Introduction Snakebite envenoming (SBE) results in over 500 000 deaths or disabling injuries annually. Varespladib methyl, an oral inhibitor of secretory phospholipase A2, is a nearly ubiquitous component of snake venoms. We conducted a phase II clinical trial to assess efficacy and safety of oral varespladib methyl in patients bitten by venomous snakes. Methods This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial enrolled patients in emergency departments in India and the USA. Patients with SBE were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive varespladib methyl or placebo two times per day for 1 week. All patients received standard of care, including antivenom. The primary outcome was change in the composite Snakebite Severity Score (SSS) measuring the severity of envenoming, from baseline to the average composite SSS at 6 and 9 hours. Results Among 95 patients randomised August 2021 through November 2022, the most common snakebites were from Russell’s vipers (n=29), copperheads (n=18) and rattlesnakes (n=14). The SSS improved from baseline to the average at 6 and 9 hours by 1.1 (95% CI, 0.7 to 1.6) in the varespladib group versus 1.5 (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.0) in the placebo group (difference −0.4, 95% CI, −0.8 to 0.1, p=0.13). While key secondary outcomes were not statistically different by treatment group, benefit was seen in the prespecified subgroup initiating study drug within 5 hours of bite (n=37). For this early treatment group, clinically important differences were observed for illness severity over the first week, patient-reported function on days 3 and 7 and complete recovery. No death or treatment emergent serious adverse event occurred. Conclusion For emergency department treatment of snakebites, the addition of varespladib to antivenom did not find evidence of difference for the primary outcome based on the SSS. A potentially promising signal of benefit was observed in patients initiating treatment within 5 hours of snakebite.

A field biologist was bitten by a female Nikolsky’s viper (Vipera berus nikolskii) in Kharkiv Oblast, Ukraine. Two months later, the patient began to experience cold-induced vasospasm of the affected digit diagnosed as acquired Raynaud phenomenon. The patient had more than 30 occurrences during the single winter following the bite, but the signs and symptoms of Raynaud phenomenon disappeared with the end of winter. This report describes the case and puts it into context with the literature on the topic of toxin-induced peripheral vasospastic disorders and their potential importance in snakebite envenoming.

Snakebite envenoming causes an estimated 138,000 deaths annually worldwide, with approximately 75% of fatalities occurring prior to arrival at definitive medical care. Even in regions where antivenom is available in hospitals, the absence of treatment options before a victim can reach definitive care results in delays of many hours before therapy is initiated. Manufacturing complexity, region-specific products, and the risk of anaphylaxis further limit the availability and use of antivenom in many regions. Reducing the persistently high mortality of snakebite envenoming requires both novel scientific approaches and partnerships that extend beyond traditional disciplinary and funding silos. This article describes the collaboration between Ophirex, a Public Benefit Corporation developing the oral secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) inhibitor varespladib, and the United States military, which has identified a capability gap in snakebite treatment for forward-deployed personnel. The partnership was driven by a shared requirement for a shelf-stable, easy-to-administer, snake-species-agnostic therapy suitable for use prior to definitive medical care. A central insight of the program was that military operational requirements and global public health needs converged around the same product characteristics, enabling a strategically aligned development effort. From early proof-of-concept studies through regulatory pathway definition and advanced development, the Military–Ophirex partnership integrated operational requirements, regulatory planning, and iterative risk mitigation to advance manufacturing, nonclinical, and clinical development. This work provides both practical insights into complex drug development and a case study in how structured partnerships can carry innovation through translation in underfunded and operationally challenging conditions.