Background and objectives: Total hysterectomy is one of the most common gynecologic surgical procedures and it is mainly performed for benign pathologies. The introduction of robotic single-site surgery (RSS) as an acceptable alternative to laparoendoscopic surgery combines the advantages of robotics with the aesthetic result of a single incision. This study aims to review the existing literature on a single-site robotic hysterectomy in patients with benign pathologies and verify its safety and feasibility. Materials and Methods: Following the recommendations in the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, FP and AR systematically screened the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. No temporal or geographical limitation was discriminatory. Studies containing data about feasibility and safety were included. Results: From 219, only eight studies met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 212 patients were included with a mean patient age of 45.42 years old (range 28–49.5 years old) and a mean BMI of 25.74 kg/m² (range 22–28.5 kg/m²). The mean presurgical time, including port placement and docking time, was 15.56 (range 3–30) minutes. Mean console time was reported in six studies and is 83.21 min (range 25–180 min). The mean operative time is 136.6 min (range 60–294 min) and the mean blood loss is 43.68 mL (range 15–300 mL). Only two patients in the total analyzed had intraoperative complications and no conversion to LPT occurred. The median hospital stay was 1.71 days (range 0.96–3.5 days). The postoperative complication rate was estimated at 1.4% (vaginal bleeding). Conclusions: Our review supports the safety and feasibility of robotic single-site hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.

Background: The treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is definitive concurrent radio chemotherapy which consists of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy (CCRT), with the possible addition of brachytherapy (BT). However, the benefits of adjuvant surgery after neoadjuvant treatments remain a debated issue and a still open question in the literature. This meta-analysis aims to provide an updated view on the controversial topic, focusing on comparing surgery after any adjuvant treatment and standard treatment. Methods: Following the recommendations in the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, the PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched in April 2023 for early publications. No limitations on the country were applied. Only English articles were considered. The comparative studies containing data about disease-free survival (DFS) and/or overall survival (OS) were included in the meta-analysis. Results: The CCRT + surgery group showed a significantly better DFS than CCRT (RR 0.69 [95% CI 0.58–0.81] p < 0.01) and a better OS (RR 0.70 [95% CI 0.55–0.89] p < 0.01). Nine studies comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus surgery and CCRT were also enrolled. The NACT + surgery group showed a significantly better DFS than CCRT (RR 0.66 [95% CI 0.45–0.97] p < 0.01) and a better OS (RR 0.56 [95% CI 0.38–0.83] p < 0.01). In the sub-analysis of three randomized control trials, the surgery group documented a non-significantly better DFS and OS than CCRT (OR 1.10 [95% CI 0.67–1.80] p = 0.72; I² = 69% p = 0.72; OR 1.09 [95% CI 0.63–1.91] p = 0.75; I² = 13% p = 0.32). Conclusion: The results provide updated findings about the efficacy of neoadjuvant treatments, indicating significantly improved DFS and OS in patients undergoing hysterectomy after CCRT or NACT compared with patients undergoing standard treatments.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic potential of systemic inflammatory indices such as Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI) and Systemic Inflammatory Response (SIR). These were assessed in combination with CA 125 to distinguish ovarian carcinoma (OC) from borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) in patients with suspicious adnexal masses. Materials and Methods: A retrospective multicenter observational study including patients undergoing surgery for suspected ovarian neoplasms was conducted. Inclusion criteria required preoperative blood sampling for inflammatory markers and CA 125. SIR-125 and SIRI-125 were developed by combining SIR and SIRI with CA 125 levels. Diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC curve analysis and linear regression models. Results: A total of 63 patients (42 BOT, 21 OC) were analyzed. OC patients exhibited significantly higher SIR-125 and SIRI-125 values (p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy, with AUCs of 0.83 (SIR-125) and 0.82 (SIRI-125). SIR-125 showed higher specificity (0.83), while SIRI-125 had superior sensitivity (0.86). Conclusions: SIR-125 and SIRI-125 enhance diagnostic differentiation between OC and BOT, providing a simple, cost-effective preoperative tool. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these findings in broader patient populations.

Background and Objectives: Systemic inflammatory indices derived from routine blood tests have been proposed as potential biomarkers reflecting tumor behavior. This study aimed to evaluate their association with parameters of locoregional tumor progression in cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study (CERTIFIKO) included 79 patients with cervical cancer enrolled between July 2023 and December 2025. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05673252). Pre-treatment blood samples were used to calculate the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammatory response (SIR), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI). Tumor progression parameters included stromal infiltration, parametrial involvement, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), fornix involvement, lymph node status, histotype, and grading. Associations were assessed using non-parametric tests and linear regression models. Results: Stromal infiltration was significantly associated with PLR (p = 0.011), MLR (p = 0.010), and NLR (p = 0.010). Parametrial involvement was associated with MLR (p = 0.004) and NLR (p = 0.012). Diffuse LVSI was associated with PLR (p = 0.002), NLR (p = 0.006), SIR (p = 0.008), and SIRI (p = 0.034). In multivariable linear regression models, diffuse LVSI remained associated with higher PLR and NLR values, whereas parametrial involvement remained associated with higher MLR, NLR, and SIRI. No significant associations were observed for fornix involvement, histotype, or lymph node status. Conclusions: Systemic inflammatory indices were associated with parameters of locoregional tumor progression in this exploratory cohort of patients with cervical cancer. These findings warrant further evaluation in larger studies before any potential clinical application.

Background: Recent studies highlight the role of microsatellite instability (MSI) in tumor progression. This study examines the link between MSI, type of loss of function, and disease progression in low-grade endometrial carcinoma clinically confined to the uterus, focusing on myometrial infiltration. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control study analyzed data from 144 women treated for clinical stage I low-grade endometrial carcinoma at two university hospitals. Patients were divided into two groups based on microsatellite status: 118 with microsatellite stability (MSS) and 26 with MSI. Immunohistochemical profiling assessed MMR proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6). The primary outcome was the presence of myometrial infiltration, and the secondary outcome was the deepness of infiltration. Data were statistically analyzed using Fisher’s exact, Chi-square, and Wilcoxon tests, with logistic regression applied to evaluate the impact of MSI on these outcomes. Results: Myometrial infiltration was present in 96% of MSS and 98% of MSI cases (p = 0.5). However, deep infiltration (≥50%) was more frequent in patients with MSI (38% vs. 19%, p = 0.042). Stratification by heterodimer loss revealed that loss of MLH1/PMS2 was associated with a higher rate of deep infiltration (47%), while loss of MSH2/MSH6 correlated with lower infiltration risk (14%). In multivariate analysis, MSH2/MSH6 loss remained negatively associated with infiltration (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80–0.98; p = 0.020), independent of grade and LVSI. Conclusions: In low-grade endometrial carcinomas clinically confined to the uterus, MSI does not increase the overall prevalence of myometrial infiltration but is associated with deeper invasion, especially in cases with MLH1/PMS2 loss. MSI profiling could aid in risk stratification and therapeutic planning, particularly in candidates for fertility-sparing treatment.