Mohamed E. Labib

Dr. Mohamed E. Labib

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2013 in Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDStanislav S. Dukhin
Stanislav S. Dukhin
MLMohamed E. Labib
Mohamed E. Labib

1 August 2014 in Journal of Membrane Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDStanislav S. Dukhin
Stanislav S. Dukhin
YTYacoob Tabani
Yacoob Tabani
RLRichard Lai
Richard Lai
OLOmar A. Labib
Omar A. Labib
AZAndrew L. Zydney
Andrew L. Zydney
MLMohamed E. Labib
Mohamed E. Labib

1 September 2012 in Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDStanislav S. Dukhin
Stanislav S. Dukhin
MLMohamed E. Labib
Mohamed E. Labib

30 January 2013 in Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RWRoyce A. Wilkinson
Royce A. Wilkinson
SPSeth Pincus
Seth Pincus
KSKejing Song
Kejing Song
JSJoyce B. Shepard
Joyce B. Shepard
AWAlan J. Weaver
Alan J. Weaver
MTMartin Teintze
Martin Teintze

1 August 2011 in Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMohamed E. Labib
Mohamed E. Labib
SDStanislav Dukhin
Stanislav Dukhin
JMJoseph Murawski
Joseph Murawski
YTYacoob Tabani
Yacoob Tabani
RLRichard Lai
Richard Lai

5 May 2024 in Journal of Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMohamed E. Labib
Mohamed E. Labib
APAntonio Perazzo
Antonio Perazzo
JMJames L. Manganaro
James L. Manganaro
YTYacoob Tabani
Yacoob Tabani
CDCarmine J. Durham
Carmine J. Durham
Laurence James WalshLaurence James Walsh
Laurence James Walsh
This laboratory study assessed the performance of a novel fluoride dentifrice containing micro-fibrillated cellulose (MFC) and entrapped silica. Removal of extrinsic stains was assessed using the pellicle cleaning ratio (PCR) method, and radioactive dentin abrasivity (RDA) was measured, to calculate a cleaning efficiency index (CEI). Fluoride efficacy was evaluated using widely used remineralization and fluoride uptake methods. The test product (Protegera™) was compared to common dentifrices (Crest - Cavity Protection™ and ProHealth™, Sensodyne Pronamel™, Arm & Hammer™ Advanced Whitening, Crest ProHealth™, and Colgate Optic White™). The PCR for the MFC dentifrice (141) was comparable to three known marketed stain-removing dentifrices (Arm & Hammer™ Advanced Whitening, Crest ProHealth™, and Colgate Optic White™) but it had a significantly lower RDA (88 ± 6) than 5 other products. This gave it the highest CEI of the tested products (2.0). In a 10-day pH cycling study, the fluoride efficacy of the MFC product was comparable to Sensodyne Pronamel and Crest Cavity Protection. The MFC dentifrice was superior for promoting fluoride uptake into incipient enamel lesions compared to the USP reference dentifrice. The MFC dentifrice has low abrasion, but despite this, it is highly effective in removing stained pellicle. It also is an efficacious fluoride source when compared to relevant commercially available fluoride dentifrices with high dentin abrasivity. The addition of micro-fibrillated cellulose to a fluoride dentifrice gives a low abrasive product that can effectively remove external stains, and serve as an effective fluoride source. This combination of benefits seems well suited to enamel protection and caries prevention.