Individuals without a protective antibody level are susceptible to measles infection. There are differences in the persistence of antibodies after vaccination and infection, while the impact of gender on this process has not been sufficiently studied. Measles Ig G antibodies were measured in 1742 employees of a large hospital facility—403 men and 1339 women aged from 25 to 67 years; 15% participants had antibody levels less than the protective threshold of ≥0.18 IU/mL. Significant differences were found in the age group 40–49, where the level of IgG antibodies to measles among men was higher than among women (1.51 IU/mL (0.41; 3.38) vs. 0.70 IU/mL (0.22;1.98) respectively, (U = 3.2, p = 0,001)); in the age group 60 and older, by contrast, the level of antibodies among women was higher compared to men (3.29 IU/mL (1.72; 4.07) vs. 2.90 IU/mL (1.46; 3.53) respectively (U = 2.2, p = 0.03)). The proportion of seronegative women in the age group 40–49 was significantly higher than of seronegative men: 22 [18–26]% and 11 [6–18]% respectively (χ² = 7.0, p = 0.001). The revealed gender characteristics that affect persistence of measles immunity may be important in personalization of vaccinal prevention for men and women.

Within a framework of the state measles elimination program, in April, 2018 a level of measles herd immunity was assessed in 1899 Moscow hospital medical workers aged from 19 to 69 years and older. All subjects enrolled in the study were vaccinated against measles or recovered after measles infection. Serum samples were collected from subjects and examined by ELISA for measles IgG antibodies with the Vector-Best IgG-measle test system (Russia). It was found that 278 (14.6%) and 1621 (85.4%) subjects were seronegative ( 0.18 IU/mL) and seropositive ( 0.18 IU/ml), respectively. Age-related group distribution of 1855 serum samples revealed that percentage of seronegative subjects was in: aged 19—23 years was -38.5%; 24-28 and 29-33 years - 22.2%; 34-38 years - 27.5%; 39-43 years - 25.8%; 44-48 years - 16.8%; 49-53 and 54-58 years — 8.6% and 8.3%, respectively; 59-63 years old — 4.9%; 64-68 and over 69 years old — 0%. Moreover, mean level of measles IgG antibodies increased proportionally to age of medical workers from 0.58 IU/ml (19-23 years) to 2.94-2.72 IU/ml (64-68 and over 69 years). The data obtained indicate that a cohort of measles susceptible subjects (from 38.5% to 16.8%), respectively, is identified among young and middle age (from 19 to 48 years) individuals. It is assumed that two-dose measles vaccination in childhood does not contribute to the long-term preservation of protective levels of measles antibodies, thereby justifying a need to administer a three-dose measles vaccine.

Background: Measles, mumps, and rubella outbreaks continue to occur despite high vaccination coverage, raising concerns about long-term vaccine-induced immunity. This study assessed serological protection against measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella in fully vaccinated Russian adolescents to identify immunity gaps and inform revaccination strategies. Methods: Serum IgG was quantified by commercial ELISA. Analytical cut-offs were: measles ≥ 0.18 IU/mL, rubella ≥ 30 IU/mL, mumps index ≥ 1.0 (index = OD/0.467), and varicella ≥ 1.0 IU/mL; equivocal results were classified as negative in the primary analysis and as positive in a sensitivity analysis. Geometric mean concentrations (GMC) were computed on the natural-logarithm scale. Results: Seropositivity differed markedly between infections (χ² 55.1; p < 0.001): rubella 81.4% (95% CI 74.6–86.7), varicella 57.7% (95% CI 49.8–65.2), mumps 53.2% (95% CI 45.4–60.9) and measles 41.0% (95% CI 33.6–48.9). GMC was lowest for measles (0.132; 95% CI 0.111–0.158) and highest for rubella (61.9; 95% CI 55.3–69.2). The measles estimate was sensitive to the treatment of equivocal results, rising to 53.2% (95% CI 45.4–60.9) at the manufacturer’s cut-off of ≥0.12 IU/mL; rubella rose to 94.9% at ≥16 IU/mL. Conclusions: Lower seropositivity rates for measles and mumps were identified among fully vaccinated adolescents, which fall below standard epidemiological benchmarks. In contrast, rubella seropositivity was robust at 81.4%. Because the measles estimate depended strongly on the assay cut-off applied, and because enzyme immunoassays are known to underestimate seroprevalence relative to neutralization testing, these findings describe the distribution of circulating antibody rather than the prevalence of susceptibility and warrant confirmation in larger representative samples with neutralization testing.