Jennifer L. McQuade

Dr. Jennifer L. McQuade


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 December 2021 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSChristine N. Spencer
Christine N. Spencer
JMJennifer L. McQuade
Jennifer L. McQuade
VGVancheswaran Gopalakrishnan
Vancheswaran Gopalakrishnan
JMJohn A. McCulloch
John A. McCulloch
MVMarie Vetizou
Marie Vetizou
JWJennifer A. Wargo
Jennifer A. Wargo
Another benefit of dietary fiber: The gut microbiome can modulate the immune system and influence the therapeutic response of cancer patients, yet the mechanisms underlying the effects of microbiota are presently unclear. Spencer et al . add to our understanding of how dietary habits affect microbiota and clinical outcomes to immunotherapy. In an observational study, the researchers found that melanoma patients reporting high fiber (prebiotic) consumption had a better response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy compared with those patients reporting a low-fiber diet. The most marked benefit was observed for those patients reporting a combination of high fiber consumption and no use of over-the-counter probiotic supplements. These findings provide early insights as to how diet-related factors may influence the immune response. —PNK

1 March 2018 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJennifer L. McQuade
Jennifer L. McQuade
CDCarrie R Daniel
Carrie R Daniel
KHKenneth R Hess
Kenneth R Hess
CMCarmen Mak
Carmen Mak
DWDaniel Y Wang
Daniel Y Wang
MDMichael A Davies
Michael A Davies

8 July 2021 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMiles C. Andrews
Miles C. Andrews
CDConnie P. M. Duong
Connie P. M. Duong
VGVancheswaran Gopalakrishnan
Vancheswaran Gopalakrishnan
Valerio IebbaValerio Iebba
Valerio Iebba
WCWei-Shen Chen
Wei-Shen Chen
JWJennifer A. Wargo
Jennifer A. Wargo

26 October 2022 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RARodabe N. Amaria
Rodabe N. Amaria
MPMichael Postow
Michael Postow
EBElizabeth M. Burton
Elizabeth M. Burton
MTMichael T. Tetzlaff
Michael T. Tetzlaff
MRMerrick I. Ross
Merrick I. Ross
HTHussein A. Tawbi
Hussein A. Tawbi
Relatlimab and nivolumab combination immunotherapy improves progression-free survival over nivolumab monotherapy in patients with unresectable advanced melanoma1. We investigated this regimen in patients with resectable clinical stage III or oligometastatic stage IV melanoma (NCT02519322). Patients received two neoadjuvant doses (nivolumab 480 mg and relatlimab 160 mg intravenously every 4 weeks) followed by surgery, and then ten doses of adjuvant combination therapy. The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate2. The combination resulted in 57% pCR rate and 70% overall pathologic response rate among 30 patients treated. The radiographic response rate using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 was 57%. No grade 3–4 immune-related adverse events were observed in the neoadjuvant setting. The 1- and 2-year recurrence-free survival rate was 100% and 92% for patients with any pathologic response, compared to 88% and 55% for patients who did not have a pathologic response (P = 0.005). Increased immune cell infiltration at baseline, and decrease in M2 macrophages during treatment, were associated with pathologic response. Our results indicate that neoadjuvant relatlimab and nivolumab induces a high pCR rate. Safety during neoadjuvant therapy is favourable compared to other combination immunotherapy regimens. These data, in combination with the results of the RELATIVITY-047 trial1, provide further confirmation of the efficacy and safety of this new immunotherapy regimen.

1 May 2019 in Cancer Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGrant M. Fischer
Grant M. Fischer
AJAli Jalali
Ali Jalali
DKDavid A. Kircher
David A. Kircher
WLWon-Chul Lee
Won-Chul Lee
JMJennifer L. McQuade
Jennifer L. McQuade
MDMichael A Davies
Michael A Davies
There is a critical need to improve our understanding of the pathogenesis of melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Thus, we performed RNA sequencing on 88 resected MBMs and 42 patient-matched extracranial metastases; tumors with sufficient tissue also underwent whole-exome sequencing, T-cell receptor sequencing, and IHC. MBMs demonstrated heterogeneity of immune infiltrates that correlated with prior radiation and post-craniotomy survival. Comparison with patient-matched extracranial metastases identified significant immunosuppression and enrichment of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in MBMs. Gene-expression analysis of intracranial and subcutaneous xenografts, and a spontaneous MBM model, confirmed increased OXPHOS gene expression in MBMs, which was also detected by direct metabolite profiling and [U-13C]-glucose tracing in vivo. IACS-010759, an OXPHOS inhibitor currently in early-phase clinical trials, improved survival of mice bearing MAPK inhibitor–resistant intracranial melanoma xenografts and inhibited MBM formation in the spontaneous MBM model. The results provide new insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutic resistance of MBMs. Significance: Improving our understanding of the pathogenesis of MBMs will facilitate the rational development and prioritization of new therapeutic strategies. This study reports the most comprehensive molecular profiling of patient-matched MBMs and extracranial metastases to date. The data provide new insights into MBM biology and therapeutic resistance. See related commentary by Egelston and Margolin, p. 581. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 565

20 October 2023 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRahul Seth
Rahul Seth
SASanjiv S. Agarwala
Sanjiv S. Agarwala
HMHans Messersmith
Hans Messersmith
KAKrishna C. Alluri
Krishna C. Alluri
PAPaolo A. Ascierto
Paolo A. Ascierto
JWJeffrey Weber
Jeffrey Weber
PURPOSE: To provide guidance to clinicians regarding the use of systemic therapy for melanoma. METHODS: American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted an updated systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: The updated review identified 21 additional randomized trials. UPDATED RECOMMENDATIONS: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab was newly recommended for patients with resectable stage IIIB to IV cutaneous melanoma. For patients with resected cutaneous melanoma, adjuvant nivolumab or pembrolizumab was newly recommended for stage IIB-C disease and adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab was added as a potential option for stage IV disease. For patients with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma, nivolumab plus relatlimab was added as a potential option regardless of BRAF mutation status and nivolumab plus ipilimumab followed by nivolumab was preferred over BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. Talimogene laherparepvec is no longer recommended as an option for patients with BRAF wild-type disease who have progressed on anti–PD-1 therapy. Ipilimumab- and ipilimumab-containing regimens are no longer recommended for patients with BRAF-mutated disease after progression on other therapies. This full update incorporates the new recommendations for uveal melanoma published in the 2022 Rapid Recommendation Update. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/melanoma-guidelines .