), nusinersen (an intrathecal antisense oligonucleotide), and risdiplam (an oral SMN2 splicing modifier) each significantly improve survival and motor function milestones compared to natural history in Type 1 and Type 2 SMA, with the majority of treated patients achieving independent sitting and prolonged ventilator-free survival, while safety profiles are generally manageable and distinct for each therapy. Similar outcomes have been demonstrated for presymptomatic patients with SMA. The introduction of DMDs has transformed the prognosis of SMA, particularly for early-onset forms, with robust evidence supporting their efficacy and safety. Continued real-world monitoring and exploration of adjunctive therapies are essential to optimize outcomes across the SMA setting and address unmet needs in non-responders and older patients.

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a rapidly growing global health concern, projected to affect 1.3 billion people by 2050, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach. This review examines the epidemiological disparities in T2D, focusing on modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors, socioeconomic determinants, and healthcare inequities. While genetic predisposition, age, and ethnicity contribute to T2D risk, socioeconomic status (SES) significantly mediates modifiable factors such as diet, physical activity, and access to healthcare. Lower SES is associated with poorer lifestyle choices, limited access to resources, and increased exposure to risk factors, exacerbating T2D prevalence among vulnerable populations. Geographic variations in T2D prevalence are evident, with racial and ethnic minorities and lower-income individuals being disproportionately affected in regions like the United States and Europe. The economic burden of T2D is substantial, with global healthcare expenditures reaching USD 966 billion in 2021 and projected to rise significantly, albeit with variations across different countries and health systems. Despite advancements in treatment, inequities in healthcare access persist, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, hindering optimal glycemic control and consequently contributing to preventable complications and poor health outcomes. This review highlights the critical need for targeted interventions and policy reforms to address the intersection of demographic, economic, and healthcare-related variables influencing T2D disparities. By bridging gaps in prevention, management, and treatment and accounting for the effect of SES on both modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors, the global disease burden of T2D could be reduced and health equity could be improved.