Stroke is the second leading cause of death and a major cause of disability worldwide. Its incidence is increasing because the population ages. In addition, more young people are affected by stroke in low- and middle-income countries. Ischemic stroke is more frequent but hemorrhagic stroke is responsible for more deaths and disability-adjusted life-years lost. Incidence and mortality of stroke differ between countries, geographical regions, and ethnic groups. In high-income countries mainly, improvements in prevention, acute treatment, and neurorehabilitation have led to a substantial decrease in the burden of stroke over the past 30 years. This article reviews the epidemiological and clinical data concerning stroke incidence and burden around the globe.

Context: The polyuria-polydipsia syndrome comprises primary polydipsia (PP) and central and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (DI). Correctly discriminating these entities is mandatory, given that inadequate treatment causes serious complications. The diagnostic “gold standard” is the water deprivation test with assessment of arginine vasopressin (AVP) activity. However, test interpretation and AVP measurement are challenging. Objective: The objective was to evaluate the accuracy of copeptin, a stable peptide stoichiometrically cosecreted with AVP, in the differential diagnosis of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. Design, Setting, and Patients: This was a prospective multicenter observational cohort study from four Swiss or German tertiary referral centers of adults >18 years old with the history of polyuria and polydipsia. Measurements: A standardized combined water deprivation/3% saline infusion test was performed and terminated when serum sodium exceeded 147 mmol/L. Circulating copeptin and AVP levels were measured regularly throughout the test. Final diagnosis was based on the water deprivation/saline infusion test results, clinical information, and the treatment response. Results: Fifty-five patients were enrolled (11 with complete central DI, 16 with partial central DI, 18 with PP, and 10 with nephrogenic DI). Without prior thirsting, a single baseline copeptin level >21.4 pmol/L differentiated nephrogenic DI from other etiologies with a 100% sensitivity and specificity, rendering a water deprivation testing unnecessary in such cases. A stimulated copeptin >4.9 pmol/L (at sodium levels >147 mmol/L) differentiated between patients with PP and patients with partial central DI with a 94.0% specificity and a 94.4% sensitivity. A stimulated AVP >1.8 pg/mL differentiated between the same categories with a 93.0% specificity and a 83.0% sensitivity. Limitation: This study was limited by incorporation bias from including AVP levels as a diagnostic criterion. Conclusion: Copeptin is a promising new tool in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome, and a valid surrogate marker for AVP. Primary Funding Sources: Swiss National Science Foundation, University of Basel.

Objective: We hypothesized that infectious burden (IB), a composite serologic measure of exposure to common pathogens (i.e., Chlamydia pneumoniae, Helicobacter pylori, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex virus 1 and 2) associated with vascular risk in the prospective Northern Manhattan Study (NOMAS), would also be associated with cognition. Methods: Cognition was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at enrollment and the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) at annual follow-up visits. Adjusted linear and logistic regressions were used to measure the association between IB index and MMSE. Generalized estimating equation models were used to evaluate associations with TICS-m and its change over time. Results: Serologies and cognitive assessments were available in 1,625 participants of the NOMAS cohort. In unadjusted analyses, higher IB index was associated with worse cognition (change per standard deviation [SD] of IB for MMSE was −0.77, p < 0.0001, and for first measurements of TICS-m was −1.89, p < 0.0001). These effects were attenuated after adjusting for risk factors (for MMSE adjusted change per SD of IB = −0.17, p = 0.06, for TICS-m adjusted change per SD IB = −0.68, p < 0.0001). IB was associated with MMSE ≤24 (compared to MMSE >24, adjusted odds ratio 1.26 per SD of IB, 95% confidence interval 1.06–1.51). IB was not associated with cognitive decline over time. The results were similar when IB was limited to viral serologies only. Conclusion: A measure of IB associated with stroke risk and atherosclerosis was independently associated with cognitive performance in this multiethnic cohort. Past infections may contribute to cognitive impairment.

The current European Stroke Organisation expedited recommendation on tenecteplase (TNK) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) advocates that TNK 0.25 mg/kg can be used alternatively to alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator [TPA]) for AIS of <4.5 hours duration, based on a meta-analytical approach establishing noninferiority. Since the publication of these guidelines, 4 additional randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) have provided further insight. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including all available RCTs that investigated efficacy and safety of TNK 0.25 mg/kg compared with TPA for the treatment of AIS within 4.5 hours of onset. The primary outcome was defined as the excellent functional outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-1), whereas good functional outcome (mRS score 0-2), reduced disability at 3 months (≥1-point reduction across all mRS scores), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 3-month mortality were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Pooled estimates were calculated with random-effects model. A prespecified subgroup analysis was performed stratifying for TNK formulation, that is, original TNK vs biocopy: recombinant human TNK tissue-type plasminogen activator that is available in China and has a different production process. Eleven RCTs were included comprising a total of 3,788 patients treated with TNK vs 3,757 patients treated with TPA. TNK was associated with higher likelihood of excellent functional outcome (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.10; p = 0.012; I² = 0%; risk difference 2.95%; 95% CI 0.76%-5.14%; p = 0.008; I² = 0%) and reduced disability at 3 months (common odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.19; p = 0.034; I² = 0%) compared with TPA while good functional outcome (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99-1.07; p = 0.142; I² = 28%) was similar between the groups. Regarding safety outcomes, similar rates of sICH (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.83-1.53; p = 0.456; I² = 0%) and 3-month mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.15; p = 0.727; I² = 12%) were observed. When stratified for TNK regimen (original vs biocopy), statistical significance in achieving an excellent functional outcome at 3 months was retained for the original TNK (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.10; p = 0.044; I² = 0%). The updated meta-analysis confirms similar safety between TNK 0.25 mg/kg and TPA, while showing that TNK is superior to TPA regarding excellent functional outcome and reduced disability at 3 months. These findings support transitioning to TNK in clinical practice.

Stress is defined as anything that throws the body out of homeostatic balance; for example an acute illness. Any stressor which activates the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis leads to an increase in concentrations of the adrenal stress hormone, cortisol. One of the major hypothalamic stress hormones, which is stimulated by different stressors, is vasopressin (AVP). However, measurement of circulating AVP levels is challenging because it is released in a pulsatile pattern, it is unstable and is rapidly cleared from plasma. AVP derives from a larger precursor peptide (pre-provasopressin) along with copeptin which is released in an equimolar ratio to AVP and is more stable in the circulation and easy to determine. Copeptin levels were found to closely mirror the production of AVP. We have shown that copeptin more subtly mirrors the individual stress level compared to cortisol. Due to the positive association of copeptin with the severity of illness and outcome, copeptin has been proposed as a prognostic marker in acute illness. The prognostic accuracy of copeptin has been analysed in sepsis, pneumonia, lower respiratory tract infections, stroke and other acute illnesses. Thereby, copeptin was found to accurately mirror disease severity and to discriminate patients with unfavourable outcomes from patients with favourable outcomes. Copeptin improves the prognostic information provided by commonly used clinical scoring instruments. Importantly, interpretation of copeptin levels must always consider the clinical setting. An accurate prognostic assessment has the potential to guide interventions and effectively plan and monitor rehabilitation and, thus optimise the management of individual patients and the allocation of limited health care resources. Future intervention studies must prove the value of copeptin in clinical decision making and in improving the overall medical management of patients with acute illnesses.