Exosomes are extracellular vesicles with diameters ranging from 30 to 150 nm, which contain several donor cell‐associated proteins as well as mRNA, miRNA, and lipids and coordinate multiple physiological and pathological functions through horizontal communication between cells. Almost all types of liver cells, such as hepatocytes and Kupffer cells, are exosome‐releasing and/or exosome‐targeted cells. Exosomes secreted by liver cells play an important role in regulating general physiological functions and also participate in the onset and development of liver diseases, including liver cancer, liver injury, liver fibrosis and viral hepatitis. Liver cell‐derived exosomes carry liver cell‐specific proteins and miRNAs, which can be used as diagnostic biomarkers and treatment targets of liver disease. This review discusses the functions of exosomes derived from different liver cells and provides novel insights based on the latest developments regarding the roles of exosomes in the diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases.

Background: Though ASPP2 plays an important role in regulating cell apoptosis and autophagy in case of liver injury, there remains a lack of clarity on the molecular mechanism of ASPP2 regulating autophagy and apoptosis.Methods: A hepatocyte injury model was constructed using HL7702 cell line and TNF-α. The cells were treated by ASPP2 overexpression adenovirus or short hairpin RNA lentivirus and endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) or the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor or agonist, respectively. The autophagy was detected by means of western blot and Green fluorescent protein-labeled- Microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (GFP-LC3) plasmid transfection, while the apoptosis was detected through western blot, flow cytometry and TUNEL assay. Besides, the proteins related to ERS and mTOR were detected by western blot.Results: The low level of ASPP2 expression was accompanied by high-level autophagy and low-level apoptosis and vice versa in case of hepatocyte injury induce by TNF-α. By upregulating the proteins related to mTORC1 and ERS, ASPP2 induced apoptosis but inhibited autophagy. However, the effect of ASPP2 on autophagy and apoptosis can be reversed by the use of mTORC1 and ERS interfering agent, which indicates that ASPP2 regulated autophagy and apoptosis through mTORC1and ERS pathway. ERS treatment made no difference to the expression of ASPP2 and mTOR-related proteins, which suggests the possibility that the regulation of ERS on apoptosis and autophagy could occur in the downstream of ASPP2 and mTOR.Conclusion: ASPP2 could inhibit autophagy and induce apoptosis through mTORC1-ERS pathway in case of the hepatocyte injury induce by TNF-α. The role of ASPP2-mTORC1-ERS axis was verified in hepatocyte injury, which suggests the possibility that ASPP2 is an important regulatory molecule for the survival and death of hepatocyte.

The initial stage of alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is hepatic steatosis. Recent studies have highlighted a possible role for Apoptosis-stimulating protein 2 of p53 (ASPP2) in regulating hepatic lipid metabolism in nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFLD). However, whether ASPP2 regulates alcohol-induced lipid accumulation and its mechanisms remain unclear. To explore that, we establish an alcoholic liver injury model in vivo and in vitro. The clinical specimens were collected from liver tissues of patients with alcoholic liver disease. Lipid metabolism was detected by HE staining, oil red O staining and qPCR; and ASPP2-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) signaling pathways were detected by western blot and immunohistochemical staining. We found that both ASPP2 and PPARγ expression increased in patients and mouse models with ALD. We also discovered the reduction of ASPP2 significantly inhibited the expression of PPARγ and alleviated alcohol-induced hepatic lipid accumulation and liver injury in vivo and in vitro. Mechanistically, the PPARγ agonist reversed the protective effect of ASPP2 downregulation on hepatic steatosis and liver injury, while the opposite results were observed using PPARγ inhibitor. In conclusion, ASPP2 exacerbates ethanol-induced lipid accumulation and hepatic injury by upregulating the PPARγ signaling pathway, thus promoting the occurrence and development of ALD. Graphical Abstract

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), resulting from Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection, is one of the most severe infectious diseases worldwide. The current state of prevention and control remains critical. Recent studies have increasingly highlighted the significant role of cellular metabolism in regulating immune responses and managing infections. However, whether distinct immunometabolic profiles exist among different groups infected with HIV remains to be investigated. In this study, we employed RNA-seq technology to explore the differential characterization of immune metabolism across various HIV infections. To investigate the metabolic differences in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from HIV-infected populations, we obtained PBMCs from 18 individuals diagnosed with HIV. This cohort included four Immune Responders (IRs), five Immune Non-Responders (INRs), five typical progressors (TPs) who maintained high viral loads, and four Elite Controllers (ECs) who sustained low levels of viral replication without treatment. We conducted single-cell sequencing on the PBMCs derived from these patients and compared the results between IRs and INRs, as well as ECs and TPs. Our findings revealed significant metabolic dysregulation and altered inflammatory states in INRs compared to IRs. These alterations were primarily observed in purine metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and glycolysis pathways, as well as modifications in amino acid and fatty acid metabolism pathways. Furthermore, we identified variations within a subset of CD8⁺ T-cell populations characterized by high expression of GNLY, which predominantly exerts cytotoxic effects. Differences in metabolic pathways were also noted between ECs and TPs; however, these changes mainly focused on OXPHOS and pentose phosphate pathways while no significant differences were observed in glycolysis pathway.